The rapidly expanding discipline of interpretive inquiry, especially in its narrative analysis form, has not been fully cognizant of certain crucial epistemological and methodological assumptions that form the ultimate basis of its purpose. Even after abandoning traditional positivist views, the related disciplines within the human sciences that are engaged in interpretive inquiry have still not discovered the core implicit assumptions that militate against a full acceptance of this form of inquiry. This article outlines the locus of these implicit assumptions and then argues that the legitimacy of these enterprises must be grounded in a well-known but heretofore undiscovered perspective, namely, Wittgenstein’s notion of a family resemblance. It is argued that this metaphoric phrase is the key to unlocking the real and unique nature of narrative analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
2.
Bambrough, R. (1960). Universals and family resemblances. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 61, 187-204.
3.
Becker, H. S. (1981). Exploring life photographically. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Denzin, N. K. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Duchan, J. F. , Bruder, G. A., & Hewitt, L. E. (Eds.). (1995). Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
8.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of culture (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
9.
Goetz, J. P. , & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, fiction, and forecast (4th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
11.
Guba, E. G. (1990). Carrying on the dialogue. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 368-378). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Haack, S. (1995). Evidence and inquiry: Towards reconstruction in epistemology. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
13.
Hartnack, J. (1962). Wittgenstein and modern philosophy. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
14.
Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.
15.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, five, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1964). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
19.
Maher, P. (1988). Prediction, accommodation, and the logic of discovery. In A. Fine & J. Lepin (Eds.), Philosophy of Science Association 1988 (Vol. 1, pp. 273-285). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
20.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.
21.
Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279-300.
22.
Merryfield, M. M. (1990). Constructing scenes and dialogue to display findings in case study reporting. Columbus: Ohio State University, College of Education.
23.
Miles, M. S. , & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Miller, S. I. , & Fredericks, M. (1989). On the projectibility of anthropological hypotheses. Erkenntnis, 30, 279-299.
25.
Miller, S. I. , & Fredericks, M. (1990). Perceptions of the crisis in American public education: The relationship of metaphors to ideology. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3(2), 67-81.
26.
Miller, S. I. , & Fredericks, M. (1991a). A case for qualitative confirmation for the social and behavioral sciences. Philosophy of Science, 58, 452-467.
27.
Miller, S. I. , & Fredericks, M. (1991b). Postpositivistic assumptions and educational research: Another view. Educational Researcher, 20, 2-8.
28.
Miller, S. I. , & Fredericks, M. (1995). Can there be “rules” for qualitative inquiry?Journal of Thought, 31(2), 61-71.
29.
Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1980). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Phillips, D. C. (1987). Philosophy, science and social inquiry. New York: Pergamon.
31.
Pinker, S. (1984). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper-Perennial.
32.
Pitcher, G. (1968). Wittgenstein: The philosophical investigations. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
33.
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
34.
Robinson, W. S. (1951). The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review, 16, 812-818.
35.
Roth, P. A. (1987). Meaning and method in the social sciences: A case for methodological pluralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
37.
Smith, J. (1983). Quantitative vs. qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13.
38.
Strauss, A. L. , & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922/1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuiness, Trans.). New York: Humanities Press.
41.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1968). Philosophical investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
42.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Blue and brown books. New York: Barnes and Noble.
43.
Ziller, R. C. (1990). Photographing the self: Methods of observing personal orientations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
