A co-researching environment describes the conditions that enable equitable partnership: who is involved, how power is shared, how knowledge is generated, and how outputs are embedded into wider systems. Using a practice research partnership on food insecurity in Aotearoa New Zealand as an illustrative case, this article shows how “co-researching environments” can guide the conduct and outputs of collaborative research. Data were collected through six virtual workshops and reflective dialogues with 25 practice partners and analyzed using hybrid thematic analysis, informed by a Practice Ecosystems Framework. Analysis highlighted four adaptive processes (co-creating, co-learning, co-producing, and co-shaping) through which collaboration was enacted, and three community-led strategies (negotiating, embedding, innovating) to address food insecurity. While strategies addressing food insecurity are context-specific, it requires a collective approach. “Co-researching environments” outline conditions to respond to increasing calls for collaborative knowledge generation that aligns research and service development.
AustinM. J.McBeathB.XuB.MuurinenH.NatlandS.RooseR. (2024). Organizational supports for practice research: Illustrations from an international practice research collaborative. Research on Social Work Practice, 34(6), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315231225138
2.
BangM.VossoughiS. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193. https:/doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
3.
CoenraadM.MillsK.RangelA.BurkeQ.DunbarK. (2024). Collaborative sense-making: Strategies for co-researching in a research-practice partnership. In LindgrenR.AsinoT. I.KyzaE. A.LooiC. K.KeifertD. T.SuárezE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 2299–2300). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2024.600257
4.
DembeleL.NathanS.CarterA.CostelloJ.HodginsM.SinghR.CullenP. (2024). Researching with lived experience: A shared critical reflection between co-researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241257945
5.
FisherM. (2020). From research question to practice research methodology. In JoubertL.WebberM. (Eds.), The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 43–56). Routledge.
6.
FouchéC. (2015). Practice research partnerships in social work: making a difference. Policy Press.
7.
FouchéC.ChubbL. A. (2020). Results to practice: Navigating complexities to create meaningful impact. In The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 455–466). Routledge.
8.
HarperS. L.Berrang-FordL.CarcamoC.CunsoloA.EdgeV. L.FordJ. D.LlanosA.LwasaS.NamanyaD. B. (2019). The indigenous climate–food–health nexus: Indigenous voices, stories, and lived experiences in Canada, Uganda, and Peru. In MasonL. R.RiggJ. (Eds.), People and climate change: Vulnerability, adaptation, and social justice (pp. 184–207). Oxford Academic.
JurisJ.ScrivanoR. M.SpeidelE.BaileyL.JarrottS. E. (2021). The development of a satellite food pantry through community-based participatory action research. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 9(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.31304
13.
Karnieli-MillerO.StrierR.PessachL. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308329306
MoranN.WebberM.KaurH. D.MorrisD.NgamabaK.NunnV.ThomasE.ThompsonK. J. (2020). Co-producing practice research: The connecting people implementation study. In The routledge handbook of social work practice research (1st ed, Vol. 1, pp. 353–367). Routledge.
16.
SeivwrightA. N.CallisZ.FlatauP. R. (2020). Food insecurity and socioeconomic disadvantage in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 559–611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020559
SmythS. J.WebbS. R.PhillipsP. W. (2021). The role of public-private partnerships in improving global food security. Global Food Security, 31, 100588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100588
19.
SwainJ. (2018). A hybrid approach to thematic analysis in qualitative research: Using a practical example. In Sage Research Methods Cases Part 2. Sage.
20.
WallcookS.DohrnI. M.DahlkvistU.DomeijY.GreenK.IsakssonG.GoliathI. (2024). Outputs from a model of co-research with older care-experienced people in Sweden to advance eldercare services. Research Involvement and Engagement, 10(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00650-7
21.
WesterbackF.MurtonenE.MetzJ.JulkunenI. (2020). Co-creation in research with young people. In The routledge handbook of social work practice research (1st ed, Vol. 1, pp. 382–395). Routledge.
22.
YlirukaL.HeinonenJ.Tapola-HaapalaM.IsokuorttiN. (2020b). Teaching practice research through partnerships with field educators, social work communities and university. In The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 231–242). Routledge.
23.
YlirukaL.PetreliusP.ErikssonP. (2020a). Translating ideas into practice: Research in national and local child welfare reform processes. In JoubertL.WebberM. (Eds.), The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 203–216). Routledge.
