This study aims to use solution-focused cognitive group intervention (SCGI), which combines cognitive behavioral therapy with solution-focused brief therapy, to improve the benefit finding of petitioners.
Method
This intervention includes six sessions and two follow-up tests (at three months and six months). Sixty-four petitioners (mean age = 44.31, standard deviation = 4.43) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (32 participants) and the control group (32 participants). The SCGI group aims to enhance benefit finding and reduce anxiety. Solution-focused thinking, strength knowledge, and strength use make up the intervention components.
Results
The intervention effectively improved participants’ benefit finding and reduced their anxiety, with long-term effects. The control group did not change. Network analysis indicates that strength use has the greatest influence in the network.
Discussion
For future research, it is imperative to focus on participants’ strengths to comprehend the efficacy mechanisms and enhance the intervention framework.
BeaucheminJ. D. (2018). Solution-focused wellness:A randomized controlled trial of college students. Health & Social Work, 43(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hly007
4.
BowerJ. E.LowC. A.MoskowitzJ. T.SepahS.EpelE. (2008). Benefit finding and physical health: Positive psychological changes and enhanced allostasis. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00038.x
CassidyT.McLaughlinM.GilesM. (2014). Benefit finding in response to general life stress: Measurement and correlates. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2014.889570
7.
ChengS.-T.ChanW. C.LamL. C. (2019). Long-term outcomes of the benefit-finding group intervention for Alzheimer family caregivers: A cluster-randomized double-blind controlled trial. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(9), 984–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.03.013
8.
ChengS.-T.MakE. P.FungH. H.KwokT.LeeD. T.LamL. C. (2017). Benefit-finding and effect on caregiver depression: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(5), 521. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000176
9.
CoserL. A. (2009). The Functions of Social Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
10.
DuanW.LiJ.MuW. (2018). Psychometric characteristics of strengths knowledge scale and strengths use scale among adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(7), 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917705593
11.
EpskampS.BorsboomD.FriedE. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
12.
EpskampS.CramerA. O.WaldorpL. J.SchmittmannV. D.BorsboomD. (2012). Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FriedE. I.CramerA. O. (2017). Moving forward:Challenges and directions for psychopathological network theory and methodology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 999–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617705892
16.
GovindjiR.LinleyP. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2007.2.2.143
17.
GrantA. M. (2017). Solution-focused cognitive-behavioral coaching for sustainable high performance and circumventing stress, fatigue, and burnout. Consulting Psychology Journal:Practice and Research, 69(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000086
18.
GrantA. M.CavanaghM. J.KleitmanS.SpenceG.LakotaM.YuN. (2012). Development and validation of the solution-focused inventory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.697184
19.
GrantA. M.GreenL. S.RynsaardtJ. (2010). Developmental coaching for high school teachers: Executive coaching goes to school. Consulting Psychology Journal:Practice and Research, 62(3), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019212
20.
HaslbeckJ. M.WaldorpL. J. (2018). How well do network models predict observations? On the importance of predictability in network models. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 853–861. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0910-x
21.
HeinzenE.SinnwellJ.AtkinsonE.GundersonT.DoughertyG.VotrubaP. (2021). Arsenal: An arsenal of ‘R’functions for large-scale statistical summaries. R package version 3.6.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arsenal
22.
HelgesonV. S.LopezL.MennellaC. (2009). Benefit finding among children and adolescents with diabetes. In ParkC. L. (Ed.), Medical illness and positive life change:Can crisis lead to personal transformation? ((1st ed, pp. 65–86). American Psychological Association.
23.
HelgesonV. S.ReynoldsK. A.TomichP. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.797
24.
HouR. (2020). Maintaining social stability without solving problems: Emotional repression in the Chinese petition system. The China Quarterly, 243, 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741019001528
25.
HuJ.BuH.LiuI. K. F.YuN. X. (2024). A cluster randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent positive psychological intervention: The potential mechanism of altruism. Research on Social Work Practice, 34(4), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315231179097
26.
HuJ.WuT. (2020). Emotional mobilization of Chinese veterans: Collective activism, flexible governance and dispute resolution. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(129), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1827356
27.
HuJ.WuT.FeiJ. (2018). Flexible governance in China: Affective care, petition social workers, and multi-pronged means of dispute resolution. Asian Survey, 58(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.4.679
28.
HuiZ.WangX.TengZ.ZouW.WangJ.JiP.WangM. (2024). The Chinese version of the general benefit finding scale (GBFS): Psychometric properties in a sample of college students. PloS one, 19(5), e0300064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300064
KalischR.CramerA. O.BinderH.FritzJ.LeertouwerI.LunanskyG.MeyerB.TimmerJ.VeerI. M.Van HarmelenA.-L. (2019). Deconstructing and reconstructing resilience: A dynamic network approach. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619855637
31.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
32.
LehmanP.PattonJ. (2010). The development of a solution-focused fidelity instrument. In FranklinC.TrepperT.GingerichW. J.McCollumE. (Eds.), Solution-focused brief therapy:From practice to evidence-informed practice (pp. 39–54). Oxford University Press.
33.
LiT.LeiJ.ParmakM. (2023). A solution-focussed cognitive group intervention for event anxiety in vulnerable children: A randomized controlled trial. Child & Family Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13092
34.
LinB. (2021). Dispute resolution and regime resilience in China: the fusion of the petition system and civic organizations [Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/3f050cef27e56ff5a0ce22f12fb1d895/
MinznerC. F. (2006). Xinfang:An alternative to formal Chinese legal institutions. Stanford Journal of International law, 42(1), 103–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606072498
37.
NealJ. W.NealZ. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12018
38.
PanJ. Y.ZhuangX. (2024). Adventure-based cognitive behavioral intervention for Hong Kong university students: A randomized controlled study. Research on Social Work Practice, 34(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315231163804
39.
QiaoanR.TeetsJ. C. (2020). Responsive authoritarianism in China–A review of responsiveness in Xi and Hu administrations. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 25(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09640-z
40.
R Core Team. (2024). R:A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/
41.
RodebaughT. L.TongeN. A.PiccirilloM. L.FriedE.HorensteinA.MorrisonA. S.GoldinP.GrossJ. J.LimM. H.FernandezK. C. (2018). Does centrality in a cross-sectional network suggest intervention targets for social anxiety disorder?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(10), 831. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000336
42.
RuskR. D.Vella-BrodrickD. A.WatersL. (2018). A complex dynamic systems approach to lasting positive change: The synergistic change model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1291853
43.
SpitzerR. L.KroenkeK.WilliamsJ. B.LöweB. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
44.
TeixeiraC. P.SpearsR.IyerA.LeachC. W. (2023). Qualified support for normative vs. no-n-normative protest: Less invested members of advantaged groups are most supportive when the protest fits the opportunity for status improvement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 106, 104454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104454
45.
TennenH.AffleckG. (2002). Benefit-finding and benefit-reminding. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 584–597). Oxford University Press.
46.
TheeboomT.BeersmaB.Van VianenA. E. M. (2015). The differential effects of solution-focused and problem-focused coaching questions on the affect, attentional control and cognitive flexibility of undergraduate students experiencing study-related stress. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1117126
47.
TongX.AnD.McGonigalA.ParkS.-P.ZhouD. (2016). Validation of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) among Chinese people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Research, 120, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.019
48.
UschnerD.SchindlerD.HilgersR.-D.HeussenN. (2018). Randomizer: An R package for the assessment and implementation of randomization in clinical trials. Journal of Statistical Software, 85(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v085.i08
49.
Van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK. (2011). Mice:Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1548–7660. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
50.
WongS. H.PengM. (2015). Petition and repression in China’s authoritarian regime: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 27–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004161
51.
YanH.YangJ.LuoC.ZhangL.TianY.CuiS.WuJ.ChuJ. (2023). Development and psychometric assessment of the benefit finding scale for Chinese older adults with chronic diseases. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 16(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20230105-03
52.
YangJ. (2017). Mental health in China: Change, tradition, and therapeutic governance. John Wiley & Sons.
53.
YangH.HaiT. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the solution-focused inventory in college students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 43(4), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12023
