This article describes the central elements of a family-based reunification service that was found
to be effective in reducing foster care placements in Utah. In addition, the article assesses the
relation between types of services and program outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AuClaire, P. & Schwartz, I.M. (1986). An evaluation of the effectiveness of intensive home-based services as an alternative to placement for adolescents and their families. Minneapolis, MN: Hennepin County Community Services Department and the University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs.
2.
Callister, J.P., Mitchell, L., & Tolley, G. (1986). Profiling family preservation efforts in Utah , Children Today, 15(6), 23-25, 36-37.
3.
Committee on Ways and Means, U. S. House of Representatives. (1991). Overview of entitlement programs; background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the committee on ways and means: 1991 green book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
4.
Fanshel, D., Finch, S.J., & Grundy, J.F. (1989). Foster Children in Life-Course Perspective: The Casey Family Program Experience, Child Welfare, 69, 391-402.
5.
Feldman, L.H. (1991, December). Assessing the Effectiveness of Family Preservation Services in New Jersey within an Ecological Context (Final Report . New Jersey: Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Quality Assurance, New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services.
6.
Frankel, H. (1988). Family-centered, home-based services in child protection: A review of the research, Social Service Review , 62, 137-157.
7.
Fraser, M. W., Pecora, P. J., & Haapala, D. A. (Eds.) (1991). Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services. New York: Aldine.
8.
Fraser, M.W., Pecora, P.J., & Lewis, R.E. (1991). The correlates of treatment success and failure for intensive family preservation services. In M. W. Fraser, P. J. Pecora, & D. A. Haapala (Eds.), Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services (pp. 181-224). New York: Aldine.
9.
Goerge, R.M. (1990). The reunification process in substitute care, Social Service Review, 64, 422-457.
10.
Goerge, R.M. (1988). Cumulative effects of a child's placement in substitute care. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1988.
11.
Grigsby, R.K. (1990). Reuniting children with their families after foster care: An exploratory study of the family restoration process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
12.
Haapala, D.A. & Kinney, J.M. (1979). Homebuilder's approach to the training of in-home therapists. In S. Maybanks & M. Bryce (Eds.), Home-based services for children and families (pp. 248-259). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
13.
Jones, M.A. (1985). A second chance for families: Five years later, follow-up of a program to prevent foster care. New York : Child Welfare League of America.
14.
Jones, M.A., Neuman, R., & Shyne, A.W. (1976). A second chance for families: Evaluation of a program to reduce foster care. New York: Child Welfare League of America.
15.
Kadushin, A. (1980). Child welfare services. New York: Macmillan.
16.
Kinney, J.M., Haapala, D.A., & Booth, C. (1991). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model . Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
17.
Lahti, J. (1982). A follow-up study of foster children in permanent placements, Social Service Review, 56, 556-571.
18.
Lantz, B.K. (1985). Keeping troubled teens at home, Children Today, 14(3), 9-12.
19.
Lewis, R.E. (1990). Service-related correlates of treatment success in intensive home-based child welfare services. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT .
20.
Lewis, R.E. (1991a). What are the characteristics of intensive family preservation services? In M. W. Fraser, P. J. Pecora, & D. A. Haapala (Eds.), Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services (pp. 93-108). New York: Aldine.
21.
Lewis, R.E. (1991b). What elements of service relate to treatment goal achievement? In M. W. Fraser, P. J. Pecora, & D. A. Haapala (Eds.), Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services (pp. 225-272). New York: Aldine.
22.
Lewis, R.E. (1994). Application and adaptation of intensive family preservation services to use for the reunification of foster children with their biological parents, Children and Youth Services Review , 16, 339-361.
23.
Maluccio, A.N., Krieger, R., & Pine, B.A. (1988). Promoting family reunification through agency-school collaboration: Project summary. West Hartford, CT: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Development Services, Administration for Children, Youth and Families.
24.
Nelson, J.P. (1985). An experimental evaluation of a home-based family-centered program model in a public child protection agency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
25.
Nelson, K.E., Emlen, A., Landsman, M.J., & Hutchinson, J. (1988). Family based services: Factors contributing to success and failure in family based child welfare services: Final report. Iowa City, IO: National Resource Center on Family Based Services, School of Social Work, University of Iowa.
26.
Nelson, K.E. & Landsman, M.J. (1992). Alternative models offamily preservation. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
27.
Pray, J.E. (1991). Respecting the uniqueness of the individual: Social work practice within a reflective model, Social Work, 36(1), 80-85.
28.
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
29.
Rzepnicki, T.L. (1987). Recidivism of foster children returned to their own homes: A review and new directions for research. Social Service Review, 61, 56-70.
30.
Schuerman, J., Rzepnicki, T.L., Littell, J.H., & Chak, A. (1993). Evaluation of the Illinois Family First Placement Prevention Program: Final report. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children.
31.
Stein, T.J., Gambrill, E.D., & Wiltse, K.T. (1978). Children in foster homes: Achieving continuity of care. New York: Praeger.
32.
Szykula, S.A. & Fleischman, M.J. (1985). Reducing out-of-home placements of abused children: Two controlled field studies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 277-283.
33.
Tatara, T. (1992). Child substitute care population trends—FY82 through FY91: A summary. VCFS Research Notes, No. 6. Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association .
34.
University Associates. (1993, March). Evaluation of Michigan's Families First program. Lansing, MI: Author.
35.
Wald, M.S., Carlsmith, J.M., & Leiderman, P.H. (1988). Protecting abused and neglected children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
Walton, E. (1991). The reunification of children with their families: a test of intensive services following out-of-home placement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Wells, K. & Biegel, D.E. (1991). Conclusion. In K. Wells & D. E. Biegel (Eds.), Family preservation services: Research and evaluation, (pp. 241-250). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Whittaker, J.K. (1991). The leadership challenge in family-based services: Policy, practice, and research. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 72, 294-300.
40.
Willems, D.M. & DeRubeis, R. (1981). The effectiveness of intensive preventive services for families with abused, neglected, or disturbed children. Trenton, NJ: Bureau of Research, New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services.
41.
Wulczyn, F. (1991). Caseload dynamics and foster care reentry, Social Service Review, 65, 133-156.
42.
Yuan, Y.T., McDonald, W.R., Wheeler, C.E., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Rivest, M. (1990). Evaluation of A81562 in-home care demonstration projects, Volume 1: Final report. Sacramento, CA: Walter R. McDonald & Associates.
