With advances in genetic medicine, paternity is increasingly being determined by genetic rather than social markers. In this article, the author examines the complex nature of paternity and the way in which it has been constructed socially, legally, and medically. She then presents the results from an empirical study on public attitudes toward genetic testing and paternity. In particular, she examines lay attitudes toward an ethical dilemma posed by the incidental discovery of nonpaternity during the process of genetic testing for a recessively inherited disease. She concludes the article by drawing attention to the potential problems inherent in the intervention of genetic medicine into family relationships.
Anderlik, M. R., & Rothstein, M. A. (2002). DNA-based identity testing and the future of the family: A research agenda. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 28(2/3), 215-232.
2.
Australian Centre for Emerging Technologies and Society (ACETS). (2003). Swinburne national technology and society monitor. Hawthorn, Australia: Swinburne University of Technology. Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http://www.swin.edu.au/sbs/acets/monitor/2003MonitorFULL.pdf
3.
Brodwin, P. (2002). Genetics, identity, and the anthropology of essentialism. Anthropological Quarterly, 75(2), 323-330.
4.
Evensen, C., Hoban, T., & Woodrum, E. (2000). Technology and morality: Influences on public attitudes towards biotechnology. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 13(1), 43-57.
5.
Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 421-422.
6.
Henn, W. (2000). Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: A challenge for ethical guidelines. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(6), 444-446.
7.
Hirczy, W. (1993). Anew twist in divorce: Paternity tests as Solomon’s sword. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 20(1/2), 85-104.
8.
Hirczy, W. (1995). Protecting the father-child bond against non-paternity action: Legislative, judicial, and constitutional approaches. E-Law: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 2(3). Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v2n3/hirczy23.html
9.
Lucassen, A., & Parker, M. (2001). Revealing false paternity: Some ethical considerations. The Lancet, 357(9261), 1033-1035.
10.
Macintyre, S., & Sooman, A. (1991). Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening. The Lancet, 338(8771), 869-871.
11.
Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and custom in savage society. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
12.
Millward Brown Australia. (2001). Biotechnology public awareness survey: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Biotechnology Australia. Retrieved December 13, 2004, from http://www.biotechnology.gov.au/library/content_library/BA_MBsurveyresults.pdf
13.
Pencarinha, D., Bell, N., Edwards, J., & Best, R. (1992). Ethical issues in genetic counselling: A comparison of MS counselor and medical geneticist perspectives. Journal of Genetic Counselling, 1, 19-30.
14.
Pilnick, A. (2002). Genetics and society: An introduction. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
15.
Turney, L., Gilding, M., Critchley, C., Shields, P., Bakacs, L., & Butler, K. A. (2003). DNA paternity testing: Public perceptions and the influence of gender. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 1(1). Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http://www.swin.edu.au/sbs/ajets/journal/issue1/issue1home.htm
16.
Wertz, D. (1999). Ethics and genetics in international perspective: Results of a survey. In I. Nippert, H. Neitzel, & G. Wolff (Eds.), The new genetics: From research to health care (pp. 75-94). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
17.
Wertz, D., Fletcher, J., & Mulvihill, J. (1990). Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: Cross-cultural comparisons among 18 nations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 46, 1200-1213.
18.
World Health Organization. (1998). Proposed international guidelines on ethical issues in medical genetics and genetic services. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
19.
Wright, L., MacRae, S., Gordon, D., Elliot, E., Dixon, D., Abbey, S., et al. (2002). Disclosure of misattributed paternity: Issues involved in the discovery of unsought information. Seminars in Dialysis, 15(3), 202-206.
