Designing and carrying out effective and valid research are the desired goals of all researchers, and demonstrating the trustworthiness of one’s dissertation research is a requirement for all doctoral candidates. For qualitative researchers, reaching the desired goal and meeting the requirement of trustworthiness become particularly problematic due to the considerable debate about what it means to do valid research in the field of qualitative inquiry. This article reviews the various approaches to the validity problem in the hope of turning this debate into a dialogue. Validity is traced from its origins in the realist ontology and foundational epistemology of quantitative inquiry to its reformulations within the lifeworld ontology and non-foundationalism of interpretive human inquiry. Various recent qualitative approaches to validity are considered, and interpretive reconfigurations of validity are reviewed. Interpretive approaches to validity are synthesized as ethical and substantive procedures of validation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alcoff, L. (1994). The problem of speaking for others. In S. O. Weisser & J. Fleischner (Eds.), Feminist nightmares: Women at odds: Feminism and the problem of sisterhood (pp. 285-309). New York: New York University Press.
2.
Altheide, D. L. , & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Bailey, P. H. (1997). Finding your way around qualitative methods in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 18-22.
4.
Bergum, V. (1991). Being a phenomenological researcher. In J. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research (Rev. ed., pp. 55-71). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
(Reprinted from Women to mother: A transformation, by V. Bergum, 1989, Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey)
6.
Bernstein, R. J. (1985). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (1995). Fidelity as a criterion for practicing and evaluating narrative inquiry. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 25-35). London: Falmer Press.
8.
Capra, F. (1983). The turning point. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9.
Capra, F. (1989). Uncommon wisdom: Conversations with remarkable people. Toronto, Canada: Bantam Books.
10.
Caputo, J. D. (1987). Radical hermeneutics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Construct validity and the discourses of research. American Journal of Education, 96, 421-457.
12.
Colaizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
15.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Denzin, N. K. (1994). Triangulation in educational research. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 6461-6465). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
17.
Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Eisener, E. W. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Researcher, 17, 15-20.
19.
Eisener, E. W. (1990). The meaning of alternate paradigms for practice. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialogue (pp. 88-102). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Fiumara, G. C. (1990). The other side of language. New York: Routledge.
21.
Flax, J. (1990). Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Frank, A. (1992). The pedagogy of suffering. Theory and Psychology, 2, 467-485.
23.
Gadamer, H. G. (1994). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Seabury.
24.
Gillet, G. (1995, March). The philosophical foundations of qualitative psychology. The Psychologist, 8, 111-114.
25.
Giorgio, A. (1992). Description versus interpretation: Competing alternative strategies for qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 23(2), 119-135.
26.
Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Hammersley, M. (1995). Theory and evidence in qualitative research. Quality and Quantity, 29, 55-66.
29.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
30.
Haslanger, S. (1993). On being objective and being objectified. In L. M. Anthony & C. Witt (Eds.), A mind of one’s own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity (pp. 85-126). Boulder, CO: Westview.
31.
Heshusius, L. (1994). Freeing ourselves from objectivity: Managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 15-22.
32.
Howe, K. , & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-9.
33.
Jardine, D. (1990). Awakening from Descartes’ nightmare: On the love of ambiguity in phenomenological approaches to education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10, 211-232.
34.
Jardine, D. (1994). Speaking with a boneless tongue. Bragg Creek, Canada: Makyo Press.
35.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Kleinman, A. (1992). Local worlds of suffering: An interpersonal focus for ethnographies of illness experience. Qualitative Health Research, 2(2), 127-134.
37.
Kolakowski, L. (1993). Philosophy: An overall view of positivism. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics & practice (pp. 1-8). London: Sage Ltd.
38.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structures of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
39.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Lather, P. A. (1986a). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63-84.
41.
Lather, P. A. (1986b). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 257-277.
42.
Lather, P. A. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 87-99.
43.
Lather, P. A. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673-693.
44.
Lather, P. A. (1994). Staying dumb? Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. In H. Simons & M. Billig (Eds.), After postmodernism (pp. 101-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Leininger, M. (1992). Current issues, problems, and trends to advance qualitative paradigmatic research methods for the future. Qualitative Health Research, 2(4), 392-415.
46.
Lenzo, K. (1995). Validity and self-reflexivity meet poststructuralism: Scientific ethos and the transgressive self. Educational Researcher, 24(4), 17-23.
47.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). The making of a constructivist: A remembrance of transformations past. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialogue (pp. 67-87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1988, April). Criteria for assessing naturalistic inquiries as reports. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
49.
Madison, G. (1988). The hermeneutics of postmodernity: Figure and themes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
50.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?Educational Researcher, 17(3), 13-17.
51.
Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279-300.
52.
McCarl-Nielsen, J. (1990). Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
53.
Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415-440.
54.
Morgan, G. (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55.
Morse, J. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability?Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5-12.
57.
Moss, P. A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25, 10-28.
58.
Mugerauer, R. (1989). Language and the emergence of environment. In D. Seamon & R. Mugerauer (Eds.), Dwelling place and environment: Towards a phenomenology of person and world (pp. 51-70). New York: Columbia University Press.
59.
Nielsen, H. B. (1995). Seductive texts with serious intentions. Educational Researcher, 24, 4-12.
60.
Osborne, J. W. (1990). Some basic existential-phenomenological research methodology for counsellors. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 24, 79-91.
Peshkin, A. (1993). The goodness of qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 24-30.
63.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 41-60). New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advanced Nursing Science, 16, 1-8.
65.
Sandelowski, M. (1996). Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 19, 359-364.
66.
Sanjek, R. (1990). Fieldnotes: The makings of an anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
67.
Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
68.
Smith, J. K. (1984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 379-391.
69.
Smith, J. K. (1990). Goodness criteria: Alternative research paradigms and the problem of criteria. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialogue (pp. 167-187). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
Unger, R. K. (1992). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! In J. Bohan (Ed.), Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women’s place in psychology (pp. 147-170). Boulder, CO: Westview.
71.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Ontario, Canada: Althouse.
72.
Von Eckartsberg, R. (1983). Existential-phenomenology, validity and the transpersonal ground of psychological theorizing. In A. Giorgio, A. Barton, & C. Maes (Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 199-206). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
73.
Wakefield, J. C. (1995). When an irresistible epistemology meets an immovable ontology. Social Work Research, 19(1), 9-17.
74.
Woolcot, H. F. (1990). On seeking-and-rejecting validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisener & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
