Conflicts in problem solving are known from diabetes research on patients with good glycemic control but have rarely been studied in the care of patients with poor glycemic control. Equally, the different perspectives of health care providers and patients have not been a focus in previous studies. The authors studied the interactions between health care providers and 11 diabetes patients with poor glycemic control in a grounded theory study at a Danish university hospital. Keeping Life and Disease Apart was identified as a core category. It involved a pattern of conflicts both between and within patients and health professionals, which disempowered them in problem solving. Three approaches to problem solving were identified: A compliance-expecting approach kept the pattern unchanged, a failure-expecting approach deadlocked the pattern, and a mutuality-expecting approach appeared to neutralize the conflict.
Anderson, R. M., Funnell, M. M., Butler, P. M., Arnold, M. S., Fitzgerald, J. T., & Feste, C. C. (1995). Patient empowerment: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 18(7), 943-949.
2.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Bos, A. H. (2001). Urteilsbildung in Gruppen: Polarität und Rhytmus als Schüssel zur Entwicklung sozialer Organismen [The model of dynamic judgment building]. Basel, Switzerland: Institut für Sozialforschung, Praxisberatung und Oranizationsentwicklung.
4.
Brown, S. A. (1992). Meta-analysis of diabetes patient education research: Variations in intervention effects across studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 15(6), 409-419.
5.
Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health and Illness, 5(2), 168-195.
6.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
7.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. (1993). The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(14), 977-986.
8.
Fogarty, J. (1997). Reactance theory and patient noncompliance. Social Science & Medicine, 45(8), 1277-1288.
9.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. San Francisco: University of California Press.
10.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
11.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
12.
Glasgow, R. E., & Anderson, R. M. (1999). Moving from compliance to adherence is not enough. Diabetes Care, 22(12), 2090-2092.
13.
Harwell, T. S., Dettori, N., McDowall, J. M., Quesenberry, K., Priest, L., Butcher, M. K., et al. (2002). Do persons with diabetes know their (A1C) number?Diabetes Educator, 28(1), 99-105.
14.
Henson, R. H. (1997). Analysis of the concept of mutuality. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 29(1), 77-81.
15.
Hernandez, C. A. (1995). The experience of living with insulin-dependent diabetes: Lessons for the diabetes educator. Diabetes Educator, 21(1), 33-37.
16.
King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing. New York: John Wiley.
17.
Kyngäs, H., & Hentinen, M. (1995). Meaning attached to compliance with self-care, and conditions for compliance among young diabetics. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 729-736.
18.
Logstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
19.
Lomborg, K., & Kirkevold, M. (2003). Truth and validity in grounded theory—A reconsidered realist interpretation of the criteria: Fit, work, relevance and modifiability. Nursing Philosophy, 4(3), 189-200.
20.
McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1999). Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialogue. London: Sage.
21.
Monsen, N. K. (1998). Det elskende menneske [The loving human being]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
22.
Moote, G. T., Jr., & Wodarski, J. S. (1997). The acquisition of life skills through adventure-based activities and programs: A review of the literature. Adolescence, 32(125), 143-167.
23.
Morse, J. M. (1991). Negotiating commitment and involvement in the nurse-patient relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(4), 455-468.
24.
Nutbeam, D. (1986). Health promotion glossary. Health Promotion, 1(1), 113-127.
25.
Orlando, I. J. (1972). The discipline and teaching of nursing process. New York: Putnam.
26.
Paterson, B. (2001a). Myth of empowerment in chronic illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(5), 574-581.
27.
Paterson, B. L. (2001b). The shifting perspectives model of chronic illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 21-26.
28.
Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S., & Dewis, M. (1998). Adapting to and managing diabetes. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30(1), 57-62.
29.
Polonsky, W. H., Anderson, B. J., Lohrer, P. A., Welch, G., Jacobson, A. M., Aponte, J. E., et al. (1995). Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care, 18(6), 754-760.
30.
Roter, D. (1987). An exploration of health education’s responsibility for a partnership model of client-provider relations. Patient Education and Counseling, 9(1), 25-31.
31.
Roter, D. L., Stashefsky-Margalit, R., & Rudd, R. (2001). Current perspectives on patient education in the US. Patient Education and Counseling, 44(1), 79-86.
32.
Rubin, R. R., & Peyrot, M. (1999). Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism and Research Review, 15(3), 205-218.
33.
Sando, S. H., Hagen, C., & Beck-Nielsen, H. (1994). A method to measure quality of diabetes treatment: Results from an outpatient clinic. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 6(1), 47-54.
34.
Skou, C. V. (2001). Qualitative media analyzer. Aarhus, Denmark: CVS.
35.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 158-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Stubblefield, C., & Mutha, S. (2002). Provider-patient roles in chronic disease management. Journal of Allied Health, 31(2), 87-92.
37.
Sullivan, E. D., & Dayle, H. J. (1998). Struggling with behavior changes: A special case for clients with diabetes. Diabetes Educator, 24(1), 72-77.
38.
Thorsteinsson, B., Kirkegaard, B. C., & Andersen, O. O. (1995). Kvalitetssikring i et diabetesambulatorium [Quality assurance in an outpatient clinic for diabetics]. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 157(31), 4335-4339.
39.
Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care, 21(10), 1644-1652.
40.
World Medical Association. (1989). The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http://www.fda.gov/oc/health/helsinki89.html
41.
Yong, A., Power, E.,& Gill, G. (2002). Improving glycaemic control of insulin-treated diabetic patients—A structured audit of specialist nurse intervention. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11(6), 773-776.
42.
Zoffmann, V. (2004). Guided self-determination: A life skills approach developed in difficult type 1 diabetes. Aarhus, Denmark: Department of Nursing Science, University of Aarhus.
