Recent years have seen a number of articles questioning both the utility and practicality of
single-case designs. The authors propose a flexible monitoring method for practice evaluation.
The proposed method is presented as a dynamic model, one that utilizes the existing evaluative
procedures of the practitioner. This flexible method is proposed within the general outlines of
developmental research. It is proposed as a method designed to lead practitioners toward an
empirical model of practice. Some case examples are provided to substantiate the utility and
value of the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. ( 1984). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon.
2.
Benbenishty, R., & Ben-Zaken, A. (1988). Computer-aided process of monitoring task-centered family interventions. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 24, 7-9.
3.
Bloom, M., & Fischer, J. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
4.
Blythe, B. J., & Briar, S. (1985). Developing empirically based models of practice. Social Work, 30, 483-488.
5.
Briar, S. (1977). Incorporating research into education for clinical practice in social work: Toward a clinical science in social work. In A. Rubin & A. Rosenblatt (Eds.), Sourcebook on research utilization (pp. 132-140). New York: Council on Social Work Education.
6.
Broden, B., Hall, R. V., & Mitts, B. (1971). The effect of self-recording the classroom behavior of two eighth-grade students . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 191-199.
7.
Brunner, I., & Guzman, A. (1989). Participatory evaluation: A tool to assess projects and empower people. International Innovations in Evaluation Methodology: New Directions for Program Evaluation, 42, 9-18.
8.
Campbell, J. A. (1988). Client acceptance of single-system evaluation procedures. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 24, 21-22.
9.
Conte, J. R., & Levy, R. L. (1980). Problems and issues in implementing the clinical-research model of practice in educational and clinical settings . Journal of Education for Social Work, 16, 60-66.
10.
Dolan, M. M., & Vourlekis, M. M. (1983). A field project: Single-subject design in a public social service agency. Journal of Social Service Research, 6, 29-43.
11.
Gambrill, E. D., & Barth, R. P. (1980). Single-case study designs revisited . Social WorkResearch & Abstracts, 16, 15-20.
12.
Gill, S. J., & Zimmerman, N. R. (1990). Racial/ethnic and gender bias in the courts: A stakeholder-focused evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 11, 103-108.
13.
Gingerich, W. J. (1984). Generalizing single-case evaluation from classroom to practice. Journal of Education for Social Work, 20, 74-82.
14.
Gingerich, W. J. (1990). Rethinking single-case evaluation. In L. Videka-Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.), Advances in clinical social work research (pp. 11-24). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers Press.
15.
Gingerich, W. J., Schirtzinger, J., & Hoffman, D. L. ( 1991). MY ASSISTANT: Design and development of a computer-assisted case management system. Paper presented at the HUSITA-2 Conference, New Brunswick, NJ.
16.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Hayes, S. C., Nelson, R. O., & Jarrett, R. B. ( 1987). The treatment utility of assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
18.
Heineman, M. B. (1981). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research. Social Service Review, 55, 371-397.
19.
Howe, G. S. (1974). Casework self-evaluation: A single subject approach. Social Service Review, 48, 1-24.
20.
Jayaratne, S. (1991). Clinical significance: Problems and new developments. In L. Videka-Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.), Advances in clinical social work research (pp. 271-285). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers Press.
21.
Jayaratne, S., & Levy, R. L. (1979). Empirical clinical practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Kagle, J. D. (1983). Using single-subject measures in practice decisions: Systematic documentation or distortion?Arete, 7, 1-9.
23.
Kazdin, A. E. (1974). Reactive self-monitoring: The effects of response desirability, goal setting, and feedback. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 704-716.
24.
Kirk, S. (1986). The chronically mentally ill and social-problem research. In J. P. Bowker & A. Rubin (Eds.), Studies on chronic mental illness: New horizons for social work researchers (pp. 187-203). Washington, DC: Council on Social Work Education.
25.
Kopp, J. (1988). Self-monitoring: A literature review of research and practice. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 24, 8-20.
26.
Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Ngyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2, 197-207.
27.
Levy, R. L., & Olson, D. G. (1979). The single-subject methodology in clinical practice: An overview. Journal of Social Service Research, 3, 25-49.
28.
Lipinski, D. P., Black, J. L., Nelson, R. O., & Ciminero, A. R. (1975). The influence of motivational variables on the reactivity and reliability of self-recording . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 637-646.
29.
Mutschler, E. (1984) Evaluating practice: A study of research utilization by practitioners. Social Work, 29, 332-337.
30.
Nelsen, J. C. (1981). Issues in single-subject research for nonbehaviorists. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 20, 3-10.
31.
Nelson, R. O., Lipinski, D. P., & Black, J. L. ( 1975). The effects of expectancy on the reactivity of self-recording . Behavior Therapy, 6, 337-349.
32.
Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization-focused research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
33.
Richey, C. A., Blythe, B. J., & Berlin, S. B. ( 1987). Do social workers evaluate their practice?Social Work Research & Abstracts, 23, 14-20.
34.
Robinson, E.A.R., Bronson, D., & Blythe, B. J. ( 1988). An analysis of the implementation of single-case evaluation by practitioners. Social Service Review, 62, 285-301.
35.
Rothman, J. (1980). Social R&D: Research and development in the human services. New York : Columbia University Press.
36.
Russell, M. N. (1990). Consumer satisfaction: An investigation of contributing factors. Journal of Social Service Research, 13, 43-56.
37.
Saleeby, D. (1979). The tension between research and practice: Assumptions of experimental paradigm. Clinical Social Work Journal, 7, 267-284.
38.
Stake, R. (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
39.
Thomas, E. J. (1975). Uses of research methods in interpersonal practice. In N. A. Polansky (Ed.), Social work research: Methods for the helping professions (pp. 254-283). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Thomas, E. J. (1978). Research and service in single-case experimentation: Conflicts and choices. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 14, 20-31.
41.
Thomas, E. J. (1984) Designing interventions for the helping professions. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.
42.
Thomas, E. J. (1990). Modes of practice in developmental research. In L. Videka-Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.), Advances in clinical social work research (pp. 202-217). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers Press.
43.
Thyer, B. A. (1991). Guidelines for evaluating outcome studies on social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 1, 76-91.
44.
Tripodi, T. (1991). Attribution theory and clinical significance. In L. Videka-Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.), Advances in clinical social work research (pp. 286-289). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers Press.
45.
Tripodi, T., & Epstein, I. (1980). Research techniques for social workers . New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
Welch, G. J. (1983). Will graduates use single-subject designs to evaluate their casework practice?Journal of Education for Social Work, 19, 42-46.
47.
Witkin, S. L. (1991). Empirical clinical practice: A critical analysis. Social Work, 36, 97-192.
48.
Wodarski, J. S. (1981). The role of research in clinical practice: A practical approach to the human services . Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
