Despite the fact that 90% of cervical cancers can be prevented by regular Pap screening, many women are not screened regularly, particularly older women. To understand better the barriers to screening, the authors held five focus groups during April 2000 in Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada. Of the 32% of women aged 45 to 70 who had not been screened over a 5-year period (1995-2000), 60 randomly selected women participated in this research. The authors analyzed discussions for themes using an inductive approach, with interpretation guided by the population health model. Women who have avoided a Pap test are falling between the cracks created by a complex interaction between personal experiences and the health system's approach to Pap screening.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowman, J., Sanson Fisher, R., Boyle, C., Pope, S., & Redman, S. (1995). A randomised controlled trial of strategies to prompt attendance for a Pap smear. Journal of Medical Screening, 2(4), 211-218.
2.
Brooks, S. E. (1996). Cervical cancer screening and the older woman: Obstacles and opportunities. Cancer Practitioner, 4(3), 125-129.
3.
Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11, 461-466.
4.
Carney, P., Dietrich, A. J., & Freeman, D. H. (1992). Improving future preventive care through educational efforts at a women's community screening program. Journal of Community Health, 17(3), 167-174.
5.
Cockburn, J., Hirst, S., Hill. D., & Marks, R. (1990). Increasing cervical screening in women of more than 40 years of age: An intervention in general practice. Medical Journal of Australia, 152, 190-194.
6.
Cote-Arsenault, D., & Morrison-Beedy, D. (1999). Practical advice for planning and conducting focus groups. Nursing Research, 48(5), 280-283.
7.
Deschamps, M., Band, P. R., Hislop, T. G., Clarke, H. F., Smith, J. M., & Ng, V. T. Y. (1992). Barriers to cervical cytology screening in native women in British Columbia. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 16, 337-339.
8.
Emerson, R. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Hamilton, N., & Bhatti, T. (1996). Population health promotion: An integrated model of population health and health promotion. Ottawa: Health Promotion Development Division, Health Canada.
10.
Health Canada. (2002). Cervical cancer screening in Canada: 1998 surveillance report (Cat. No. H39-616/1998E). Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
11.
Health Services Utilization and Research Commission. (1997). A comprehensive approach to cervical cancer screening (Summary Report No. 8). Saskatoon, Canada: Author.
12.
Hill, D., Gardner, G., & Rassaby, J. (1985). Factors predisposing women to take precautions against breast and cervix cancer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(1), 59-79.
13.
Janesick, V. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodology, and meaning. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209-219). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Kelsey, J. L., Wittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in observational epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Kidd, P., & Parshall, M. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 293-308.
16.
Kirkman-Liff, B., & Kronenfeld, J. J. (1992). Access to cancer screening services for women. American Journal of Public Health, 82(5), 733-735.
17.
Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research end (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
National Cancer Institute of Canada. (1995). Canadian cancer statistics 1995. Toronto, Canada: Author.
19.
National Cancer Institute of Canada. (1996). Canadian cancer statistics 1996. Toronto, Canada: Author.
20.
National Cancer Institute of Canada. (1997). Canadian cancer statistics 1997. Toronto, Canada: Author.
21.
National Cancer Institute of Canada. (1998). Canadian cancer statistics 1998. Toronto, Canada: Author.
22.
National Cancer Institute of Canada. (1999). Canadian cancer statistics 1999. Toronto, Canada: Author.
23.
National Cancer Institute of Canada. (2000). Canadian cancer statistics 2000. Toronto, Canada: Author.
24.
Norman, S. A., Talbott, E. O., Kuller, L. H., Krampe, B. R., & Stolley, P. D. (1991). Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates of pap testing: A literature review. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 7(2), 19-21.
25.
Packer, M., & Addison, R. (1989). Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology. New York: State University of New York Press.
26.
Pieranunzzi, V. (1997). The lived experience of power and powerlessness in psychiatric nursing: A Heideggerian hermeneutical analysis. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 11(3), 155-162.
27.
Ricoeur, P. (1979). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. In P. Rabinow & W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader (pp. 73-101). Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Saint-Germain, M. A., Bassford T. L., & Montano, G. (1993). Surveys and focus groups in health research with older Hispanic women. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 341-367.
29.
Schottenfeld, D., & Fraumeni, J. F., Jr. (Eds.). (1996). Cancer epidemiology and prevention (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Shepherd, S. K., & Achterberg, C. L. (1992). Qualitative research methodology: Data collection, analysis, interpretation, and verification. In E. R. Monsen (Ed.), Research: Successful approaches. Chicago: American Dietetic Association.
31.
Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analysing qualitative data: Issues raised by focus groups. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 345-352.
32.
Skubi, D. (1988). Pap smear screening and cervical pathology in an American Indian population. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 33(5), 203-207.
33.
Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
34.
Sweet, L. (1991). Review of cervical screening history of PEI women. Chronic Diseases Canada, 12(1), 1-3.
35.
Thurston, W. E., & Scott C. M. (1996). Barriers to screening: A critical review of the literature (1990-1995). Ottawa: Health Canada.
36.
Ussher, J. (1999). Feminist approaches to qualitative health research. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 98-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Van Til, L. D. (1999). An evaluation of PEI Well Woman Clinics as a recruitment strategy for cervical cancer screening. Charlottetown, Canada: Department of Health and Social Services.
38.
Van Til, L. D., & Dryer, D. (1998). Cancer trends in PEI, 1983-1997. Charlottetown, Canada: Department of Health and Social Services.
39.
Van Til, L. D., MacQuarrie, C., Herbert, R., & MacMillan, H. (2000). Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening in PEI. Charlottetown, Canada: Department of Health and Social Services.
40.
White, G. E. (1995). Older women's attitudes to cervical screening and cervical cancer: A New Zealand experience. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(4), 659666.
