Purpose: This study delves into the effects of labels, specifically crime-first language, on public attitudes toward adolescent girls within the juvenile legal system. Examining fictional vignettes depicting family conflict, the research explores whether the use of language influences the endorsement of punitive responses and if this effect varies across racial and ethnic lines. Method: A large online, statewide sample of adults (n = 1,791) was randomized to one of six vignettes. Results: Findings reveal that crime-first language, “accused of domestic battery,” is significantly associated with more punitive attitudes. We found no interaction effects between race and label. Although effect sizes were small, the study emphasizes the need to reconsider language choices to avoid perpetuating negative stereotypes and stigmatization. Discussion: Identifying and disseminating person-first language may be an important form of social work practice that can enhance current efforts on the Social Work Grand Challenge of promoting smart decarceration.
AizpuruaE.ApplegateB. K.BolinR. M.VukM.OuelletteH. M. (2020). The sins of the child: Public opinion about parental responsibility for juvenile crime. Children and Youth Services Review, 114, 105023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105023
2.
Arias-RiveraS.LorenceB.HidalgoV. (2022). Parenting skills, family functioning and social support in situations of child-to-parent violence: A scoping review of the literature. Journal of Family Violence, 37(7), 1147–1160.
3.
BernburgJ. G. (2019). Labeling theory. In KrohnM. D.HendrixN.HallG. P.LizotteA. J. (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (2nd ed., pp. 179–196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_10
4.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
5.
BolinR. M.ApplegateB. K.OuelletteH. M. (2021). Americans’ opinions on juvenile justice: Preferred aims, beliefs about juveniles, and blended sentencing. Crime and Delinquency, 67(2), 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719890273
6.
ChenG.EinatT. (2015). The relationship between criminology studies and punitive attitudes. European Journal of Criminology, 12(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814551211
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
CostelloeM. T.ArazanC.StengerM. (2018). Assessing the effect of social science education on punitive attitudes. Journal of Social Science Education, 17(3), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v17-i3-1828
9.
DavisA. (2017). Fighting for hope: The criminalization of trauma in justice-Involved girls’ lives and stories of resilience from a juvenile prison. (Publication number: 10616059) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman’s University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
10.
DenverM.PickettJ. T.BushwayS. D. (2017). The language of stigmatization and the mark of violence: Experimental evidence on the social construction and use of criminal record stigma. Criminology, 55(3), 664–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12145
11.
EdwardsJ. (2009). A lesson in unintended consequences: How juvenile legal and domestic violence reforms harm girls in violent family situations (and how to help them). University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 13(2), 219–242.
12.
EppersonM. W.Pettus-DavisC.GrierA.SawhL. (2018). Promote smart decarceration. In R., Fong, J. E. Lubeen, & R. P., Barth (Eds.), Grand challenges for social work and society (pp. 181–203). Oxford University Press.
13.
EppersonM. W.WilsonA. B.FedockG. (2021). The promise of research to advance smart decarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(1), 3–9.
14.
FryerR. G.LevittS. D. (2004). The causes and consequences of distinctively black names. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 767–805. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502180
HurwitzJ.PeffleyM. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111769
18.
IbabeI. (2020). A systematic review of youth-to-parent aggression: Conceptualization, typologies, and instruments. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 577757.
19.
LibermanA. M.KirkD. S.KimK. (2014). Labeling effects of first juvenile arrests: Secondary deviance and secondary sanctioning. Criminology, 52(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/crim.2014.52.issue-3
20.
MooreK. E.TangneyJ. PStuewigJ. B. (2016). The self-stigma process in criminal offenders. Stigma and Health, 1(3), 206–224.
21.
Navas-MartinezM. J.Cano-LozanoM. C. (2022). Profile of the victimized aggressor in child-to-parent-violence: Differences according to the type of victimization. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 22(2), 1–11.
22.
Nowakowski-SimsE. (2019). An exploratory study of childhood adversity and delinquency among youth in the context of child-to-parent and sibling-to-sibling violence. Journal of Family Social Work, 22(2), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2018.1496510
23.
O’HaraK. L.DuchschereJ. E.BeckC. J. (2017). Adolescent-to-parent violence: Translating research into effective practice. Adolescent Research Review, 2, 181–198.
24.
PayneB. K.GaineyR. R.TriplettR. A.DannerM. J. (2004). What drives punitive beliefs? Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.02.007
RestivoE.LanierM. M. (2015). Measuring the contextual effects and mitigating factors of labeling theory. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 116–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.756115
RosenmanE. TOlivellaS.ImaiK. (2023). Race and ethnicity data for first, middle, and surnames. Scientific Data, 10.
29.
ShafiqN.OhlssonI. M.MathiasP. (2016). Predictors of punitive attitudes among police officers. Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-04-2015-0025
30.
ShermanF. T. (2009). Reframing the response: Girls in the juvenile justice system and domestic violence. Juvenile and Family Justice Today, 18(1), 16–20.
31.
SilverJ. R.SilverE. (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000232
32.
SnyderH. N.McCurleyC. (2008). Domestic assaults by juvenile offenders. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
33.
SpinneyE.CohenM.FeyerhermW.StephensonR.YeideM.ShreveT. (2018). Disproportionate minority contact in the US juvenile legal system: A review of the DMC literature, 2001–2014, part I. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(5), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2018.1516155
34.
StelterM.DegnerJ. (2018). Recognizing Emily and Latisha: Inconsistent effects of name stereotypicality on the other-race effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 324370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00486
35.
StrausM. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/351733
36.
TaylorM. (2016). Adult earnings of juvenile delinquents: The interaction of race/ethnicity, gender, and juvenile legal status on future earnings. Justice Policy Journal, 13(2), 1–24.
37.
WelchK. (2007). Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207306870
38.
WelchK.ButlerL. F.GetzM. (2019). Saving children, damning adults? An examination of public support for juvenile rehabilitation and adult punishment. Criminal Justice Review, 44(4), 470–491.
