In this article, the authors explore the narrative production of stroke from the perspectives of survivors, that is, the stroke itself, not its implications for the individual poststroke. In the vast amount of literature on both sudden onset and chronic illness, the narrative construction of the onset of the illness, for the most part, has been ignored by social scientists, most notably in qualitative research. This is certainly true of stroke. Drawing on existing literature in both chronic illness and the body, the authors extend this to explore the phenomenological construction of stroke onset. Using data gathered from in-depth interviews with 111 stroke survivors postdischarge, they suggest three narrative mechanisms are used in the construct of the sudden-onset event itself: the use of typifications to construct the body during stroke, stroke as an internal communicative act, and stroke as a physical sensation and the mechanisms used to minimize bodily concerns.
Becker, G. (1993). Continuity after a stroke: Implications of life course disruption in old age. The Gerontologist, 31, 631-639.
2.
Becker, G. (1998). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Becker, G., & S. Kaufman. (1995). Managing an uncertain illness trajectory in old age: Patients’ and physicians’ views of stroke. Medical Anthropology, 9, 175-187.
4.
Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 4, 167-182.
5.
Clark, A. M. (2001). Treatment decision-making during the early stages of heart attack: A case for the role of the body and self in influencing delays. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23, 425-446.
6.
Conrad, P. (1985). The meaning of medication: Another look at compliance. Social Science & Medicine, 20, 28-37.
7.
Dempsey, S. J., Dracup, K., & Moser, D. K. (1995). Women’s decision to seek care for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Heart and Lung, 24, 444-456.
8.
Doolittle, N. (1992). A clinical ethnography of stroke recovery. In P. W. Benner (Eds.), Interpretive phenomenology (pp. 211-223). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Ellis-Hill, C., Payne, S., & Ward, C. (2000). Self-body split: Issues of identity in physical recovery following a stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 725-733.
10.
Faircloth, C. (1998). Epilepsies, identities, and difference: Horizons of meaning for individuals with epilepsy. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 602-617.
11.
Faircloth, C. (1999). Revisiting thematization in the narrative study of epilepsy. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 209-227.
12.
Faircloth, C., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., & Young, M. E. (2004). Disrupted bodies: Experiencing the newly limited body in stroke. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 71-87.
13.
Faircloth, C., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., Young, M. E., & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26, 242-261.
14.
Faircloth, C., Rittman, M., Boylstein, C., & van Puymbroeck, M. (2004). Energizing the ordinary: Biographical work and the future in stroke recovery narratives. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(4), 399-414.
15.
Gubrium, J. F. (1986). The social preservation of mind: The Alzheimer’s disease experience. Symbolic Interaction, 6, 37-51.
16.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Gubrium, J. F., Rittman, M., Williams, C., Young, M. E., & Boylstein, C. (2003). Benchmarking as everyday functional assessment in stroke recovery. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 4, S203-S211.
18.
Hill, C. S. (1997). Biographical disruption, narrative and identity in stroke: Personal experience in acquired chronic illness. Auto-Biography, 5, 131-144.
19.
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Hýden, L. C. (1997). Illness and narrative. Sociology of Health and Illness, 19, 48-69.
21.
Kaufman, S. R. (1988). Illness, biography, and the interpretation of self following a stroke. Journal of Aging Studies, 2, 217-227.
22.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Levy, S. (1981). The experience of undergoing a heart attack: The construction of a new reality. Phenomenological Psychology, 12, 137-141.
24.
Mansfield, C., Mitchell, J., & King, D. E. (2002). The doctor as God’s mechanic: Beliefs in the Southeastern United States. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 399-409.
25.
Mattingly, C., & Garro, C. (Eds.). (2002). Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Nijhof, G. (1998). Heterogeneity in interpretation of epilepsy. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 95-105.
27.
Pound, P., Gomperk, P., & Ebrahim, S. (1998). Illness in the context of older age: The case of stroke. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 489-506.
28.
Rosenfeld, D., & Faircloth, C. (2004). A body at rest remains at rest: Movement and morality in arthritis narratives. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 71-87.
29.
Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31-74). New York: Free Press.
30.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31.
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of references to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language studies (pp. 15-21). New York: Irvington.
32.
Sanders, C., Donavan, J., & Dieppe, P. (2002). The significance and consequences of having painful and disabled joints in older age: Co-existing accounts of normal and disrupted biographies. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24, 227-253.
33.
Scambler, G., & Hopkins, A. (1986). Being epileptic: Coming to terms with stigma. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8, 26-43.
34.
Scambler, G., & Hopkins, A. (1990). Generating a model of epileptic stigma: The role of qualitative analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 30, 1187-1194.
35.
Schneider, J., & Conrad, P. (1983). Having epilepsy: The experience and control of illness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36.
Waskul, D. D. (2002). The naked self: Being a body in televideo cybersex. Symbolic Interaction, 25, 487-513.
37.
Webb, D. (1998). A “revenge” on modern times: Notes on traumatic brain injury. Sociology, 32, 541-555.
38.
Wiles, R. (1998). Patients’ perceptions of their heart attack and recovery: The influence of epidemiological “evidence” and personal experience. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 1477-1486.
39.
Williams, G. (2001). Theorizing disability. In G. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 31-64). London: Sage.
40.
Williams, S. (1996). The vicissitudes of embodiment across the chronic illness trajectory. Body and Society, 2, 23-47.
41.
Williams, S. (2000). Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22, 40-67.
