The Development of the Social Work Attitude Test for Students (SWATS-15)

Abstract

Objectives:

Ensuring that the students of social work possess the ideal attitude is critical for shaping effective social work professionals for the future. In this regard, the present research documents the development of the 15-item Social Work Attitude Test for Students (SWATS-15).

Method:

Using a sample of 263 social work students in India and using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the final set of items of the tool was established.

Results:

The tool has shown a high degree of validity and reliability across various statistical measurements (McDonald's Omega = 0.92).

Conclusion:

SWATS-15 has multiple real-world uses. While it can be used as a tool to identify whether an applicant for a social work program has the ideal attitude necessary for the program, it can also be used by organizations working with vulnerable and sensitive communities to select student interns.

Keywords

social work attitude test for students SWATS-15 IFSW tool development factor analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of Social Work Boards. (2011). ASWB examination candidate handbook. https://dchealth.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/doh/publication/attachments/Social_Work_ASWB_National_Exam_Testing_Information.pdf

Association of Social Work Boards. (2026). About ASWB: About the association of social work boards. https://www.aswb.org/about-aswb/

Atkinson

T. M.

Rosenfeld

B. D.

Sit

Mendoza

T. R.

Fruscione

Lavene

Shaw

Hay

Cleeland

C. S.

Scher

H. I.

Breitbart

W. S.

Basch

(2011). Using confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate construct validity of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.05.008

Baginsky

Manthorpe

(2015). Trainees’ views of the step up to social work programme. Social Work Education, 34(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.956073

Bald

Wyllie

Martínez Herrero

M. I.

(2022). Criminal records and public sector professional education: The role of criminal background checks in admissions to social work courses in England. Probation Journal, 69(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505221116037

Boateng

G. O.

Neilands

T. B.

Frongillo

E. A.

Melgar-Quiñonez

H. R.

Young

S. L.

(2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Campillo

Corbella

Gelpi

Martinez

Viciana

M. A.

Alonso

(2020). Development and validation of the scale of perception of respect for and maintenance of the dignity of the inpatient [CuPDPH]. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 15, Article 100553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100553

Cheung

G. W.

Cooper-Thomas

H. D.

Lau

R. S.

Wang

L. C.

(2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Chigangaidze

R. K.

Mafa

Simango

T. G.

Mudehwe

(2023). Establishing the relevance of the Ubuntu philosophy in social work practice: Inspired by the Ubuntu World Social Work Day, 2021 celebrations and the IFSW and IASSW’s (2014) global definition of social work. International Social Work, 66(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728221078374

10.

Choudhury

Ganguli

Gaulé

(2023). Top talent, elite colleges, and migration: Evidence from the Indian Institutes of Technology. Journal of Development Economics, 164, Article 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103120

11.

Coyle

J. P.

Carter

I. M.

Leslie

D. R.

(2011). BSW program admission policies: Is there empirical support for what we do? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31(5), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2011.615277

12.

Cree

Morrison

Clapton

Levy

Ingram

(2018). Selecting social work students: Lessons from research in Scotland. Social Work Education, 37(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1423050

13.

de Jong

Tamminga

S. J.

de Boer

A. G. E. M.

Frings-Dresen

M. H. W.

(2016). The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): A pre-test study. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), Article 194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1440-4

14.

DeVellis

R. F.

(2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed., pp. 95–96). Sage. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2419996

15.

Elson

(1954). First principles of Jane Addams. Social Service Review, 28(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1086/639499

16.

Emerson

R. W.

(2017). Likert scales. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(5), 488–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1711100511

17.

Goretzko

Pham

T. T. H.

Bühner

(2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3510–3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2

18.

Goudarzian

A. H.

(2023). Challenges and recommendations of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A narrative review from a nursing perspective. Journal of Nursing Reports in Clinical Practice, 1(Issue 3), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.32598/JNRCP.23.44

19.

Goulden

(2025). ‘A lot of social workers don’t seem to understand or realize the harm that they cause’: Disabled young people’s experiences with sexual well-being in social work practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 55(2), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae171

20.

Halek

Holle

Bartholomeyczik

(2017). Development and evaluation of the content validity, practicability and feasibility of the innovative dementia-oriented assessment system for challenging behaviour in residents with dementia. BMC Health Services Research, 17, Article 554. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2469-8

21.

Hauben

Hung

Hsieh

W.-Y.

(2017). An exploratory factor analysis of the spontaneous reporting of severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 8(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098616670799

22.

Hendra

Hill

(2019). Rethinking response rates: New evidence of little relationship between survey response rates and nonresponse bias. Evaluation Review, 43(5), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X18807719

23.

Hsu

Y.-C.

‘Kenneth’ Huang

T.-H.

Verma

Mauri

Nourbakhsh

Bozzon

(2022). Empowering local communities using artificial intelligence. Patterns, 3(3), Article 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100449

24.

Hughes

McNabb

Ashley

McKechnie

Gremillion

(2020). Selection of social work students: A literature review of selection criteria and process effectiveness. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 18(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.526752541694911

25.

IBM. (2022, September 13). Downloading IBM SPSS Amos 29 [CT738,CT763,CT761,CT762]. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/downloading-ibm-spss-amos-29-0

26.

IBM. (2024). Downloading IBM SPSS Statistics 30. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/downloading-ibm-spss-statistics-30

27.

International Federation of Social Workers. (2018a). Global social work statement of ethical principles. https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles/

28.

International Federation of Social Workers. (2018b). IFSW permanent committee on ethical issues executive committee report. https://www.ifsw.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/12-Report-from-IFSW-Ethics-Commission-1.pdf

29.

Kim

Millsap

(2014). Using the Bollen-Stine bootstrapping method for evaluating approximate fit indices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(6), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.947352

30.

Kim

J. H.

(2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087

31.

Knutsson

Rydström

Reimer

Nyberg

Hagell

(2010). Interpretation of response categories in patient-reported rating scales: A controlled study among people with Parkinson’s disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(1), Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-61

32.

Levinger

Segev

(2018). Admission and completion of social work programs: Who drops out and who finishes? Journal of Social Work, 18(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316651998

33.

Huang

Feng

(2020). Construction and confirmatory factor analysis of the core cognitive ability index system of ship C2 system operators. PLoS One, 15(8), Article e0237339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237339

34.

Liu

Wong

Liu

(2023). Why do social workers leave? A moderated mediation of professionalism, job satisfaction, and managerialism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), Article 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010230

35.

Madadizadeh

Bahariniya

(2025). Tutorial on internal consistency assessment by Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 41, Article 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100568

36.

McCormick

M. J.

(1961). A legacy of values. Social Casework, 42(8), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438946104200804

37.

National Association of Social Workers. (2026). Code of ethics: English. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English

38.

Nazirova

Borbala

(2024). Values, attitudes and the behaviour paradigm: A systematic literature review. Journal of Human Values, 30(2), 214–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858241236902

39.

Padilla

M. A.

Divers

(2016). A comparison of composite reliability estimators. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415593776

40.

Petersén

A. C.

(2024). New insights on motives for choosing social work as a career: Answers from students and newly qualified social workers. Social Work Education, 43(3), 702–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.2139823

41.

Primi

Santos

De Fruyt

John

O. P.

(2019). Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(3), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12168

42.

The R Foundation. (2026). R: The R project for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/

43.

Robinson

Phillips

Quennerstedt

(2020). Human rights education: Developing a theoretical understanding of teachers’ responsibilities. Educational Review, 72(2), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1495182

44.

Romero-Tena

Llorente-Cejudo

Puig-Gutiérrez

Barragán-Sánchez

(2021). The pandemic and changes in the self-perception of teacher digital competences of infant grade students: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), Article 4756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094756

45.

Roulston

Cleak

Hayes

McFadden

O'Connor

Shore

(2023). To fail or not to fail: Enhancing our understanding of reasons why social work students failed practice placements (2015–2019). Social Work Education, 42(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2021.1973991

46.

Rönkkö

Cho

(2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614

47.

Sarhan

T. M. A.

Sloan

Rotabi-Casares

K. S.

Hamad Alfalasi

S. J.

(2022). Social work codes of ethics in the Arab countries of Western Asia: A comparison to the IFSW global statement of ethical principles. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(5), 3003–3023. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab190

48.

Schreiber

J. B.

(2021). Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(5), 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027

49.

Sewpaul

Henrickson

(2019). The (r)evolution and decolonization of social work ethics: The global social work statement of ethical principles. International Social Work, 62(6), 1469–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819846238

50.

UCLA. (2024). A practical introduction to factor analysis: Exploratory factor analysis. https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/seminars/introduction-to-factor-analysis/a-practical-introduction-to-factor-analysis/

51.

University Grants Commission. (2026). NAAC: Accreditation status. http://naac.gov.in/index.php/en/2-uncategorised/32-accreditation-status

52.

Watkins

M. W.

(2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807

53.

World Medical Association. (2024). WMA Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/

54.

Yusoff

(2019). ABC of response process validation and face validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(3), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.3.6