Proving or Improving: On Health Care Research as a Form of Self-Reflection

Abstract

As it is, clinical trials are the gold standard of health care research, employed to prove that the care practices they study are good. Here, the author suggests that we would do better to develop research methods that work toward another goal: to improve care practices. This requires that we no longer foreground the effectiveness but, instead, investigate the various effects of interventions. If undesirable, they might then be tinkered with. As a part of this, the effects on bodily parameters and on the intricacies of daily lives should not be separated out but studied in connection. With examples drawn from studies into care practices for patients with diabetes or atherosclerosis, the author argues that instead of trying to turn the clinic into a laboratory, we should strive to support and strengthen clinical ways of working.

Keywords

quality of care research methods disease/illness diabetes atherosclerosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Harbers, H. , Mol, A. ,& Stollmeijer, A. (2002). Food matters: Arguments for an ethnography of daily care. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(5/6), 207-226.

Lettinga, A. ,& Mol, A. (1999). Clinical specificity and the non-generalities of science: Oninnovation strategies for neurological physical therapy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 10(6), 517-535.

Mol, A. (2002a). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Mol, A. (2002b). Cutting surgeons, walking patients: Some complexities involved in comparing. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities(pp. 218-257). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Mol, A. ,& Law, J. (2004). Embodied action, enacted bodies: The example of hypoglycaemia. Body& Society, 10(2/3), 43-62.

Moreira, T. (2005). Diversity in clinical guidelines: The role of repertoires of evaluation. Social Science & Medicine, 60(9), 1975-1985.

Pols, J. (2003). Enforcing rights of improving care?: The interference of two modes of doing good in mental health care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(3), 320-347.

Struhkamp, R. (2004). Goals in their setting: Anormative analysis of goal setting in physical rehabilitation. Health Care Analysis, 12(2), 131-155.

Timmermans, S. ,& Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.