Like other single-parent families, those consisting of mothers and their children who leave abusive partners/fathers are broadly viewed as deficient, high-risk structures in which children are susceptible to multiple problems. The mechanisms of strength and vulnerability in these families are poorly understood, and, consequently, their health promotion processes remain virtually unexplored. In a feminist grounded theory study of health promotion processes of single-parent families after leaving abusive partners/fathers, the authors discovered intrusion to be the basic social problem as families strive to promote health in the aftermath of abuse. The authors discuss the complex nature of intrusion, demonstrating how health is socially determined, and the challenges of health promotion in terms of the issues and dilemmas faced by study families and consider implications for health promotion knowledge and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amato, P. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269-1287.
2.
Barber, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). Long-term influence of divorce and single parenting on adolescent family-and work-related values, behaviors and aspirations. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 108-126.
3.
Berman, H. (1999). Health in the aftermath of violence: A critical narrative study of children of war and children of battered women. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 31(3), 89-109.
4.
Berman, H. (2000). The relevance of narrative research with children who witness war and children who witness woman abuse. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 3(1), 107-125.
5.
Brodie, J. (1996). Canadian women, changing state forms, and public policy. In J. Brodie (Ed.), Women and Canadian public policy (pp. 1-30). Toronto, Canada: Harcourt Brace.
6.
Browne, A., Salomon, A., & Bassuk, S. (1999). The impact of recent partner violence on poor women's capacity to maintain work. Violence Against Women, 5(4), 393-426.
7.
Edelson, J. (1999). Children's witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 839-870.
8.
Ellis, D. (1992). Woman abuse among separated and divorced women: The relevance of social support. In E. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177-189). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
9.
Eriksson, M., & Hester, M. (2001). Violent men as good-enough fathers? Violence Against Women, 7(7), 779-798.
10.
Evans, P. (1998). Gender, poverty, and women's caring. In C. Baines, P. Evans, & S. Neysmith (Eds.), Women's caring: Feminist perspectives on social welfare (pp. 47-69). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
11.
Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. (1994). Strategies for population health: Investing in the health of Canadians [Paper presented at the meeting of the Ministers of Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, September 14-15, 1994]. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
12.
Fleury, R., Sullivan, C., & Bybee, D. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence. Violence Against Women, 6(12), 1363-1383.
13.
Ford-Gilboe, M. (2000). Dispelling myths and creating opportunity: A comparison of the strengths of single-parent and two-parent families. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(1), 41-58.
14.
Ford-Gilboe, M. (2002). Developing knowledge about family health promotion by testing the Developmental Model of Health and Nursing. Journal of Family Nursing, 8(2), 140-156.
15.
Ford-Gilboe, M., & Campbell, J. (1996). The mother-headed single-parent family: A feminist critique of the nursing literature. Nursing Outlook, 44(4), 173-183.
16.
Ganley, A., & Schecter, S. (1996). Domestic violence: A national curriculum for children's protective services. San Francisco: Family Violence Prevention Fund.
17.
Geffner, R., & Pagelow, M. D. (1990). Mediation and child custody issues in abusive relationships. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 151-159.
18.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
19.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
20.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
21.
Government of Canada. (1998). For the sake of the children: Report of the special joint committee on child custody and access. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
22.
Hamilton, N., & Bhatti, T. (1996). Population health promotion: An integrated model of population health and health promotion. Ottawa, Canada: Health Promotion Development Division, Health Canada.
23.
Hartrick, G. (1997). Beyond a service model of care: Health promotion and the enhancement of family capacity. Journal of Family Nursing, 3(1), 57-70.
24.
Jaffe, P. G., Wolfe, D. A., & Wilson, S. K. (1990). Children of battered women. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Kickbusch, I. (1994). Principles and strategies of interventions. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 83-89.
26.
Kurz, D. (1996). Separation, divorce, and woman abuse. Violence Against Women, 2(1), 63-81.
27.
Lalonde, M. (1974). A new perspective on the health of Canadians. Ottawa, Canada: Information Canada.
28.
Lempert, L. (1996). Women's strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 269-289.
29.
Levendosky, A., Lynch, S., & Graham-Bermann, S. (2000). Mothers' perceptions of the impact of woman abuse on their parenting. Violence Against Women, 6(3), 247-271.
30.
McMurray, A. (1997). Violence against ex-wives: Anger and advocacy. Health Care for Women International, 18, 543-556.
31.
Mosher, J. (1998). Caught in tangled webs of care: Women abused in intimate relationships. In C. Baines, P. Evans, & S. Neysmith (Eds.), Women's caring: Feminist perspectives on social welfare (2nd ed., pp. 139-159). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
32.
Newman, K. (1993). Giving up: Shelter experiences of battered women. Public Health Nursing, 10(2), 108-113.
33.
Nordborg, G. (1997). Om juridikens kön [The gender of law]. In G. Nordborg (Ed.), Makt & kön: Tretton bidrag till feministisk kunskap [Gender & power: Thirteen contributions to feminist knowledge] (pp. 171-198). Stockholm, Sweden: Symposion.
34.
Parker, B., & Ulrich, Y. (1990). A protocol of safety: Research on the abuse of women. Nursing Research, 30, 248-250.
35.
Saunders, D. (1994). Child custody decisions in families experiencing woman abuse. Social Work, 39, 51-57.
36.
Sev'er, A. (1997). Recent or imminent separation and violence against women. Violence Against Women, 3, 566-590.
37.
Shalansky, C., Erickson, J., & Henderson, A. (1999). Abused women and child custody: Ongoing exposure to abusive ex-partners. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 416-428.
38.
Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1999). Family fragments. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
39.
Stephens, D. (1999). Battered women's views of their children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(7), 731-746.
40.
Sullivan, C., Juras, J., Bybee, C., Nguyen, H., & Allen, N. (2000). How children's adjustment is affected by their relationships to their mother's abusers. Violence Against Women, 15(6), 587-602.
41.
Swift, K., & Birmingham, M. (2000). Location, location, location: Restructuring and the everyday lives of “welfare moms.” In S. Neysmith (Ed), Restructuring caring labour: Discourse, state practice, and everyday life (pp. 93-116). Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.
42.
Taylor, G., Barnsley, J., & Goldsmith, P. (1996). Women and children last: Custody disputes and the family “justice” system. Vancouver, Canada: Vancouver Custody and Access Support and Advocacy Association.
43.
Wainer, J., & Chesters, J. (2000). Rural mental health: Neither romanticism nor despair. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 8, 141-147.
44.
Williamson, D., & Reutter, L. (1999). Defining and measuring poverty: Implications for the health of Canadians. Health Promotion International, 14(4), 355-364.
45.
World Health Organization. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Ottawa, Canada: Health and Welfare.
46.
World Health Association. (1997). The Jakarta Declaration on leading health promotion into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 12, 261-264.
47.
Wuest, J. (1995). Feminist grounded theory: An exploration of congruency and tensions between two traditions in knowledge discovery. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 125-137.
48.
Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (1999). Not going back: Sustaining the separation in the process of leaving abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 5, 110-133.
49.
Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (2001). Feminist grounded theory revisited. In R. Schreiber & P. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 159-176). New York: Springer.
50.
Zorza, J. (1995). How abused women can use the law to help protect their children. In E. Peled, P. Jaffe, & J. Edelson (Eds.), Cycle of violence (pp. 147-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
