Objectives: Strengths-based approaches to case management for people with mental illness have been widely used in Western countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Strengths Model Case Management (SMCM) among mental health clients in Hong Kong. Method: Two hundred and nine service clients were recruited from three Integrated Community Centres. Multiple measures related to recovery progress (e.g., Recovery Assessment Scale) were reported by both the clients and caseworkers before intervention and at 6 and12 months post-recruitment. Results and conclusion: Although there were no significant differences in improvement of most outcomes between the SMCM and control groups, the recovery scores of the SMCM group remained stable over time regardless of age, and also middle-aged participants (i.e., 40–59 years old) in the SMCM group achieved higher recovery scores over time than those in the control group. Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN) 12617001435370.
American Psychological Association. (2003). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
2.
BarryK. L.ZeberJ. E.BlowF. C.ValensteinM. (2003). Effect of strengths model versus assertive community treatment model on participant outcomes and utilization: Two-year follow-up. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.2975/26.2003.268.277
BjörkmanT.HanssonL.SandlundM. (2002). Outcome of case management based on the strengths model compared to standard care: A randomised controlled trial. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 37(4), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001270200008
5.
BriandC.RoebuckM.ValléeC.Bergeron-LeclercC.KrupaT.DurbinJ.AubryT.GoschaR.LatimerE. (2022). Implementation of strengths model case management in seven mental health agencies in Canada: Direct-service practitioners’ implementation experience. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13696
6.
ChangW. C.WongC. S.LamL. C.LeeE. H.ChenE. Y.ChanW. C.NgR. R. M.HungS. F.CheungE. F. C.ShamP. C.ChiuH. F. K.LamM.ChiangT. P.LauJ. T. F.Van OsJ.LewisG.BebbigtonP. (2015). Prevalence, psychosocial and physical health correlates of psychotic disorders in Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Mental Health Morbidity Survey. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41(1), S135. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCHBUL/SBV010/57
7.
ChopraP.HamiltonB.CastleD.SmithJ.MileshkinC.DeansM.WynneB.PriggG.ToomeyN.WilsonM. (2009). Implementation of the strengths model at an area mental health service. Australasian Psychiatry, 17(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560802666083
ConradK. J.YagelkaJ. R.MattersM. D.RichA.WilliamsV.BuchananM. (2001). Reliability and validity of a modified Colorado Symptom Index in a national homeless sample. Mental Health Services Research, 3(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011571531303
10.
CookJ. A.SteigmanP.PickettS.DiehlS.FoxA.ShipleyP.MacFarlaneR.GreyD. D.Burke-MillerJ. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of peer-led recovery education using building recovery of individual dreams and goals through education and support (BRIDGES). Schizophrenia Research, 136(1-3), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.016
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
12.
DeaneF. P.GoffR. O.PullmanJ.SommerJ.LimP. (2019). Changes in mental health providers’ recovery attitudes and strengths model implementation following training and supervision. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(6), 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9885-9
13.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
15.
DurbinJ.AubryT.BarrettB.Bergeron-LeclercC.BriandC.GoschaR.KrupaT.RaeJ.RoebuckM.SetliffA.ScacciaJ.ValléeC.LatimerE. (2022). Implementing the strengths model of case management: assessing practice three years after initial implementation. Community Mental Health Journal. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-022-00968-0
16.
ElliottG.KaoS.GrantA. M. (2004). Mattering: Empirical validation of a social-psychological concept. Self and Identity, 3(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000119
17.
FeltonA.WrightN.StaceyG. (2017). Therapeutic risk-taking: A justifiable choice. British Journal of Psychiatry Advances, 23(2), 81–88.
18.
FukuiS.GoschaR.RappC. A.MabryA.LiddyP.MartyD. (2012). Strengths model case management fidelity scores and client outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 63(7), 708–710. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100373
FukuiS.ShimizuY.RappC. A. (2021). A cross-cultural study of recovery for people with psychiatric disabilities between US and Japan. Community Mental Health Journal, 48(6), 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-012-9513-2
21.
GelkopfM.LapidL.WerbeloffN.LevineS.TelemA.Zisman-IlaniY.RoeD. (2016). A strengths-based case management service for people with serious mental illness in Israel: A randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Research, 241, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.106
22.
GiffortD.SchmookA.WoodyC.VollendorfC.GervainM. (1995). Recovery assessment scale. Illinois Department of Mental Health.
23.
GoschaR. J. (2020). Strengths model case management: Moving strengths from concept to action. In A. N. Mendenhall & M. M. Carney (Eds.), Rooted in strengths celebrating strengths perspective in social work (pp. 165–186). University of Kansas, School of Social Welfare.
24.
Hasson-OhayonI.RoeD.YanosP. T.LysakerP. H. (2015). The trees and the forest: Mixed methods in the assessment of recovery based interventions’ processes and outcomes in mental health. Journal of Mental Health, 25(6), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1101419
25.
HatcherR. L.GillaspyJ. A. (2006). Development and validation of a revised short version of the working alliance inventory. Psychotherapy Research, 16(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500352500
Hong Kong Government (2013). Fact sheet – rehabilitation. Information Services Department.
28.
HsuS.YuC. K. C. (2017). A Hong Kong study of working alliance inventory short form–therapist. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 8(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2017.1313285
29.
HsuS.ZhouR. D. H.YuC. K. C. (2016). A Hong Kong validation of working alliance inventory–short form–client. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 7(1-2), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2016.1193036
30.
HuiK. Y.LeungC. W.NgM. C.YuW.LauE.CheungS. (2015). Effectiveness of strengths-based case management for people with mental health problems in Hong Kong. Advances in Social Work, 16(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.18060/18428
31.
IBM, Corp. (2021). SPSS Statistics version 28 [Computer Software].
32.
IbrahimN.MichailM.CallaghanP. (2014). The strengths based approach as a service delivery model for severe mental illness: A meta-analysis of clinical trials. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0243-6
33.
KisthardtW. (1994). An empowerment agenda for case management research: Evaluating the strengths model from the consumer’s perspective. In M. Harris & H. Bergman (Eds.), Case management for mentally ill patients: Theory and practice (pp. 112–125). Harwood.
34.
KrabbenborgM. A.BoersmaS. N.BeijersbergenM. D.GoschaR.WolfJ. (2015). Fidelity of a strengths-based intervention used by Dutch shelters for homeless young adults. Psychiatric Services, 66(5), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300425
35.
KrabbenborgM. A.BoersmaS. N.WolfJ. R. (2013). A strengths based method for homeless youth: Effectiveness and fidelity of Houvast. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-359
36.
LamL. C. W.WongC. S. M.WangM. J.ChanW. C.ChenE. Y. H.NgR. M. K.HungS. F.CheungE. F. C.ShamP. C.ChiuH. F. K.LamM.ChangW. C.LeeE. H. M.ChiangT. P.LauJ. T. F.Van OSJ.LewisG.BebbingtonP. (2015). Prevalence, psychosocial correlates and service utilization of depressive and anxiety disorders in Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Mental Morbidity Survey (HKMMS). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(9), 1379–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1014-5
37.
LatimerE.AubryT.BarrettB.Bergeron-LeclercC.BriandC.DurbinJ.GoschaR.KrupaT.RoebuckM.ValléeC.SetliffA.YauckM. (2022). Association between fidelity to the strengths model of case management and client outcomes: A quasi-experimental study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 12. Advance online publication. http://dx.https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000519
38.
MaciasC.FarleyO. W.JacksonR.KinneyR. (1997). Case management in the context of capitation financing: An evaluation of the strengths model. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 24(6), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042831
39.
MaciasC.KinneyR.FarleyO. W.JacksonR.VosB. (1994). The role of case management within a community support system: Partnership with psychosocial rehabilitation. Community Mental Health Journal, 30(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207486
40.
MakW. W.WuC. F. (2006). Cognitive insight and causal attribution in the development of self-stigma among individuals with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 57(12), 1800–1802. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2006.57.12.1800
41.
McCollM. A.DaviesD.CarlsonP.JohnstonJ.MinnesP. (2001). The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(4), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.22195
42.
Mindhk. (2022). Integrated Community Centre for Mental Wellness. Mind.org.hk.
43.
ModrcinM.RappC. A.PoertnerJ. (1988). The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11(4), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(88)90043-2
44.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT. (2011). Beyond multilevel regression modeling: Multilevel analysis in a general latent variable framework. In J. Hox & J. Robert (Eds.), Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 15–40). Routledge.
45.
NgJ. Y.NtoumanisN.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC.DeciE.RyanR.DudaJ.WilliamsG. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309
46.
OadesL. G.AndersonJ. (2012). Recovery in Australia: Marshalling strengths and living values. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2012.660623
47.
RappC. A.ChamberlainR. (1985). Case management services for the chronically mentally ill. Social Work, 30(5), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/30.5.417
48.
RappC. A.GoschaR. J. (2012). The strengths model: A recovery-oriented approach to mental health services. Oxford University Press.
49.
RappC. A.WintersteenR. (1989). The strengths model of case management: Results from twelve demonstrations. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099515
50.
RoebuckM.AubryT.Manoni-MillarS. (2021). A qualitative study of the working alliance in the strengths model of case management with people with severe mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal, 58(5), 944–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-021-00903-9
51.
RoebuckM.LatimerE.Bergeron-LeclercC.BriandC.DurbinJ.GoschaR.KrupaT.SetliffA.ValléeC.AubryT. (2022). The working alliance as a mediator between fidelity to strengths model case management and client outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 7. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202100387
52.
RyanC. S.ShermanP. S.JuddC. M. (1994). Accounting for case manager effects in the evaluation of mental health services. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 965–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.5.965
53.
SalzerM. S.BrusilovskiyE. (2014). Advancing recovery science: Reliability and validity properties of the recovery assessment scale. Psychiatric Services, 65(4), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300089
54.
SAS Institute. (2021). JMP Pro version 16 [Computer Software].
55.
SchuetzN.MendenhallA. N.GrubeW. (2019). Strengths model for youth case management: Professionals’ perceptions of model impact on clients. Social Work in Mental Health, 17(4), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2018.1563024
56.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
57.
ShepherdG.BoardmanJ.SladeM. (2008). Making recovery a reality. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
58.
SnyderC. R.SympsonS. C.YbascoF. C.BordersT.BabyakM.HigginsR. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321
59.
SongL. Y.ShihC. Y. (2014). Implementing a strengths-based model in facilitating the recovery of people with psychiatric disability. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 24(1-2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2014.885207
60.
StanardR. P. (1999). The effect of training in a strengths model of case management on client outcomes in a community mental health center. Community Mental Health Journal, 35(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018724831815
61.
TangJ. P. S.LiuT.LuS.SingC. Y.SzeL. C. Y.LumT. Y. S.TseS. (2022). ‘It was the deepest level of companionship’: Peer-to-peer experience of supporting community-dwelling older people with depression - a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 443. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03121-4
62.
TeagueG. B.MueserK. T.RappC. A. (2012). Advances in fidelity measurement for mental health services research: Four measures. Psychiatric Services, 63(8), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100430
63.
TewJ.RamonS.SladeM.BirdV.MeltonJ.Le BoutillierC. (2011). Social factors and recovery from mental health difficulties: A review of the evidence. British Journal of Social Work, 42(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr076
64.
TongM. (2011). The client-centered integrative strengths-based approach: Ending longstanding conflict between social work values and practice. Canadian Social Science, 7, 15–22.
65.
TseS.DivisM.LiY. B. (2010). Match or mismatch: Use of the strengths model with Chinese migrants experiencing mental illness: Service user and practitioner perspectives. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 13(3), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487761003670145
66.
TseS.NgC. S. M.YuenW. W. Y.LoI. W. K.FukuiS.GoschaR. J.WanE.WongS.ChanS. K. (2021). Process research: Compare and contrast the recovery-orientated strengths model of case management and usual community mental health care. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02964-8
67.
TseS.NgS. M. C.YuenW. Y. W.FukuiS.GoschaR. J.LoW. K. I. (2019). Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of strengths model case management (SMCM) with Chinese mental health service users in Hong Kong. BMJ Open, 9(5), E026399.
68.
TseS.TsoiE. W.HamiltonB.O’HaganM.ShepherdG.SladeM.WhitleyR.PetrakisM. (2016). Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: A critical review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 62(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764015623970
69.
TsoiE. W.TseS.CandaE. R.GoschaR. J.LoI. W. (2022). The meaning of “strengths” for strengths-based mental health practice in Hong Kong Chinese culture: A qualitative exploratory study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 45(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000476
70.
TsoiE. W.TseS.YuC. H.ChanS. K.WanE.WongS.LiuL. (2019). A nonrandomized controlled trial of strengths model case management in Hong Kong. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(5), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731518772142
71.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
72.
WagenmakersE. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(5), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105
73.
WassersteinR. L.LazarN. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
WeickA.RappC.SullivanW. P.KisthardtW. (1989). A strengths perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34(4), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/34.4.350
76.
WilkinsonL. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
77.
YuC. H. (2014). Dancing with the data: The art and science of data visualization. LAP.
YuC. H. (in press). Data mining and exploration: From traditional statistics to modern data science. CRC Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
