Increasingly, researchers are undertaking studies involving people who do not speak the same language as they do. Sociologists have long argued that language constructs the social world at the same time as it describes it. However, the implications of this for cross-language research are rarely considered. Employing interpreters/translators and “cultural brokers” in research raises methodological issues around the meanings of concepts and how to convey difference. Using a project that employed two Asian mental health workers, the author teases out some of the implications for research of language difference. She focuses both on the value of a biographical approach and on the problems such an approach presents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alibhai-Brown, Y. (2000) Who do we think we are? Imagining the New Britain. London: Penguin.
2.
Andrews, M. (2000). Texts in a changing context: Reconstructing lives in East Germany. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples (pp. 181-195). London: Routledge.
3.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.
4.
Cooper, A. (2000). The vanishing point of resemblance: Comparative welfare as philosophical anthropology. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples (pp. 90-108). London: Routledge.
5.
Edwards, R. (1998). A critical examination of the use of interpreters in the qualitative research process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24, 197-208.
6.
Fernando, S. (1991). Mental health, race, and culture. London: Macmillan in association with MIND Publications.
7.
Fernando, S. (1995). The way forward. In S. Fernando (Ed.), Mental health in a multi-ethnic society: A multidisciplinary handbook (pp. 193-216). London: Routledge.
8.
Hammersley, M. (1995). The politics of social research. London: Sage.
9.
Johnson, M. , Noble, C., Matthews, C., & Aguilar, N. (1999). Bilingual communications within the health care setting. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 329-343.
10.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-188). London: Sage.
11.
Mahony, P. , & Zmroczek, C. (1997). Class matters: Working class women’s perspectives on social class. London: Taylor & Francis.
12.
Phelan, M. , & Parkman, S. (1995). Work with an interpreter. BMJ, 311, 555-557.
13.
Sassoon, M. & Lindow, V. (1995) Consulting and empowering Black mental health system users. In S. Fernando (Ed.), Mental health in a multi-ethnic society: A multi-disciplinary handbook (pp. 89-106). London: Routledge.
14.
Simon, S. (1996). Gender in translation: Cultural identity and the politics of transmission. London: Routledge.
15.
Spivak, G. (1992). The politics of translation. In M. Barrett & A. Phillips (Eds.), Destabilizing theory: Contemporary feminist debates (pp. 177-200). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
16.
Spivak, G. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. London: Routledge.
17.
Stanley, L. (1990). Moments of writing: Is there a feminist auto/biography?Gender and History, 2, 58-67.
18.
Temple, B. (1997). Watch your tongue: Issues in translation and cross-cultural research. Sociology, 31, 607-618.
19.
Temple, B. (1999). Translating the translators, interpreting the interpreters. In M. Banting, J. Elliott, M. Dongchao, D. Oates, & B. Temple (Eds.), Inside the translation machine: Pro/feminist writings on translation issues in women’s studies (pp. 48-55). Manchester, UK: Women’s Studies Centre, University of Manchester.
20.
Thomas, G. (1991). Linguistic purism. London: Longman.
Wengraf, T. (2000). Uncovering the general from within the particular: From contingencies to typologies in the understanding of cases. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples (pp. 140-164). London: Routledge.
