Dualistic Notions About Children With Motor Disabilities: Hands to Lean on or to Reach Out?

Abstract

This article is an attempt to break through the dualistic thinking in theories on the treatment of children with a motor impairment. There is the Cartesian thinking that views the body and mind as separate entities; alternatively, some existential phenomenologists have constructed a dichotomy between the (positively valued) unnoticed body and the (negatively valued) noticed body. Dualistic notions of this kind can lead therapists to treat parts of the child (arms, legs, or speech) rather than the whole child. How can the disadvantageous effects of these dichotomies be overcome in the treatment of children? First, a concrete sketch of the development of corporality in (disabled) children will be provided. Next, the dualistic notions will be discussed. Finally, there is a discussion about how children and their care providers might benefit from this phenomenological explication.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beekman, A. J. (1983). Human science as a dialogue with children. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 1, 36-44.

Behnke, E. A. (1984). World without opposite/flesh of the world (A carnal introduction). Felton, CA: California Center for Jean Gebser Studies.

Behnke, E. A. (1988). Matching. Somatics, 6, 24-32.

Behnke, E. A. (1996). Edmund Husserl’s contribution to phenomenology of the body in Ideas II. In T. Nenon & L. Embree (Eds.), Issues in Husserl’s Ideas II (pp. 135-160). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bleeker, H. , & Mulderij, K. J. (1992). The experience of motor disability. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 10, 1-18.

Cogher, L. , Savage, E. , & Smith, M. F. (1992). Cerebral palsy, the child and young person. London: Chapman & Hall Medical.

Hanna, T. (1988). Somatics: Reawakening the mind’s control of movement, flexibility and health. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Ketelaar, M. (1999). Children with cerebral palsy: A functional approach to physical therapy. Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon.

Kunnen, S. (1992). Mastering (with) a handicap: The development of task-attitudes in physically handicapped children. Groningen, the Netherlands: Stichting Kinderstudies.

10.

Lewis, V. (1987). Development and handicap. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

11.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

12.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The child’s relation with others. In J. M. Edie (Ed.), The primacy of perception (pp. 96-155). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

13.

Moss, D. (1989). Brain, body and world. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 63-82). New York: Plenum.

14.

Mulderij, K. J. (1996a). Children’s perspective on the study of the child. In E. Verhellen (Ed.), Understanding children’s rights (pp. 121-135). Ghent, Belgium: Children’s Rights Centre.

15.

Mulderij, K. J. (1996b). Research into the lifeworld of physically disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 22, 311-322.

16.

Mulderij, K. J. (1997). Peer relations and friendship in physically disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 23, 379-389.

17.

Nolan, C. (1987). Under the eye of the clock. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, Pan Books.

18.

Sartre, J. P. (1943). L’être et le néant [Being and nothingness]. Paris: Gallimard.

19.

Schloss, P. J. , Alper, S. , & Jayne, D. (1994). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: Choice, risk and dignity. Exceptional Children, 60, 215-225.

20.

Straus, E. W. (1966). Phenomenological psychology. New York: Basic Books.

21.

Touwen, B.C.L. (1978). Variability and stereotypy in normal and deviant development. In J. Apley (Ed.), Care of the handicapped child (pp. 99-110). London: SIMP with Heineman Medical.

22.

Touwen, B.C.L. (1993). How normal is variable or how variable is normal? Early Human Development: An International Journal Concerned with the Continuity of Fetal and Postnatal Life, 34, 1-12.

23.

van den Berg, J. H. (1950). Menselijk lichaam, menselijke beweging [Human body, human locomotion]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 5, 4-5.

24.

Viorst, J. (1996). Necessary losses. New York: Fawcett Crest.

25.

Vos, I. (1990). Marianne, de barrière doorbroken [Marianne, breaking through the barrier]. Franeker, the Netherlands: van Wijnen.

26.

Wright, B. A. (1959/1983) Physical disability: A psychosocial approach. New York: Harper & Row.