In this study, the authors explored how a group of young people aged 16 to 26 years (who identified themselves as having engaged in deliberate self-harm) made sense of the self by conducting two online focus groups and four e-mail interviews. They analyzed data using interpretive phenomenological analysis. The concept of validation was the primary means of making sense of the self and concerned the desire to be considered legitimate and of worth. This desire was clearly evident across three realms of conflict: (a) the intrinsic or extrinsic self, which marked the distinction between objective fact and subjective opinion; (b) the accepted or denied self; and (c) the notion of normality. It is possible that having one’s denied self validated online might lead to an exacerbation of an individual’s self-harming behavior. Further work is needed to explore the effects of online discussion forums on such taboo forms of behavior.
Babiker, G., & Arnold, L. (1997). The language of injury: Comprehending self-mutilation. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society Books.
2.
Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33-48.
3.
Barstow, D. G. (1995). Self-injury and self-mutilation: Nursing approaches. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 33(2), 19-22.
4.
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Campbell, J. D., & Lavallee, L. F. (1993). Who am I? The role of self-concept confusion in understanding the behavior of people with low self-esteem. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem, the puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 3-20). New York: Plenum.
6.
Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behaviour: A review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 800-816.
7.
Clark, A. (2002). Language of self-harm is somatic and needs to be learnt. British Medical Journal, 324, 788.
8.
Clarke, L., & Whittaker, M. (1998). Self-mutilation: Culture, contexts and nursing responses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7, 129-137.
9.
Deiter, P. J., Nicholls, S. S., & Pearlman, L. A. (2000). Self-injury and self-capacities: Assisting an individual in crisis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1173-1191.
10.
Favazza, A. R. (1987). Bodies under siege: Self-mutilation in culture and psychiatry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Favazza, A. R. (1998). The coming of age of self-mutilation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186, 259-268.
12.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
13.
Gaiser, T. J. (1997). Conducting on-line focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 135-144.
14.
Glucklich, A. (1998). Self and sacrifice: A phenomenological psychology of sacred pain. Harvard Theological Review, 92, 479-506.
15.
Haines, J., Williams, C. L., Brain, K. L., & Wilson, G. V. (1995). The psychophysiology of self-mutilation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 471-489.
16.
Harris, J. (2000). Self-harm: Cutting the bad out of me. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 164-173.
17.
Hawton, K., Kingsbury, S., Steinhardt, K., James, A., & Fagg, J. (1999). Repetition of deliberate self-harm by adolescents: The role of psychological factors. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 369-378.
18.
Hawton, K., Rodham, K., Evans, E., & Weatherall, R. (2002). Deliberate self harm in adolescents: Self report survey in schools in England. British Medical Journal, 325, 1207-1211.
19.
Howe, W. (2004). Walt’s Internet glossary. Retrieved August 26, 2005, from http://www.walthowe.com/glossary/index.html
20.
Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
21.
Josephs, R. A., Bossom, J. K., & Jacobs, C. G. (2003). Self-esteem maintenance processes: Why low self-esteem may be resistant to change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 920-933.
22.
Kreitman, N. (Ed.). (1977). Parasuicide. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
23.
Low, G., Jones, D.MacLeod, A., Power, M., & Duggan, C. (2000). Childhood trauma, dissociation and self-harming behavior: A pilot study. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73, 269-278.
24.
McKenna K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet. Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.
25.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 161-176.
26.
Pattison, E. M., & Kahan, J. (1983). The deliberate self-harm syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 867-872.
27.
Rosenberg, M. (1962). The association between self-esteem and anxiety, Psychiatric Research, 1, 135-152.
28.
Safer, D. J. (1997). Self-reported suicide attempts by adolescents. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 9, 263-269.
29.
Saunders, S. M., Resnick, M. D., Hoberman, H. M., & Blum, R. W. (1994). Formal help-seeking behaviour of adolescents identifying themselves as having mental health problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 718-728.
30.
Sharkey, V. (2003). Self-wounding: A literature review. Mental Health Practice, 6, 35-37.
31.
Shochet, I. M., & O’Gorman, J. G. (1995). Ethical issues in research on adolescent depression and suicidal behaviour. Australian Psychologist, 30, 183-186.
32.
Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretive phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261-271.
33.
Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide for research methods. London: Sage.
34.
Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretive phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 218-240). London: Sage
35.
Soloman, Y., & Farrand, J. (1996). Why don’t you do it properly? Young women who self-injure. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 111-119.
36.
Sullivan, C. F. (2003). Gendered cybersupport: A thematic analysis of two online cancer support groups. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 83-103.
37.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
Whitty, M., & Gavin, J. (2001). Age/sex/location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour, 4(5), 623-630.
39.
Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
