Far less prevalent in intervention research for justice involved or other mandated clients is the advent of synchronous online cognitive-behavioral group intervention (SOC-BGI). Purpose: The purpose of the study was to provide an effectiveness-oriented evaluation regarding the feasibility of SOC-BGI facilitated by licensed clinical social workers. Method: The study used a pre-experimental design (N = 41) with four observations including a 12-month follow-up. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate longitudinal comparisons. Results: On the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Contemplation subscale, from Baseline to posttest, the participants had a significant improvement (p = .004) and a moderate Hedge’s g effect size of -.54. From baseline to 12-month follow-up, there was a significant reduction in self-reported Diagnostic Statistical Manual 5 substance use symptoms (t = 4.68, df = 29, p < .001) and a large effect (Hedges’ g = .84). Discussion: Study applications, limitations, and strengths are discussed.
AlthubaitiA. (2016). Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 211-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S104807
2.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – 5 (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
3.
BeckJ. S (2021). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Author.
4.
BishopF. M. (2014). An integrate REBT-based approach to the treatment of addicted offenders. In TafrateR. C.MitchellD. (Eds.), Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 233–251). John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BrownT. R. (2021). Treating addiction in the clinic, not the courtroom: Using neuroscience and genetics to abandon the failed war on drugs. Indiana Law Review, 54(1), 29–77. https://doi.org/10.18060/25502
6.
CampbellD.,T.StanleyJ., C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Company.
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally.
9.
DelgadilloJ.PayneS.GilbodyS.GodfreyC.GoreS.JessopD.DaleV. (2011). How reliable is depression screening in alcohol and drug users? A validation of brief and ultra-brief questionnaires. Journal of Affective Disorders, 134(1–3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.017
10.
DelgadilloJ.PayneS.GilbodyS.GodfreyC.GoreS.JessopD.DaleV. (2012). Brief case finding tools for anxiety disorders: Validation of GAD-7 and GAD-2 in addictions treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 125(1–2), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.03.011
11.
DelgadilloJ.BöhnkeJ. R.HughesE.GilbodyS. (2016). Disentangling psychopathology, substance use and dependence: A factor analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0988-1
12.
Di MaggioI. (2016). Progettazione professionale e vulnerabilità: Il ruolo di alcune risorse di Life Design in persone con Disturbo da Uso di sostanza [life design and vulnerability: The role of some life design resources in people with substance use disorder]. SIO-Societa Italiana Orientamento.
13.
Di MaggioI.MontenegroE.LittleT. D.NotaL.GinevraM. C. (2021). Career adaptability, hope, and life satisfaction: An analysis of adults with and without substance use disorder. Journal of happiness studies23, 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00405-1
14.
DobsonK. S. (2012). Cognitive therapy. American Psychological Association.
15.
DumM.PickrenJ.SobellL. C.SobellM. B. (2008). Comparing the BDI-II and the PHQ-9 with outpatient substance abusers. Addictive Behaviors, 33(2), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.09.017
KinkadeP.LeoneM. C. (1992). Probation and the drunk driver: A cost of being `MADD. Federal Probation, 56(2), 6.
18.
KennedyF. M. (2017). Motivational-enhanced prevention education and risk perception in first-time driving while intoxicated offenders [ProQuest Information & Learning]Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences And Engineering78(6).
19.
KoehlerJ. A.HumphreysD. K.AkoensiT. D.Sánchez de RiberaO.LöselF. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of European drug treatment programmes on reoffending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(6), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.804921
LinehanJ. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. The Guilford Press.
22.
LuomaJ. B.KohlenbergB. S.HayesS. C.BuntingK.RyeA. K. (2008). Reducing self-stigma in substance abuse through acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, manual development, and pilot outcomes. Addiction Research & Theory, 16(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350701850295
23.
MarlattG. A. (1978). Craving for alcohol, loss of control, and relapse: A cognitive-behavioral analysis. In NathanP. E., MarlattG. A.LØbergT. (Eds.), Alcoholism: New directions in behavioral research and treatment (pp. 271–314). Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2874-2_11
24.
MarlattG. A. (1998). Highlights of harm reduction: A personal report from the First National Harm Reduction Conference in the United States. In MarlattG. A. (Ed.), Harm reduction: Pragmatic strategies for managing high-risk behaviors (pp. 3–29). The Guilford Press.
25.
MarshallS. (1996). The characteristics of cognitive behaviour therapy. In MarshallS.TurnbullJ. (Eds.), Cognitive behaviour therapy: An introduction to theory and practice (pp. 29–54). Baillière Tindall.
26.
MartinsonR. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35(l), 22–54.
27.
MaschiT.LiebowitzG. S.KillianM. L. (2018). Conceptual and historical overview of forensic social work. In MaschiT.LeibowitzG. S. (Eds.), Forensic social work: Psychosocial and legal issues across diverse populations and settings (2nd ed., pp. 3–30). Springer Publishing Company.
MillerP. G.CurtisA.SønderlundA.DayA.DrosteN. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 41(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2014.966199
30.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
31.
MitchellD.SimourdD. J.TafrateR. C. (2014). Introduction: Critical issues and challenges facing forensic CBT practitioners. In TafrateR. C.MitchellD. (Eds.), Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 1-10). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118589878.ch1
32.
MooreK. E.OberleitnerL.PittmanB. P.RobertsW.VerplaetseT. L.HackerR. L.McKeeS. A. (2020). The prevalence of substance use disorders among community-based adults with legal problems in the US. Addiction Research & Theory, 28(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2019.1613524
33.
MueserK.T.NoordsyD.L.DrakeR.E.FoxL. (2003). Integrated treatment for dual disorders: A guide to effective practice. Guilford Press.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.DanielL. G. (2002). A framework for reporting and interpreting internal consistency reliability estimates. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069052
36.
ParkJ.-Y.WuL.-T. (2019). Trends and correlates of driving under the influence of alcohol among different types of adult substance users in the United States: a national survey study. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 509. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6889-8
37.
SimpsonH. M. (1987). Community-based approaches to highway safety: Health promotion and drinking-driving. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 20(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-8716(87)90073-1
38.
TafrateR. C.MitchellD.SimourdD. J. (2018). CBT with justice-involved clients: Interventions for antisocial and self-destructive behaviors. Guilford Press.
39.
WalkerL. E.ShapiroD. L.AklS. (2020). Introduction to forensic psychology: Clinical and social psychological perspectives (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44470-9
40.
WangJ.SiegalH. A.FalckR. S.CarlsonR. G. (2001). Factorial structure of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale among crack-cocaine drug users. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(2), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_6
