Reactance peaks during adolescence, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. This study examined whether a mentalization-based group intervention (MBI-G) could reduce reactance and aggression among adolescents.
Method
60 high-reactance adolescents (33 girls, aged 11–15) from junior high schools in Beijing were randomly assigned to either a six-session weekly MBI-G or a school-based psychoeducational control group. Measures of mentalization, reactance, and aggression were collected at pre-intervention, mid-intervention, and post-intervention.
Results
Significant Time × Group interactions emerged for mentalization (p = .027) and reactance (p = .003). The intervention group showed greater improvements in mentalization and more substantial decreases in reactance than the controls. Post-intervention aggression was also significantly lower in the intervention group (p = .033). Analysis showed that increases in mentalization from baseline to mid-intervention mediated the intervention's effect on reductions in reactance from baseline to post-intervention.
Discussion
MBI-G appears effective in reducing adolescent reactance by enhancing mentalization.
AdkinsT.LuytenP.FonagyP. (2018). Development and preliminary evaluation of family minds: A mentalization-based psychoeducation program for foster parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(8), 2519–2532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1080-x
2.
AdlerA.Gervinskaitė-PaulaitienėL.ČekuolienėD.BarkauskienėR. (2021). Childhood maltreatment and adolescents’ externalizing problems: Mentalization and aggression justification as mediators. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 30(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2020.1783733
3.
Aival-NavehE.Rothschild-YakarL.KurmanJ. (2019). Keeping culture in mind: A systematic review and initial conceptualization of mentalizing from a cross-cultural perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 26(4), e12300. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101757
BatemanA.FonagyP. (2016). Mentalization-based treatment for personality disorders: A practical guide. Oxford University Press.
7.
BatemanA.FonagyP.CampbellC.LuytenP.DebbanéM. (2023). Cambridge guide to mentalization-based treatment (MBT). Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
9.
BrehmJ. W.BrehmS. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
10.
ChartrandT. L.DaltonA. N.FitzsimonsG. J. (2007). Nonconscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.003
11.
Chelouche-DwekG.FonagyP. (2025). Mentalization-based interventions in schools for enhancing socio-emotional competencies and positive behaviour: A systematic review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(4), 1295–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02578-5
12.
Choi-KainL. W.GundersonJ. G. (2008). Mentalization: Ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(9), 1127–1135. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081360
13.
CollinsW. A.LaursenB.MortensenN.LuebkerC.FerreiraM. (1997). Conflict processes and transitions in parent and peer relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743554897122003
14.
DengY.LiY.ZhangS.XuJ.TongW.ZengX. (2025). Why does a grateful mind prevent an aggressive hand? Perspective taking mediated the relation between gratitude and two types of aggression among individuals in the general population and prisoners.The Journal of Positive Psychology, 20(3), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2024.2365257
15.
DengY.YanM.ChenH.SunX.ZhangP.ZengX.LiuX.LyeY. (2016). Attachment security balances perspectives: Effects of security priming on highly optimistic and pessimistic explanatory styles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01269
16.
DengY.ZhangY.ZhuY. (2023). Autonomy need-based experiences and hope and fear components of autonomy strength: Investigating the longitudinal and reciprocal effects over a two-year period. Personality and Individual Differences, 202, 111964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111964
17.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
20.
FonagyP.AllisonE. (2012). What is mentalization? The concept and its foundations in developmental research. In MidgleyN.VrouvaI. (Eds.), Minding the child: Mentalization-based interventions with children, young people and their families (pp. 11–34). Routledge.
21.
FonagyP.GergelyG.JuristE.TargetM. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. Other Press.
22.
FonagyP.LuytenP.Moulton-PerkinsA.LeeY.-W.WarrenF.HowardS.GhinaiR.FearonP.LowyckB. (2016). Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: The reflective functioning questionnaire. PLoS One, 11(7), e0158678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
23.
FuJ.LuoZ.YangS (2009). Revision of reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire in Chinese middle school students. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (S4), 199–202.
24.
GirouxS.GuayM.-C. (2022). Assessing the contribution of callous–unemotional traits and affective empathy to aggressive behaviour among teenagers hosted in a youth protection centre. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(5), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1929977
25.
GrandpreJ.AlvaroE. M.BurgoonM.MillerC. H.HallJ. R. (2003). Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: A theoretical approach. Health Communication, 15(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1503_6
26.
HanS.LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70023-2
27.
HauschildS.KasperL.VolkertJ.SobanskiE.TaubnerS. (2023). Mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with conduct disorder (MBT-CD): A feasibility study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(12), 2611–2622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02113-4
28.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
29.
HongS. M.FaeddaS. (1996). Refinement of the hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001014
30.
HuX. (2023). The relationship between rebellious psychology and academic delay in junior high school students: A study on the regulation of social support and its intervention [Master’s thesis, Bohai University]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27190/d.cnki.gjzsc.2023.000243
KarterudS. (2015). Mentalization-Based Group Therapy (MBT-G): A theoretical, clinical, and research manual. Oxford University Press Oxford.
33.
LiQ.LiuZ. (2025). Parental psychological control and adolescent smartphone addiction: Roles of reactance and resilience. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02477-7
34.
LiQ.WeiS.LiuZ. (2024). How is parental psychological control associated with adolescent mental health in economically disadvantaged areas? The serial mediating role of psychological reactance and problematic smartphone use. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1458378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1458378
35.
LiuM.-C.ChangJ. C.LeeC.-S. (2021). Interactive association of maternal education and peer relationship with oppositional defiant disorder: An observational study. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03157-7
36.
LuytenP.CampbellC.AllisonE.FonagyP. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355
37.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
38.
MalekiB. (2025). Effectiveness of mentalization-based therapy on the aggression and emotional regulation difficulties of depressed male adolescents. Current Psychology, 44(16), 13924–13932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08131-0
39.
MillerC. H.QuickB. L. (2010). Sensation seeking and psychological reactance as health risk predictors for an emerging adult population. Health Communication, 25(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410231003698945
40.
MissottenL. C.LuyckxK.BranjeS.Van PetegemS. (2018). Adolescents’ conflict management styles with mothers: Longitudinal associations with parenting and reactance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10964-017-0634-3
41.
MüllerS.WendtL. P.SpitzerC.MasuhrO.BackS. N.ZimmermannJ. (2022). A critical evaluation of the reflective functioning questionnaire (RFQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(5), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1981346
42.
QuickB. L.StephensonM. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207300427
43.
RaineA.DodgeK.LoeberR.Gatzke-KoppL.LynamD.ReynoldsC.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LiuJ. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20115
44.
ReavesS.McMahonS. D.DuffyS. N.RuizL. (2018). The test of time: A meta-analytic review of the relation between school climate and problem behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.01.006
45.
RichardsA. S.BessarabovaE.BanasJ. A.BernardD. R. (2022). Reducing psychological reactance to health promotion messages: Comparing preemptive and postscript mitigation strategies. Health Communication, 37(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1839203
46.
RosenbergB. D.SiegelJ. T. (2018). A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Science, 4(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091
47.
RossouwT. I.FonagyP. (2012). Mentalization-based treatment for self-harm in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(12), 1304–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.018
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
49.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L.VansteenkisteM. (2016). Autonomy and autonomy disturbances in self-development and psychopathology: Research on motivation, attachment, and clinical process. In CicchettiD. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology (Vol. 1, pp. 385–438). John Wiley & Sons.
50.
ShenL. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x
SkinnerE. A.EdgeK. (2002). Self-determination, coping and development. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), Self-determination theory: Extensions and applications (pp. 297–337). University of Rochester Press.
SteindlC.JonasE. (2012). What reasons might the other one have? Perspective taking to reduce psychological reactance in individualists and collectivists. Psychology (Irvine. Calif, 3(12a), 1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.312A170
TaubnerS.HauschildS.KasperL.KaessM.SobanskiE.GablonskiT. C.Schröder-PfeiferP.VolkertJ. (2021). Mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with conduct disorder (MBT-CD): Protocol of a feasibility and pilot study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 7(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00876-2
58.
Van PetegemS.SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.BeyersW. (2015). Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory. Child Development, 86(3), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12355
59.
VansteenkisteMaartenRyanRichard M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359
60.
WangS.HuH.WangX.DongB.ZhangT. (2021). The hidden danger in family environment: The role of self-reported parenting style in cognitive and affective empathy among offenders. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 588993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588993
61.
Wray-LakeL.CrouterA. C.McHaleS. M. (2010). Developmental patterns in decision-making autonomy across middle childhood and adolescence: European American parents’ perspectives. Child Development, 81(2), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01420.x
62.
XuL.LiuG.XiaJ.JuX.WangX. (2017). Reliability and validity of Chinese version of reflective functioning questionary-8. Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health, 17(01), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2017.01.004
63.
YueF.YuanS.XiaoG.JiangX. (2024). Relationship between trait anger and mentalization of college students: Moderated mediation model. China Journal of Health Psychology, 32(02), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2024.02.028
64.
ZhangC.LuoY.WenD.ZhengH. (2025). Psychological reactance and deviant behaviors in adolescents: The chain mediation effect of deviant peer affiliation and deviant group identity. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 23(05), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.05.009645
65.
ZhangW.JiaS.ChenG.ZhangW. (2014). Reliability and validity of reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire in college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(02), 260–263. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.02.022
66.
ZhouH. (2024). A practical study on self-awareness improvement of children with reverse psychology involved in growth group: Take the “Know Me” group of School H in Wuhan as an example [Master’s thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27157/d.cnki.ghzku.2024.000898
