In an era of pressure toward evidence-based health care, we are witnessing a new enthusiasm for qualitative metasynthesis as an enterprise distinct from conventional literature reviews, secondary analyses, and the many other scholarly endeavors with which it is sometimes confused. This article represents the reflections of five scholars, each ofwhom has authored a distinct qualitative metasynthesis strategy. By providing the reader a glimpse into the tradition of their various qualitative metasynthesis projects, these authors offer a finely nuanced examination of the tensions between comparison and integration, deconstruction and synthesis, and reporting and integration within the metasynthesis endeavor. In so doing, they account for many of the current confusions about representation and generalization within the products of these inquiries. Through understanding the bases of their unique angles of vision, the reader is invited to engage in their commitment to scholarly integrity and intellectual credibility in this emerging methodological challenge.
Avis, M. (2003). Doweneed methodological theory to do qualitative research?Qualitative Health Research, 13, 995-1004.
2.
Benner, P. (1994). The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology. In P. Benner (Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness(pp. 99-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
4.
Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M.,& Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesize qualitative research: Aworked example. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7, 209-215.
5.
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M.,& Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating metaethnography: Asynthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 671-684.
6.
Charmaz, C. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin& Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed., pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Chopra, D. (2000). Perfect health: The complete mind body guide. New York: Three Rivers.
8.
Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia. (20003). Parallax. Family Education Network. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0837583.html
9.
Estabrooks, C., Field, P., & Morse, J. (1994). Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 503-511.
10.
Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art—So far. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 893-904.
11.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Glaser, B. (1968). Organizational careers: A sourcebook for theory. Chicago: Aldine.
13.
Glaser, B. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory?FQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). Retrieved July 19, 2004, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-02/3-02glaser-e.htm
14.
Glaser, B.,& Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
15.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1971). Status passage: A formal theory. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
Glass, G. V. (2000). Meta-analysis at 25. Retrieved August 18, 2003, from http://glass.ed.asu.edu/gene/papers/meta25.html
17.
Gouldner, A. (1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Hess Rice, E. (2002). The collaboration process in professional development schools: Results of a metaethnography, 1990-1998. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(11), 55-68.
19.
Jensen, L.,& Allen, M. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553-560.
20.
Joachim, G., & Acorn, S. (2000). Living with chronic illness: The interface of stigma and normalization. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 32(3), 37-48.
21.
Kearney, M. H. (1998a). Ready to wear: Discovering grounded formal theory. Research in Nursing & Health, 21, 179-186.
22.
Kearney, M. H. (1998b). Truthful self-nurturing: Agrounded formal theory of women’s addiction recovery. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 495-512.
23.
Kearney, M. H. (1999). Understanding women’s recovery fromillness and trauma. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Kearney, M. H. (2001a). Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women’s experience of domestic violence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 270-282.
25.
Kearney, M. H. (2001b). Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 145-153.
26.
Kearney, M. H. (2001c). New directions in grounded formal theory. In R. Schreiber & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing(pp. 227-246). New York: Springer.
27.
Kearney, M. H., & O’Sullivan, J. (2003). Identity shifts as turning points in health behavior change. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 134-152.
28.
MacDonald, M., & Schreiber, R. S. (2001). Constructing and deconstructing: Grounded theory in a postmodern world. In R. S. Schreiber & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing(pp. 55-84). New York: Springer.
29.
Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
30.
McCormick, J., Rodney, P., & Varcoe, C. (2003). Reinterpretations across studies: An approach to metaanalysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 933-944.
31.
Morse, J., & Johnson, J. (Eds.). (1991). The illness experience: Dimensions of suffering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Noblit, G. W. (1984) The prospects of applied ethnography for education: A sociology of knowledge interpretation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(1), 95-101.
33.
Noblit, G.,& Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Paterson, B. (2001). The shifting perspectives model of chronic illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33, 21-26.
35.
Paterson, B., Thorne, S., Canam, C.,& Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Pridham, K. (1993). Anticipatory guidance of parents of new infants: Potential contribution of the internal working model construct. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 49-56.
37.
Ritzer, G. (1991). Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
38.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). On the aesthetics of qualitative research. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27, 205-209.
39.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003a). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 905-923.
40.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003b). Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research, 52, 226-233.
41.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003c). Motherhood in the context of maternal HIV infection. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 470-482.
42.
Sandelowski, M.,& Barroso, J. (2003d). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 153-170.
43.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003e). Writing the proposal for a qualitative research methodology project. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 781-820.
44.
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365-371.
45.
Schreiber, R. S., & Stern, P. N. (Eds.). (2001). Using grounded theory in nursing. New York: Springer.
46.
Schreiber, R., Crooks, D.,& Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue(pp. 311-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1966). Policy, poetry and success. Economic Journal, 76(3), 755-767.
48.
Sherwood, G. (1999). Meta-synthesis: Merging qualitative studies to develop nursing knowledge. International Journal for Human Caring, 3(1), 37-42.
49.
Slemon, S. (1998). Climbing Mount Everest: Postcolonialism in the culture of ascent. Canadian Literature, 158, 15-35.
50.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(1st ed., pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
Thorne, S. E. (2001). The implications of disciplinary agenda on quality criteria for qualitative research. In J. M. Morse, J. Swanson,& A. Kuzel (Eds.), The nature of qualitative evidence(pp. 141-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Thorne, S., Joachim, G., Paterson, B.,& Canam, C. (2002). Influence of the research frame on qualitatively derived health science knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), Article 1. Retrieved July 11, 2004, from http://www.ualberta.ca/ijqm/english/engframeset.html
54.
Thorne, S. E., & Paterson, B. L. (2000). Two decades of insider research: What we know and don’t know about chronic illness experience. In J. J. Fitzpatrick & J. Goeppinger (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research(Vol. 18, pp. 3-25). New York: Springer.
55.
Thorne, S., Paterson, B., Acorn, S., Canam, C., Joachim, G., & Jillings, C. (2002). Chronic illness experience: Insights from a qualitative meta-study. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 437-452.
56.
Turner, S. (1980). Sociological explanation as translation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Wuest, J. (1995). Feminist grounded theory: An exploration of the congruency and tensions between the two traditions in knowledge discovery. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 125-137.
58.
Zhao, S. (1991). Metatheory, metamethod, meta-data-analysis: What, why and how?Sociological Perspectives, 34, 377-390.
