In this article, the authors discuss their understanding of how the consistent use of language, reflective of the research method used, can deem a study scientifically adequate. Using a hermeneutic phenomenological study, as the basis for the discussion, integrity is posed as a suitable term to describe scientific adequacy. In addition, the authors ask readers to reflect on their beliefs about the language used to discuss other qualitative approaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Annells, M. (1996). Hermeneutic phenomenology: Philosophical perspectives and current use in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 707-713.
2.
Avis, M. (1995). Valid arguments? A consideration of the concept of validity in establishing the credibility of research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 1203-1209.
3.
Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs (D. B. Allison, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
4.
Gadamer, H. G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. Linge, Trans. & Ed.) Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Gadamer, H. G. (1997). Truth and method (2nd ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
6.
Garratt, D., & Hodkinson, P. (1998) Can there be criteria for selecting research criteria? A hermeneutical analysis of an inescapable dilemma. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(4), 515-539.
7.
Geanellos, R. (1998). Hermeneutic philosophy, Part I: Implications of its use as methodology in interpretive nursing research. Nursing Inquiry, 5, 154-165.
8.
Girard, F. (1999). Understanding the myocardial infarction experience from onset to three months post-MI: What is the meaning of the experience of persons living through a myocardial infarction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada.
9.
Hoad, T. F. (Ed). (1996). Oxford concise dictionary of English etymology. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in the postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Kipfer, B. A. (1993). Roget’s 21st century thesaurus (Princeton Language Institute, Ed.). New York: Philip Lief Group.
12.
Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigor in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 976-986.
13.
Koch, T. (1996). Implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: Philosophy, rigor, and representation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1), 174-184.
14.
Koch, T. (1998). Story telling: Is it really research? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(6), 1182-1190.
15.
Koch, T., & Harrington, A. (1998). Reconceptualizing rigor: The case for reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(4), 882-890.
16.
Kusch, M. (1987). “Language in the universal medium... ”—Gadamer’s philosophy of language. Oulu, Finland: Oulun Yliopisto [Oulu University Press].
17.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Risser, J. (1997). Hermeneutics and the voice of the other: Re-reading Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. New York: State University of New York Press.
19.
Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.
20.
van Manen, M. (1998). Researching lived experience. Cobourg, Canada: Althouse.
