In this article, a research study that examined the working relationships between Deaf and hearing professionals in health and educational services in the United Kingdom is addressed. These service providers worked in bilingual organizations where both British Sign Language and English were used and in which Deaf people’s identity as a cultural-linguistic minority was accepted. The focus of this article is on issues of validity and epistemology that arose for the Deaf and hearing research team in the course of this study. In particular, it examines the influence of identity attributions on the research process for researchers operating within a context of historical oppression, minority language use and legitimization of research knowledge, and challenges to the interpretative analysis used in the study that arose from the dynamics of majority-minority power relations in the wider social world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker-Shenk, C. , & Kyle, J. G. (1990). Research with deaf people: Issues and conflicts. Disability, Handicap and Society, 5(1), 65-75.
2.
Brien, D. (Ed.). (1992). Dictionary of British Sign Language. London: Faber.
3.
Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought. London: Routledge.
4.
Eisenhart, M. A. , & Howe, K. R. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. D. Le Compte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 644-680). London: Academic Press.
5.
Hammersley, M. (1990). Reading ethnographic research: A critical guide. Essex, UK: Addison-Wesley.
6.
Holman, R. (1987). Research from the underside. British Journal of Social Work, 17(6), 669-683.
7.
Jones, L. , Kyle, J. G., & Wood, P. (1987). Words apart: Losing your hearing as an adult. London: Tavistock.
8.
Kyle, J. G. , & Allsop, L. (1982). Deaf people and the community: Final report to Nuffield Foundation. Bristol, UK: Bristol University, School of Education.
9.
Ladd, P. (1988). The modern deaf community. In D. Miles (Ed.), British sign language: A beginner’s guide (pp. 27-43). London: BBC Books.
10.
Lane, H. (1984). When the mind hears. London: Penguin.
11.
Lane, H. (1992). The mask of benevolence. New York: Knopf.
12.
Maynard, M. (1994). Methods, practice and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10-25). London: Taylor & Francis.
13.
Maynard, M. , & Purvis, J. (1994). Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. London: Taylor & Francis.
14.
Millen, D. (1997). Some methodological and epistemological issues raised by doing feminist research on non-feminist women. Sociological Research Online [Online], 2(3). Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/3/3.html
15.
Moore, M. , Beazley, C., & Maelzer, J. (1998). Researching disability issues. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
16.
Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production?Disability Handicap and Society, 7(2), 101-113.
17.
Oliver, M. , & Barnes, C. (1997). All we are saying is give disabled researchers a chance. Disability and Society, 12(5), 811-813.
18.
Padden, C. , & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Ramazanogolu, C. (1990). Methods of working as a research team, wrap paper 3. London: Tufnell.
20.
Ridgeway, S. M. (1998). Psychological health and well being in a random sample population of the Deaf. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
21.
Schofield, J. W. (1993). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues (pp. 91-109). London: Paul Chapman.
22.
Scott, S. (1985). Feminist research and qualitative methods: A discussion of some of the issues. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Issues in educational research (pp. 67-85). London: Falmer.
23.
Shakespeare P. , Atkinson D., & French S. (Eds.). (1993). Reflecting on research practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
24.
Shakespeare, T. (1996). Rules of engagement: doing disability research. Disability and Society, 11(1), 115-119.
25.
Stanley, L. , & Wise, S. (1992). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research process. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis (pp. 20-60). London: Routledge.
26.
Sutton-Spence, R. , & Woll, B. (1999). The linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
The Voice. (1998). 1(1).
28.
Wainwright, D. (1997). Can sociological research be qualitative, critical and valid?The Qualitative Report, [Online] 3(2). Available: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/wain.html
29.
Young, A. , Ackerman, J., & Kyle, J. (1998). Looking on: Deaf people and the organisation of services. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
30.
Young, A. , Ackerman, J., & Kyle, J. (2000). On creating a workable signing environment: Deaf and hearing perspectives. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 186-195.
31.
Zarb, G. (1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps toward changing the relations of disability research production. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 125-138.
