The authors describe a participatory research project undertaken by a group of people with schizophrenia under the guidance of a university researcher. Participatory research involves members of the research group in meaningful participation in all stages of the research process. In this study, group members chose the topic—experiences with medical professionals—and method of data collection—in-depth interviews that they conducted with each other. They developed and performed a readers’ theater presentation of the results and their recommendations for how they would like to be treated by medical professionals. The results indicate that good communication with medical professionals is essential to people with schizophrenia; it helps them accept the fact that they are ill and learn to live with the illness. The research offered a transformative experience to group members and is contributing to change in the practice of health care for people with severe mental illnesses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balcazar, F., Keys, C. B., Kaplan, D. L., & Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (1999). Participatory research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges . Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 105-112 .
2.
Burns, T., Baldwin, D., Emsley, R., Kerwin, R., Steinberg, J., & Van Os, J. (1999). Treatment challenges in schizophrenia . Primary Care Psychiatry, 5(3), 117-123 .
3.
Campbell, M, Copeland, K., & Tate, B. (1998). Taking the standpoint of people with disabilities in research: Experiences with participation . Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 95-104 .
4.
Canadian Nurses Association. (1996). Preparation for community living: The Bridge to Discharge Project. Ottawa, Canada: Author .
5.
Chappell, A. L. (2000). Emergence of participatory methodology in learning difficulty research: Under-standing the context . British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 38-43 .
6.
Clafferty, R. A., McCabe, E., & Brown, K. W. (2001). Conspiracy of silence? Telling patients with schizo-phrenia their diagnosis . Psychiatric Bulletin, 25(9), 336-339 .
7.
Davidson, L., Stayner, D. A., Lambert, S., Smith, P., & Sledge, W. H. (2001). Phenomenological and participatory research on schizophrenia: Recovering the person in theory and practice. In D. L. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller, (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 163-179). New York: New York University Press .
8.
Day, J. C., Kinderman, P., & Bentall, R. (1998). A comparison of patients’ and prescribers’ beliefs about neuroleptic side effects: Prevalence, distress and causation . Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 97(1), 93-97 .
9.
Eisen, S. V., Dickey, B., & Sederer, L. I. (2000). Aself-report symptom and problem rating scale to increase inpatients’ involvement in treatment . Psychiatric Services, 51(3), 349-353 .
10.
Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (Eds.). (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York: Intermediate Technology/Apex .
11.
Hornung, W. P., Klingberg, S., Feldmann, R., Schonauer, K., & Schulze Monking, H. (1998). Collaboration with drug treatment by schizophrenic patients with and without psychoeducational training: Results of a one-year follow-up . Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 97(3), 213-219 .
12.
Ivezic, S., Ljubimir, V., & Urlic, I. (2001). Therapist-patient relations in treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients . Midicinski Archiv, 1(Suppl. 1), 55, 39-46 .
13.
Krogh, K. (2001). Beyond four walls: The impact of home support on health, work, and citizenship for people with disabilities. Toronto, Canada: School of Disability Studies, Ryerson University . Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://www.Ryerson.ca/~kkrogh/report1
Manitoba Schizophrenia Society Inc. (2000). The truth about schizophrenia: Why you should change your thinking about youth’s greatest disabler. Winnipeg, Canada: Author .
16.
Oehl, M., Hummer, M., & Fleischhacker, W. W. (2000). Compliance with antipsychotic treatment . Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102(6), 83-87 .
17.
Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 101-114 .
18.
Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Hand-book of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
19.
Richardson, M. (1997). Participatory research methods: People with learning difficulties . British Journal of Nursing, 6, 1114-1121 .
20.
Richardson, M. (2000). How we live: Participatory research with six people with learning difficulties . Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1383-1395 .
21.
Stewart, R., & Bhangwanjee, A. (1999). Promoting group empowerment and self-reliance through participatory research: A case study of people with physical disability . Disability & Rehabilitation, 21, 338-345 .
22.
Torrey, E. F. (2001). Surviving schizophrenia: A manual for families, consumers, and providers. New York: HarperCollins .
23.
Zarb, G. (1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps toward changing the relations of disability research production . Disability and Society, 7, 125-138 .
