Purpose: This study develops a Social Vulnerability Scale for Families (SVSF) in social assistance in Spain. Method: First, a systematic literature review and content validation were performed by experts in the field. The first version of the scale included risk and protective factors in the areas of economic situation, housing, health, intrafamilial relationships, sociocultural capital, and educational situation. Secondly, a first pre-pilot test was conducted, assessing 598 families living in relative poverty and participating in the social program entitled CaixaProinfancia. Finally, the psychometric properties of the SVSF were evaluated in a bigger sample of families (n = 1178). Both evaluations were performed by social workers. Results: The scale reliability was high; dimensionality analysis yielded two differentiated factors confirmed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: material vulnerability and immaterial vulnerability. Finally, high correlations were found among all the dimensions. Discussion: The SVSF is a validated multi-dimensional assessment method that facilitates social work practice.
AmendolaF.AlvarengaM. R. M.GasparJ. C.YamashitaC. H.de OliveiraM. A. C. (2011). Face validity of an index of family vulnerability to disability and dependence. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 45(spe2), 1736–1742. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342011000800017
2.
AmendolaF.MartinsM. R.LatorreM. R.CamposM. A. (2014). Development and validation of the family vulnerability index to disability and dependence (FVIDD). Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48(1), 80–88. https://doi. org/10.1590/S0080-623420140000100010
3.
AmendolaF.MartinsM. R.LatorreM. R.CamposM. A. (2017). Family vulnerability index to disability and dependence (FVI-DD), by social and health conditions. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 22(6), 2063–2071. https://doi. org/10.1590/1413-81232017226.03432016
4.
Ayuntamiento de Madrid. (2023). IGUALA. Índice de vulnerabilidad territorial agregado del Ayntamiento de Madrid. https://iguala.madrid.es/
5.
BarañanoM.SantiagoJ. (2023). Los arraigos dinámicos en las ciudades como soportes frente a la vulnerabilidad. Revista Española de Sociología, 32(4), a186. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2023.186
6.
BeckU. (2021). Theorising World Risk Society and Cosmopolitanism. Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuiñonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
8.
CivísM.RieraJ. (2007). La nueva pedagogía comunitaria. Un marco renovado para la acción sociopedagógica interprofesional. Nau llibres.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
11.
CruzM. A.De LunaM. X.ChávezV. (2022). Economic and social vulnerability because of Covid-19: Poverty and food security. Mercados y Negocios, 45, 69–92. https://doi.org/10.32870/myn.vi45.7660.g6724
12.
Díaz-VicarioA.ArmengolC.CastroD. (2019). Factors that hinder access to and persistence in post-compulsory education: A challenge for vulnerable groups in Spain. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 24(4), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2019.1654680
EklundG.SibiliaA.SalviA.AntofieT.-E.RodomontiD.SalariS.PoljansekK.MarziS.GyenesZ.CorbaneC. (2023). Towards a European wide vulnerability framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/353889
FantovaF. (2016). Nuevos enfoques para los servicios sociales ante la nueva realidad social. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, (33), 113–139.
18.
FatemiF.ArdalanA.AguirreB.MansouriN.MohammadfamI. (2017). Social vulnerability indicators in disasters: Findings from a systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.006
19.
FayersP. M.HandD. J. (2002). Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: An example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 165(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985x.02020
20.
FonsecaM. A.CrespoC.MccubbinL. D.AreiaN.RelvasA.-P. (2018). Psychometric study of the Portuguese version of the Family Distress Index (FDI). Families, Systems & Health, 36(2), 159–168. https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ffsh0000342
21.
FraserM. W.GalinskyM. J. (2010). Steps in intervention research: Designing and developing social programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(5), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509358424
22.
GarciaR. A.MatosR. (2009). A distribuição espacial da vulnerabilidade social das famílias brasileiras. Belo Horizonte, 9(9), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.29327/249218.9.9-9
23.
GerbingD. W.AndersonJ. C. (1988). An update paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimentionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172650
24.
Giménez-BertomeuV. M.Domenech-LópezY.Mateo-PérezM. A.de-Alfonseti-HartmannN. (2019). Empirical evidence for professional practice and public policies: An exploratory study on social exclusion in users of primary care social services in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234600
25.
GiménezV.MesquidaJ. M.ParraB.BoixadósA. (2019). El diagnòstic social en els serveis socials bàsics. Sèrie Benestar i Ciutadania, 2, Col·lecció Estudis. Diputació Barcelona.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). Pearson Education.
29.
IliyasuR.EtikanI. (2021). Comparison of quota sampling and stratified random sampling. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 10(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2021.10.00326
30.
KarayeI. M.HorneyJ. A. (2020). The impact of social vulnerability on COVID-19 in the U.S.: An analysis of spatially varying relationships. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(3), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.006
31.
KyriazosT. A.StalikasA. (2018). Applied psychometrics: The steps of scale development and standardization process. Psychology, 9(11), 2531–2560. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.911145
32.
LafuenteM.FauraU. (2012). Estudio de la vulnerabilidad a la exclusión social por comunidades autónomas en España 2005-2009. Investigaciones Regionales, (23), 105–124.
33.
LafuenteM.FauraU.LosaA. (2011). Medidas y caracterización de la vulnerabilidad a la exclusión social de los hogares en España. Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA, 12, 53–68.
34.
LaporteR.JouveE.DaguzanA.GentileS. (2019). Validation of a screening tool for social vulnerability in pediatrics. European Journal of Public Health, 29(Supplement 4), ckz185.603. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.603
35.
LongásJ.Cussó-ParcerisasI.DotrasP.AndrésT.RieraJ. (2023). La evaluación de la vulnerabilidad social en el contexto iberoamericano: Una revisión bibliográfica. OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 18(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.14198/obets.22210
36.
MahJ. C.PenwardenJ. L.PottH.TheouO.AndrewM. K. (2023). Social vulnerability indices: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16097-6
37.
MampaneM. R. (2020). The effect of a community-based social support program on the resilience of children from vulnerable families. Early Child Development and Care, 190(10), 1638–1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1670653
38.
ManzanoM. A.PagésE.SoléM. (2019). La DS-DIBA: Experiencia de la elaboración de una herramienta de valoración social y segmentación para los servicios sociales. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 32(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.5209/CUTS.58061
39.
Martínez de IbarretaC.RedondoR.RúaA. (2011). Impacto de las redes sociales de apoyo sobre la vulnerabilidad de los inmigrantes. Un análisis del caso español. Migraciones, (29), 61–94.
40.
MendesJ. M.TavaresA. O.SantosP. P. (2020). Social vulnerability and local level assessments: A new approach for planning. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 11(1), 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2019-0069
41.
Montoya-ArceB. J.Martínez-EspinosaA. (2018). Perspectivas teórico-metodológicas para el estudio de la vulnerabilidad social en los adultos mayores. Papeles de población, 24(98), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.22185/24487147.2018.98.41
42.
NavarroS. R.LarrubiaR. (2006). Indicadores para medir situaciones de vulnerabilidad social. Propuesta realizada en el marco de un proyecto europeo. Baetica: Estudios de Arte, Geografía e Historia, (28), 485–506.
43.
OlherB. S.MattosM. LBastosG.SaraivaM. D. (2018). Family Development Index (IDF) in the municipality of Viçosa, evolution between 1980 and 2010. INTERAÇÕES (Campo Grande), 19(3), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v19i3.1739
44.
OvejasC. (2008). Herramienta de diagnóstico e intervención social. Servicios Sociales y Política Social, (83), 47–68.
PrinsenC. A. C.MokkinkL. B.BouterL. M.AlonsoJ.PatrickD. L.de VetH. C. W.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN Guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(5), 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
47.
PuigC.RieraJ.LongásJ.Cussó-ParcerissasI.ÚcarX.LongásE.VilarJ.CivísM. (2013). Modelo de acción social Programa CaixaProinfancia. Obra Social ‘la Caixa’.
48.
RanciC. (2010). Social vulnerability in Europe. In RanciC. (Ed.), Social vulnerability in Europe (pp. 3–24). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245778_1
49.
RayaE. (2010). Aplicaciones de una herramienta para el diagnóstico y la investigación en exclusión social. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, (15), 189–194.
50.
RayaE.Garcia PulidoR. M.Real PascualM. J.Lascroz FumanalA. (2020). El diagnóstico social en la relación de ayuda: La experiencia de aplicación de la escala SiSo. Servicios Sociales y Política Social, XXXVII(122), 49–64.
51.
RimoldiS. M. L.ArcagniA.FattoreM.TerzeraL. (2022). Social and material vulnerability of the Italian municipalities: Comparing alternative approaches. Social Indicators Research, 161, 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02330-x
52.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5–15. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
53.
RuizC.CalderónI.JuárezJ. (2017). La resiliencia como forma de resistir a la exclusión social: Un análisis comparado de casos. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 29, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2017.29.09
54.
Sánchez-GonzálezD.Egea-JiménezC. (2011). Enfoque de vulnerabilidad social para investigar las desventajas socioambientales: Su aplicación en el estudio de los adultos mayores. Papeles de Población, 17(69), 151–185.
55.
SchmidtleinM. C.DeutschR. C.PiegorschW. W.CutterS. L. (2008). A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability Index. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 28(4), 1099–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01072.x
56.
SpielmanS. E.TuccilloJ.FolchD. C.SchweikertA.DaviesR.WoodN.TateE. (2020). Evaluating social vulnerability indicators: Criteria and their application to the social vulnerability index. Natural Hazards, 100, 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03820-z
57.
Suárez del ToroJ. M. (2008). El informe anual sobre la vulnerabilidad social de Cruz Roja española correspondiente a 2006. Servicios Sociales y Política Social, (81), 29–39.
58.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed). Allyn & Bacon.
TasnuvaA.HossainM. R.SalamR.IslamA. R. M. T.PatwaryM. M.IbrahimS. M. (2021). Employing social vulnerability index to assess household social vulnerability of natural hazards: An evidence from southwest coastal Bangladesh. Environment Development and Sustainability, 23(7), 10223–10245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01054-9
61.
TotenhagenC. J.LiX.WilmarthM. J.ArchuletaK. L.YorgasonJ. B. (2024). Do couples who play together stay together? A longitudinal dyadic examination of shared leisure, financial distress, and relationship outcomes. Family Process, 63(1), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12869
VanderWeeleT. J.DingP.MathurM. (2019). Technical considerations in the use of the E-value. Journal of Causal Inference, 7(2), 20180007. https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2018-0007
65.
Ventura-LeónJ. L.Caycho-RodríguezT. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: Un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625–627.
66.
WindingT. N.NohrE. A.LabriolaM.BieringK.AndersenJ. H. (2013). Personal predictors of educational attainment after compulsory school: Influence of measures of vulnerability, health, and school performance. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 41(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812467713
