Of 50 women seeking an abortion in Rochester, New York, between November 1999 and January 2001, 35 went on to complete an in-depth interview from 1 to 6 weeks after their followup clinical visit. Ahigher proportion of women who defined their pregnancy as a baby indicated emotional distress during their in-depth interview compared to those who saw their pregnancy as only having the potential to become a baby. The authors conclude that abortion might be made less difficult through public education about the different views of pregnancy and abortion throughout U.S. history. It might be important for abortion counselors to first ask a woman how she defines her pregnancy. A larger study is warranted.
Allanson, S., & Astbury, J. (1995). The abortion decision: Reasons and ambivalence. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynecology, 16, 123-136.
4.
Appropriations Act of September 30, 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-439 § 209, 90 Stat. 1434 (1976).
5.
Beisel, N. (1997). Imperiled innocents: Anthony Comstock and family reproduction inVictorian America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Blanchard, D. A. (1994). The anti-abortion movement and the rise of the religious right: From polite to fiery protest. New York: Twayne.
7.
Bluestone, B., & Harrison, B. (1982) The deindustrialization of America: Plant closings, community abandonment, and the dismantling of basic industry. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Clark, S., Ellerston, C.,& Winikoff, B. (2000). Is medical abortion acceptable to all American women: The impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the acceptability of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 55(3), 177-182.
9.
Cohan, C. L., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Lydon, J. (1993). Pregnancy decision making: Predictors of early stress and adjustment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 223-239.
10.
Conklin, M. P., & O’Connor, B. P. (1995). Beliefs about the fetus as a moderator of post-abortion psychological well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14(1), 76-95.
11.
Côté-Arsenault, D., & Dombeck, T. B. (2001). Maternal assignment of fetal personhood to a previous pregnancy loss: Relationship to anxiety in the current pregnancy. Health Care for Women International, 22, 649-655.
12.
Cotroneo, M., & Krasner, B. R. (1977). A study of abortion and problems in decision-making. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 3(1), 69-76.
13.
Elul, B., Pearlman, E., Sorhaindo, A., Simonds, W.,& Westhoff, C. (2000). In-depth interviews with medical abortion clients: Thoughts on the method and home administration of misoprostol. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 55(3), 169-172.
14.
Faria, G., Barrett, E., & Goodman, L. M. (1985). Women and abortion: Attitudes, social networks, decisionmaking. Social Work in Health Care, 11(1), 85-99.
Fielding, S. L., Edmunds, E., & Schaff, E. A. (2002). Having an abortion using mifepristone and home misoprostol: Aqualitative analysis of women’s experiences. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(1), 34-40.
18.
Friedlander, M. L., Kaul, T. J.,& Stimel, C. A. (1984). Abortion: Predicting the complexity of the decisionmaking process. Women & Health, 9(1), 43-54.
19.
Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
21.
Hoff, J. (1994). Comparative analysis of abortion in Ireland, Poland, and the United States. Women’s Studies Forum, 17(6), 621-646.
22.
Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K. (2002). Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 294-303.
23.
Kero, A., & Lalos, A. (2000). Ambivalence—A logical response to legal abortion: A prospective study among women and men. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 21(2), 81-91.
24.
Lader, L. (1995). A private matter. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
25.
Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Lee, Y.-T., Kleinbach, R., Hu, P.-C., Peng, Z.-Z., & Chen, X.-Y. (1996). Cross-cultural research on euthanasia and abortion. Journal of Social Issues, 52(2), 131-148.
27.
Macionis, J. J. (1997). Population and urbanization. In J. J. Macionis, Sociology(6th ed., pp. 565-566). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Maguire, M. R. (1989). Symbiosis, biology, and personalization. In E. Doerr & J. W. Prescott (Eds.), Abortion rights and fetal personhood (pp. 11-19). Long Beach, CA: Centerline.
29.
Major, B., Cozzarelli, C., Cooper, M. L., Zubek, J., Richards, C., Wilhite, M., et al. (2000). Psychological responses of women after first-trimester abortion. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 777-784.
30.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Mohr, J. C. (1978). Abortion in America: The origins and evolution of national policy, 1800-1900. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
The evil of the age. (1871, August 23). New York Times, p. 1-1.
33.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania et al. v. Casey, U.S.S.C. § 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
Risen, J., & Thomas, J. L. (1998). Wrath of angels: The American abortion war. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Roe et al. v. Wade, U.S.S.C. § 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
37.
Rothman, B. K. (1986). The tentative pregnancy. New York: Viking.
38.
Saad, L. (2000, April 10). Americans walk the middle road on abortion. Princeton, NJ: GallupOrganization.
39.
Schaff, E. A. (1999). Redefining violence against women: The campaign of violence and the delay of RU486. Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, 8(2), 311-324.
40.
Schaff, E. A., Fielding, S. L., Eisinger, S. H., Stadalius, L. S.,& Fuller, L. (2000). Low-dose mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol at 48 hours for abortion up to 63 days. Contraception, 61, 41-46.
41.
Schaff, E. A., Fielding, S. L., Westhoff, C., Ellerston, C., Eisinger, S. H., Stadalius, L. S., et al. (2000). Vaginal misoprostol administered 1, 2, or 3 days after mifepristone for early medical abortion: Arandomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(15), 1948-1953.
42.
Simonds, W., Ellerston, C., Springer, K., & Winikoff, B. (1998). Abortion revised: Participants in the U.S. clinical trials evaluate mifepristone. Social Science & Medicine, 46(10), 1313-1323.
43.
Spitz, I. M., Bardin, C. W., Benton, L., & Robbins, A. (1998). Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 1241-1247.
44.
Stevans, L. K., Register, C. A., & Sessions, D. N. (1992). The abortion decision: A qualitative choice approach. Social Indicators Research, 27, 327-344.
45.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Trent, K.,& Hoskin, A. W. (1999). Structural determinants of the abortion rate: Across-sectional analysis. Social Biology, 46(1/2), 62-81.
47.
Trent, K., & Powell-Griner, E. (1991). Differences in race, marital status, and education among women obtaining abortions. Social Forces, 69(4), 1121-1141.
48.
United States Census. (2000). Employment status by sex: 2000 (QT-P24). Retrieved January 16, 2003, from www.census.gov
49.
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, U.S.S.C. § 492 U.S. 490 (1989).
50.
Williams, D., & Ventimiglia, J. C. (1981). Abortion or birth? Discriminators in problem pregnancy decisions. Sociological Spectrum, 1, 115-133.
