Evolution of the Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) Program Through the Application of a Social Work Lens

Abstract

Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) is a court-mandated program intended to engage adults with serious mental illness who have challenges with voluntary treatment adherence. AOT programs are designed to promote outpatient treatment participation, reduce emergency care, and decrease justice involvement. Research has found AOT programs to be effective in reducing hospitalizations and justice involvement. Yet, concerns have been raised, including limiting individual autonomy and self-determination and overrepresentation of individuals from BIPOC backgrounds. This article describes the evolution the AOT Houston Model. Through applying the social work lens, this innovative model builds on AOT strengths and addresses limitations. The Houston AOT Model has five goals guided by the core tenets of client empowerment and self-determination. This Model prioritizes six elements including housing, employment, access to public benefits, transportation, service continuity, and care coordination/communication. Implications for practice and policy are presented with strategies for successful implementation of comprehensive AOT programs in other jurisdictions.

Keywords

Assisted Outpatient Treatment AOT serious mental illness SMI civil commitment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

21st Century Cures Act. (2016). Public Law No. 114–255. (2016). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ255/PLAW-114publ255.pdf.

California Assembly Bill 1421. Chapter 1017 Code Sections, 5345-5349.5 (2002). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/01-02/bill/asm/ab_1401-1450/ab_1421_cfa_20020814_103454_sen_comm.html.

Cornwell

J. K.

Deeney

(2003). Exposing the myths surrounding preventive outpatient commitment for individuals with chronic mental illness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 9(1-2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.9.1-2.209

Cripps

S. N.

Swartz

M. S.

(2018). Update on Assisted Outpatient Treatment. Current Psychiatry Reports, 20(12), 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0982-z

Gearing

R. E.

El-Bassel

Ghesquiere

Baldwin

Gillies

Ngeow

(2011). Major ingredients of fidelity in psychosocial intervention assessment: A scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementation. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.007

Hiday

V. A.

(2003). Outpatient commitment: The state of empirical research on its outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 9(1-2), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.9.1-2.8

Hutchison

E. D.

(2018). Dimensions of human behavior: Person and environment. Sage Publications.

Kendra's Law (1999/2006). New York Mental Hygine Law, Title B § 9.60 et seq. (1999 & rev. 2006). https://newyork.public.law/laws/n.y._mental_hygiene_law_section_9.60.

Lamb

H. R.

Weinberger

L. E.

(2017). Understanding and treating offenders with serious mental illness in public sector mental health. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 35(4), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2292

10.

Meldrum

M. L.

Kelly

E. L.

Calderon

Brekke

J. S.

Braslow

J. T.

(2016). Implementation status of Assisted Outpatient Treatment programs: A national survey. Psychiatric Services, 67(6), 630–635. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500073

11.

Munetz

M. R.

Ritter

Teller

J. L. S.

Bonfine

(2014). Mental health court and Assisted Outpatient Treatment: Perceived coercion, procedural justice, and program impact. Psychiatric Services, 65(3), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.002642012

12.

Munetz

M. R.

Ritter

Teller

J. L. S.

Bonfine

(2019). Association between hospitalization and delivery of Assisted Outpatient Treatment with and without Assertive Community Treatment. Psychiatric Services, 70(9), 833–836. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800375

13.

Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014. (2014). Sect. 218(b), Public Law 11393 Apr1, 2014 Congressional RecordVol.160. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/4302.

14.

Robbins

P. C.

Petrila

LeMelle

Monahan

(2006). The use of housing as leverage to increase adherence to psychiatric treatment in the community. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0037-3

15.

Schneeberger

A. R.

Huber

C. G.

Lang

U. E.

Muenzenmaier

K. H.

Castille

Jaeger

Seixas

Sowislo

Link

B. G.

(2017). Effects of Assisted Outpatient Treatment and health care services on psychotic symptoms. Social Science & Medicine, 175, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.007

16.

Seabury

S. A.

Axeen

Pauley

Tysinger

Schlosser

Hernandez

J. B.

, …, & Goldman

D. P.

(2019). Measuring the lifetime costs of serious mental illness and the mitigating effects of educational attainment. Health Affairs, 38(4), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05246

17.

Starks

S. L.

Kelly

E. L.

Castillo

E. G.

Meldrum

M. L.

Bourgois

Braslow

J. T.

(2022). Client outreach in Los Angeles County’s Assisted Outpatient Treatment program: Strategies and barriers to engagement. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(7), 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731520949918

18.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2020). FY 2020 Assisted Outpatient Treatment grant program for individuals with serious mental illness. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/grants/pdf/aot_foa_final.pdf.

19.

Swanson

Swartz

Van Dorn

R. A.

Monahan

McGuire

T. G.

Steadman

H. J.

Robbins

P. C.

(2009). Racial disparities in involuntary outpatient commitment: Are they real? Health Affairs, 28(3), 816–826. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.816

20.

Swartz

M. S.

Swanson

J. W.

Steadman

H. J.

Robbins

P. C.

Monahan

(2009). New York State Assisted Outpatient Treatment program evaluation. Duke University School of Medicine. https://omh.ny.gov/omhweb/resources/publications/aot_program_evaluation/.

21.

Swartz

M. S.

Wagner

H. R.

Swanson

J. W.

Hiday

V. A.

Burns

B. J.

(2002). The perceived coerciveness of involuntary outpatient commitment: Findings from an experimental study. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(2), 207–217.

22.

Torrey

E. F.

Zdanowicz

(2001). Outpatient commitment: What, why, and for whom. Psychiatric Services, 52(3), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.337

23.

Wagner

H. R.

Swartz

M. S.

Swanson

J. W.

Burns

B. J.

(2003). Does involuntary outpatient commitment lead to more intensive treatment? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 9(1–2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.9.1-2.145

24.

Worthington

K. A.

(2009). Kendra’s Law and the rights of the mentally ill: An empirical peekbehind the courts’ legal analysis and a suggested template for the New York StateLegislature’s reconsideration for renewal in 2010 note. Cornell Journal of Law and PublicPolicy, 19(1), 213–242. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/cjlpp19&i=215 .