Post-Shelter Services: The Efficacy of Follow-Up Programs for Abused Women

Abstract

Abused women who decide to leave their partners face a number of obstacles, including increased risk of abuse, lack of social support, and difficulty accessing community resources Post-shelter follow-up programs are a new form of intervention designed to provide support and advocacy to women who wish to establish new lives independently from their abusive partner. This article presents evaluations of two such follow-up programs, consisting of both quantitative and qualitative components. Workers provided the demographic characteristics and answered rating scales regarding safety, self-esteem, and use of social supports for 60 women. Standardized measures of social support and perceived stress were completed by a subset of 28 women when they entered the programs and 3 months later. The women significantly improved their amount of appraisal support, although tangible and belonging support and perceived stress levels did not change significantly. Self-esteem improved significantly for another subset of 12 follow-up program clients. In-depth interviews with 31 of the women identified problematic issues with which the clients reported receiving support from the follow-up program. Clients also outlined their views of the strengths and limitations of the programs. The majority of the women perceived the programs as central in their not returning to an abusive relationship.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguirre, B. (1985). Why do they return? Abused wives in shelters Social Work, 30, 350-354.

Bowker, L. , & Maurer, L. (1985). The importance of sheltering in the lives of battered women Response to the Victimization of Women and Children, 8, 2-8.

Cannon, J. , & Sparks, J. (1989). Shelters—An alternative to violence: A psychosocial case study Journal of Community Psychology, 17,203-213.

Cohen, S. (1985). Social support and the buffenng hypothesis Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.

Cohen, S. , Kamarck, T. , & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24, 385-396.

Cohen, S. , Mermelstein, R. , Kamarck, T. , & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measunng the functional components of social support In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and application (pp. 73-94). The Hague, Holland: Maritnus Nijhoff.

Coleman, H. , & Unrau, Y. (1995). Analyzing your data In L. Tutty, M. Rothery, & R. Grinnell, Jr. (Eds.), Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps and tasks (pp. 85-115). Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon.

Coopersmith, S. (1990). Self esteem inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Ellis, D. (1992). Woman abuse among separated and divorced women: The relevance of social support In E. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 177-189). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

10.

Fantuzzo, J. , & Lindquist, C. (1989). The effects of observing conjugal violence on children: A review and analysis of research methodology Journal of Family Violence, 4, 77-94.

11.

Giles-Sims, J. (1983). Wife-battering: A systems theory approach. New York: Guilford.

12.

Gondolf, E. , & Fisher, E. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

13.

Greaves , L. , Heapy, N. , & Wylie, A. (1988). Advocacy services: Reassessing the profile and needs of battered women Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 7, 39-51.

14.

Hughes, H. (1988). Psychological and behavioral correlates of family violence in child witnesses and victims American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 77-90.

15.

Jaffe, P. , Wolfe, D. , & Wilson, S. (1990). Children of battered women. Newbury Park, CA

Sage.

16.

Johnson, I. , Crowley, J. , & Sigler, R. (1992). Agency response to domestic violence: Services provided to battered women In E. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 191-202). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

17.

McDonald, P.L. (1989). Transition houses and the problem of family violence. In B. Pressman, G. Cameron, & M. Rothery (Eds.), Intervening with assaulted women: Current research, theory and practice (pp. 111-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

McDonald, P.L. , Chisholm, W. , Peressini, T. , & Smillie, T. (1986). A review of a second stage shelter for battered women and their children (Project #4558-32-2 Ottawa, Ontano: National Welfare Grants Directorate, Health and Welfare Canada.

19.

Moore, T. , Peplar, D. , Mae, R. , & Kates, M. (1989). Effects of family violence on children: New directions for research and intervention In B. Pressman, G. Cameron, & M. Rothery (Eds.), Intervening with assaulted women: Current research, theory and practice (pp. 93-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Okun, L. (1988). Termination or resumption of cohabitation in woman battering relationships: A statistical study In G. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. Kirkpatrick, & M Straus (Ed.), Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 107-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

21.

Pagelow, M.D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Praeger.

22.

Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

23.

Peled, E. , & Edleson, J. (1994). Advocacy for battered women: A national survey Journal of Family Violence,9, 285-296.

24.

Schutte, N. , Bouleige, L. , & Malouf, J. (1986). Returning to a partner after leaving a crisis shelter: A decision faced by battered women Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 295-298.

25.

Scyner, L. , & McGregor, N. (1988). Women in second stage housing: What happens after the crisis Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 7, 129-135.

26.

Snyder, D. , & Scheer, N. (1981). Predicting disposition following brief residence at a shelter for battered women American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 559-566.

27.

Sullivan, C. (1991a). The provision of advocacy services to women leaving abusive partners: An exploratory study Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 41-54.

28.

Sullivan, C. (1991b). The provision of advocacy services to women leaving abusive partners: An examination of short-term effects American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 953-960.

29.

Sullivan, C. , Basta, J. , Tan, C. , & Davidson, W. (1992). After the crisis: A needs assessment of women leaving a domestic violence shelter Violence and Victims, 7, 267-275.

30.

Sullivan, C. , Tan, C. , Basta, J. , Rumptz, M. , & Davidson, W. (1992). An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners: Initial evaluation American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 309-332.

31.

Tutty, L. (1993). After the shelter: Critical issues for women who leave assaultive relationships Canadian Social Work Review, 10, 183-201.

32.

Tutty, L. , Bidgood, B. , & Rothery, M. (1993). An evaluation of support groups for assaulted women Journal of Family Violence, 8, 325-343.

33.

Tutty, L. , Bidgood, B. , & Rothery, M. (1996). The impact of group process and client variables in support groups for battered women Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 308-324.

34.

Wilson, M. , Baglioni, A. , & Downing, D. (1989). Analyzing factors influencing readmission to a battered women's shelter Journal of Family Violence, 4, 275-284.