The authors undertook a qualitative meta-analysis of their own studies to examine the context of health care and health care relationships. They “translated” selected concepts and metaphors from each study through those of the other studies, yielding new interpretations. In this article, they present their methods, discuss possible applications of this approach, and examine some issues that remain unresolved in the area of qualitative meta-analysis. They offer this approach, which produced broader perspectives than the individual studies afforded, as a promising way of synthesizing qualitative findings, providing a foundation for praxis, and influencing practice toward health and social justice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. M. (1991). Reflexivity in fieldwork: Toward a feminist epistemology. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(2), 115-118.
2.
Burke, S. O., Kauffmann, E., Costello, E., Wiskin, N., & Harrison, B. (1998). Stressors in families with a child with a chronic condition: An analysis of qualitative studies and a framework. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 30(1), 71-95.
3.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Emden, C., & Sandelowski, M. (1999). The good, the bad and the relative, part two: Goodness and the criterion problem in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 5, 2-7.
5.
Estabrooks, C. A., Field, P. A., & Morse, J. M. (1994). Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 503-511.
6.
Gergen, M., & Gergen, K. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1025-1046). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1994). A synthesis of qualitative research on wellness-illness. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 349-369.
8.
Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553-560.
Knafl, K. A., & Breitmayer, B. J. (1991). Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (Rev. ed., pp. 226-239). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Marcus, G. E. (1994). What comes (just) after “post'? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 563-574). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
McCormick, J. (1997). The discourses of control: Power in nursing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
14.
Morse, J. (2001). Qualitative verification: Building evidence by extending basic findings. In J. Morse, J. Swanson, & A. Kuzel (Eds.), The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 203-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Morse, J., & Johnson, J. (Eds.). (1991). The illness experience: Dimensions of suffering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Paterson, B., Thorne, S., & Dewis, M. (1998). Adapting to and managing diabetes. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30(1), 57-62.
19.
Rodney, P. (1997). Towards connectedness and trust: Nurses' enactment of their moral agency within an organizational context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
20.
Rodney, P., & Varcoe, C. (2001). Toward ethical inquiry in the economic evaluation of nursing practice. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 33(1), 35-57.
21.
Sandelowski, M. (1997). “To be of use”: Enhancing the utility of qualitative research. Nursing Outlook, 45(3), 125-132.
22.
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365-371.
23.
Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 311-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Smith, J. K., & Deemer, D. K. (2000). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 877-896). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Thorne, S., & Paterson, B. (1998). Shifting images of chronic illness. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30(2), 173-178.
27.
Varcoe, C. (1997). Untying our hands: The social context of nursing in relation to violence against women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
28.
Varcoe, C., & Rodney, P. (2002). Constrained agency: The social structure of nurses' work. In B. S. Bolaria & H. Dickinson (Eds.), Health, illness, and health care in Canada (3rd ed., pp. 102-128). Toronto, Canada: Nelson.
29.
Varcoe, C., Rodney, P., & McCormick, J. (2003). Health care relationships in context: An analysis of three ethnographies. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6).
30.
Zhao, S. (1991). Metatheory, metamethod, qualitative meta-analysis: What, why, and how? Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 377-390.
