Inclusive Practice for Children with Special Education Needs: Training for Social Workers

Abstract

Purpose: The study evaluated the effectiveness of a training program for social workers to reduce their negative perceptions on children with special education needs (SEN), enhance their self-efficacy for inclusive practice, and promote their competencies in helping these children in Hong Kong. Method: A prospective quasi-experimental design was adopted in the evaluation, with 58 social workers (74% females) joining the program (the intervention group) and 39 (56.4% females) who did not join the program (the control group). Results: Participants of the intervention group showed a significant decrease in negative perceptions towards children with SEN and an increase of self-efficacy for inclusive practice and competencies after participating in the program when compared with the control group. Discussion: The study provides encouraging evidence on the effectiveness of a training program for promoting social workers’ self-efficacy and competencies for inclusive practice, which is essential for social work intervention for children with SEN.

Keywords

inclusive practice strengths-based perspective special education needs stigma quasi-experimental design social work training

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

A. C.

Armstrong

Spandagou

(2010). Inclusive Education: International policy and practice. Sage.

Asamoah

Tam

C. H. L.

Cudjoe

(2021). A systematic review of the roles of social workers in inclusive education for children with disabilities. International Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872820971707.

Chao

C. N. G.

Forlin

F. C.

(2016). Improving teaching self-efficacy for teachers in inclusive classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(11), 1142–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1155663.

Deng

Poon‐McBrayer

K. F.

(2012). Reforms and challenges in the era of inclusive education: the case of China. British Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2012.00551.x.

Emanuelsson

(2005). Inclusive education in some Western European countries: Different policy rhetorics and school realities. In Mitchell

(Ed.), Contextualizing inclusive education (pp. 130–154). Routledge.

Erikson

E. H.

(1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Farrell

(2000). The impact of research on developments in inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/136031100284867.

Farrell

Dyson

Polat

Hutcheson

Gallannaugh

(2007). Inclusion and achievement in mainstream schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250701267808.

Hastings

R. P.

Brown

(2002). Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self‐efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 46(Pt 2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00378.x.

10.

Heflinger

C. A.

Hinshaw

S. P.

(2010). Stigma in child and adolescent mental health services research: understanding professional and institutional stigmatization of youth with mental health problems and their families. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 37(1–2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0294-z.

11.

Hornby

(2015). Inclusive special education: Development of a new theory for the education of children with special education needs and disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12101.

12.

Jordan

J. A.

Dyer

(2017). Psychological well‐being trajectories of individuals with dyslexia aged 3–11 years. Dyslexia: the Journal of the British Dyslexia Association, 23(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1555.

13.

Kauffman

J. M.

Badar

(2014). Instruction, not inclusion, should be the central issue in special education: an alternative view from the USA. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 17(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.9782/2159-4341-17.1.13.

14.

Kauffman

J. M.

Hallahan

D. P.

(2005). The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon (2nd ed.) PRO-ED.

15.

Kellison

Bussing

Bell

Garvan

(2010). Assessment of stigma associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Psychometric evaluation of the ADHD Stigma Questionnaire. Psychiatry Research, 178(2), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.022.

16.

Kirst-Ashman

K.K.

(2010). Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare: Critical Thinking Perspectives (3rd ed.). Brooks/Cole.

17.

Klassen

A. F.

Miller

Fine

(2004). Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics, 114(5), Article e541–547. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-0844.

18.

Kline

R. B.

(2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

19.

Kozleski

E. B.

Artiles

A. J.

Waitoller

F. R.

(2011). Introduction: equity in inclusive education: historical trajectories and theoretical commitments. In Artiles

A. J.

Kozleski

E. B.

Waitoller

F. R.

(Eds.), Inclusive Education (pp. 1–14). Harvard University Press.

20.

Kwan

Cheung

J. C. S.

(2017). Social work initiatives for the inclusion of students with special education needs. Practice, 29(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2016.1211260.

21.

Loreman

Deppeler

Harvey

(2011). Inclusive education: Supporting diversity in the classroom. Allen & Unwin.

22.

Mitchell

(2005). Contextualizing inclusive education. Routledge.

23.

Müller

A. K.

Fuermaier

A. B.

Koerts

Tucha

(2012). Stigma in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 4(3), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-012-0085-3.

24.

Orsati

F. T.

Causton-Theoharis

(2013). Challenging control: Inclusive teachers’ and teaching assistants’ discourse on students with challenging behaviour. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(5), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.689016.

25.

Peters

(2002). Inclusive education in accelerated and professional development schools: A case-based study of two school reform efforts in the USA. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6(4), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110210143716.

26.

Robinson

(2017). Effective inclusive teacher education for special education needs and disabilities: Some more thoughts on the way forward. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.09.007.

27.

Rose

C. A.

Monda-Amaya

L. E.

Espelage

D. L.

(2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361247.

28.

Saleebey

(2011). Some basic ideas about the strengths perspective. Social work Treatment: Interlocking Theoretical Approaches, 5, 477–4850.

29.

Salend

S. J.

(2011). Creating Inclusive Classrooms: effective and reflective practices (7th ed.). Pearson.

30.

Schroeder

J. H.

Cappadocia

M. C.

Bebko

J. M.

Pepler

D. J.

Weiss

J. A.

(2014). Shedding light on a pervasive problem: A review of research on bullying experiences among children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(7), 1520–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-2011-8.

31.

Sharma

Loreman

Forlin

(2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x.

32.

Stevens

J.P.

(2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

33.

Thyer

B. A.

(1995). Promoting an empiricist agenda within the human services: An ethical and humanistic imperative. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(95)00010-w.

34.

Thyer

B.A.

(2002). Principles of evidence-based practice and treatment development. In Roberts

A.R.

Green

G.J.

(Eds.), Social workers’ desk reference (pp. 739–742).

35.

Thyer

B.A.

Kazi

M.A.F.

(Eds.), (2003). International perspectives on evidence-based practice in social work. Venture Press.

36.

United Nations Educational (2015). Scientific and Cultural OrganizationIncheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. UNESCO)UNESCO.

37.

Van Breukelen

G. J.

(2013). ANCOVA versus CHANGE from baseline in nonrandomized studies: The difference. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(6), 895–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.831743.

38.

Ward

Raphael

Clark

Raphael

(2016). Involving people with profound and multiple learning disabilities in social work education: Building inclusive practice. Social Work Education, 35(8), 918–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1239705.

39.

Winkens

van Breukelen

G. J.

Schouten

H. J.

Berger

M. P.

(2007). Randomized clinical trials with a pre-and a post-treatment measurement: repeated measures versus ANCOVA models. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 28(6), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2007.04.002.