Qualitative researchers have an array of choices in how to write up their research. Yet many write in distanced, third-person voices and give short shrift to the voices of informants, as if neither they nor their informants were part of the research. In doing so, they might believe that their writing style is scientific. Unfortunately, such styles of writing not only silence their informants and themselves, but many times they also contradict the philosophies of science on which many forms of qualitative research are based. If our philosophies of science are science, then how we write up our research, when it is consistent with our science, must logically be scientific. “Grab,” or writing that is both interesting and memorable, goes hand in hand with good science.
American Psychological Association. (Ed.). (2001). Publications manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network. New York: Free Press.
3.
Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago school of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Conrad, D. (2003). Exploring risky youth experiences: Popular theatre as a participatory, performative research method. Unpublished manuscript, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
6.
Dollard, J. (1937). Caste and class in a southern town. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Foley, D. E. (2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15 (5), 469-490.
9.
Frazier, E. F. (1932). The Negro family in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Frazier, E. F. (1939). The Negro family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Gilgun, J. F. (1999a). Fingernails painted red: A feminist, semiotic analysis of “hot” text. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 181-207.
12.
Gilgun, J. F. (1999b). Methodological pluralism and qualitative family research. In S. K. Steinmetz, M. B. Sussman, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 219-261). New York: Plenum.
13.
Gilgun, J. F. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: Governmental funding and qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 1 (3), 359-375.
14.
Gilgun, J. F. (in press). Fictionalizing life stories: Yukee the wine thief. Qualitative Inquiry.
15.
Gilgun, J. F., & McLeod, L. (1999). Gendering violence. Studies in Symbolic Interactionism, 22, 167-193.
16.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
18.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledge. Feminist Studies, 14, 575-599.
19.
hooks, b. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston: South End.
20.
Johnson, C. S. (1922). The Negro in Chicago: A study of race relations and a race riot. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. NewYork: Westview.
22.
Mowrer, E. R. (1932). Family, its organization and disorganization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Mullen, C. A., & Finley, S. (2003). (Eds.). Arts-based approaches to qualitative inquiry [Special issue]. Qualitative Inquiry, 9 (2).
24.
Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (Eds.). (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
26.
Small, A. W. (1916). Fifty years of sociology in the United States, 1865-1915. American Journal of Sociology, 21, 712-864.
27.
Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1927). The Polish peasant in Europe and America (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1918-1920)
28.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Young, P. V. (1932). The pilgrims of Russian Town. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
