Incidents of self-harm present significant concerns in correctional facilities. Purpose: Developing interventions to address self-injury is beneficial to individuals who are incarcerated as well as the security personnel in charge of their care and custody. Method: Four 6-week animal-assisted dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills groups were provided to men and women incarcerated in a jail. Each group integrated two therapy dogs while participants utilized a workbook to assist in the application of DBT skills. A total of 23 participants completed the program. Results: Participants demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in self-harming behaviors. Discussion: All participants indicated that the presence of therapy dogs was helpful as they provided comfort/support, calming/coping, and focus. The receptivity to groups and the results offer support for enhancing treatment in correctional facilities.
ApplebaumK. L.SavageauJ. A.TrestmanR. L.MetznerJ. L.BaillargeonJ. (2011). A national survey of self-injurious behavior in American prisons. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.62.3.pss6203_0285
2.
BarkerE.KõlvesK.De LeoD. (2014). Management of suicidal and self-harming behaviors in prisons: Systematic literature review of evidence-based activities. Archives of Suicide Research, 18, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2013.824830
3.
BronsonJ.BerzofskyM. (2017). Indicators of Mental Health Problems Reported by Prisoners and Jail Inmates, 2011-12. U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/imhprpji1112.pdf
CarverC.S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief cope. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
CorletoD. (2018). Prison rehabilitation: The sociological, physiological, and psychological effects of animal-assisted interventions. Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science, 6(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.31979/THEMIS.2018.0608
9.
CresswellJ. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd edition.Sage Publications, Inc.
10.
Dixon-GordonK.HarrisonN.RoeschR. (2012). Non suicidal self-injury within offender populations: A systematic review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.667513
11.
Eaton-StullY.HotchkissJ.JonesJ.LilienF. (2021). Bereavement behind bars: Grief support groups with and without therapy dogs for incarcerated females. Bereavement: Journal of Grief and Responses to Death, 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54210/bj.2022.13
12.
Eaton-StullY.WrightC.DeAngelisC.ZambroskiA. (2019). Comparison of DBT skills groups with and without animal-assistance for incarcerated women with self-harm histories. Corrections, 6(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2019.1629849
13.
Eaton-StullY.WrightC.SpirnockC.VulakovichM. (2020). Animal-assisted stress-anxiety groups: Positive coping for men in prison. Journal of Mental Health & Social Behaviour, 2(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.33790/jmhsb1100123
14.
EkanemO. J.WoodsP. (2022). Effectiveness of nonsuicidal self-injury interventions among incarcerated women in correctional facilities and secure settings: An integrative review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 43(3), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2021.1967532
FournierA. K.GellerE. S.FortneyE. V. (2007). Human-animal interaction in a prison setting: Impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress, and social skills. Behavior and Social Issues, 16(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v16i1.385
17.
FrazierS. N.VelaJ. (2014). Dialectical behavior therapy for the treatment of anger and aggressive behavior: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.02.001
18.
Kunz-LomelinA.NordbergA. (2020). Assessing the impact of an animal-assisted intervention for jail inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1697786
19.
LanesE. C. (2011). Are the “worst of the worst” self-injurious prisoners more likely to end up in long-term maximum-security administrative segregation?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(7), 1034–1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10378494
20.
MarzanoL.HawtonK.RivlinA.SmithE. N.PiperM.FazelS. (2016). Prevention of suicidal behavior in prisons. Crisis, 37(5), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000394
21.
McDonaghD.TaylorK.BlanchetteK. (2002). Correctional adaptation of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for federally sentenced women. Forum on Corrections Research, 14(2), 36–39. https://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/forum/e142/142i_e.pdf
22.
McKay, M., Wood, J. C., & Brantley, J. (2007). The dialectical behavior therapy skills workbook: Practical DBT exercises for learning mindfulness, interpersonal effectiveness, emotion regulation, and distress tolerance. New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
23.
MercerJ.Williams DaviesE.CookM.BowesN. J. (2022). I feel happier in myself with the dogs”: The perceived impact of a prison animal programme for well-being. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 24(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-11-2021-0057
24.
MooreK. E.FolkJ. B.BorenE. A.TangneyJ. P.FischerS.SchraderS. W. (2018). Pilot study of brief dialectical behavior therapy skills group for jail inmates. Psychological Services, 15(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000105
SamplS.WakaiS.TrestmanR. L. (2010). Translating evidence-based practices from community to corrections: An example of implementing DBT-CM. The Journal of Behavior Analysis of Offender and Victim Treatment and Prevention, 2(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100463
SheltonD.BaileyC.BanfiV. (2017). Effective interventions for self-harming behaviors and suicide within the detained offender population: A systematic review. Journal for Evidence-based Practice in Correctional Health, 1(2), 45–94. Article 3. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/jepch/vol1/iss2/3
29.
StrimpleE. O. (2003). A history of prison inmate-animal interaction programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203255212
