Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this invited paper, we critique Barth and colleagues’ (2021). “Research to Consider While Effectively Re-Designing Child Welfare Services” paper that presents 10 commonly held misconceptions in child welfare to provide a foundation for child welfare system reform. We argue that research alone cannot guide the reform of the child welfare system. Rather, we argue that people with lived expertise in the child welfare system and programs must be involved in all parts of collaborations in order to re-design child welfare. Research has limitations and privileging it in setting any reform agenda and efforts is potentially dangerous. We conclude that for effective child welfare system re-design to occur, research-policy-practice partnerships must be built with people with lived expertise in the child welfare system and programs.

Keywords

child welfare reform social work research representation collaboration research-policy-practice partnerships lived expertise lived experience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barth

R. P.

Berrick

J. D.

Garcia

A. R.

Drake

Jonson-Reid

Gyourko

J. R.

Greeson

J. K.

(2021). Research to consider while effectively re-designing child welfare services. Research on Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211050000

Barth

R. P.

Jonson-Reid

Greeson

J. K.

Drake

Berrick

J. D.

Garcia

A. R.

Shaw

T.V.

Gyourko

J. R.

(2020). Outcomes following child welfare services: What are they and do they differ for black children? Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(5), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1814541

Berrick

J. D.

Young

E. W.

Cohen

Anthony

(2011). ‘I am the face of success’: Peer mentors in child welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 16(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00730.x

Bryman

(1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology? British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/590553

Chaffin

Bard

Bigfoot

D. S.

Maher

E. J.

(2012). Is a structured, manualized, evidence-based treatment protocol culturally competent and equivalently effective among American Indian parents in child welfare? Child Maltreatment, 17(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559512457239

Checkoway

Richards-Schuster

(2003). Youth participation in community evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400103

Child Welfare Information Gateway . (2021). Child welfare practice to address racial disproportionality and disparity. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/issue-briefs/racial-disproportionality/

Children who age out of the foster care system hearing before the subcommittee on income security and family support of the committee on ways and means, U.S. House of Representatives, 110th Congress . (2007). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg43505/pdf/CHRG-110hhrg43505.pdf

Dettlaff

A. J.

Boyd

(2020). Racial disproportionality and disparities in the child welfare system: Why do they exist, and what can be done to address them? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 253-274.

10.

Dettlaff

A. J.

Rycraft

J. R.

(2008). Deconstructing disproportionality: Views from multiple community stakeholders. Child Welfare, 87(2), 37–58.

11.

Dettlaff

A. J.

Weber

Pendleton

Boyd

Bettencourt

Burton

(2020). It is not a broken system, it is a system that needs to be broken: The upEND movement to abolish the child welfare system. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(5), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1814542

12.

Drake

(1996). Consumer and worker perceptions of key child welfare competencies. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-7409(96)00004-7

13.

Drake

Jonson-Reid

Kim

(2017). Surveillance bias in child maltreatment: A tempest in a teapot. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), 971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14090971

14.

Feely

Raissian

K. M.

Schneider

Bullinger

L. R.

(2020). The social welfare policy landscape and child protective services: Opportunities for and barriers to creating systems synergy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220973566

15.

Font

S. A.

Berger

L. M.

Slack

K. S.

(2012). Examining racial disproportionality in child protective services case decisions. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2188-2200.

16.

Garcia

A. R.

DeNard

Ohene

Morones

S. M.

Connaughton

(2018). “I am more than my past”: Parents’ attitudes and perceptions of the Positive Parenting Program in Child Welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 286-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.023.

17.

Greeson

J. K.

Thompson

A. E.

Ali

Wenger

R. S.

(2015). It’s good to know that you got somebody that’s not going anywhere: Attitudes and beliefs of older youth in foster care about child welfare-based natural mentoring. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.015.

18.

Herrenkohl

T. I.

Scott

Higgins

D. J.

Klika

J. B.

Lonne

(2021). How COVID-19 is placing vulnerable children at risk and why we need a different approach to child welfare. Child Maltreatment, 26(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559520963916

19.

Hotez

P. J.

(2020). Anti-science extremism in America: Escalating and globalizing. Microbes and Infection, 22, 505-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.09.005.

20.

Howe

K. R.

(1992). Getting over the quantitative-qualitative debate. American Journal of Education, 100(2), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/444015

21.

Institute of Medicine and National Research Council . 2014. New directions in child abuse and neglect research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18331

22.

Ioannidis

J. P.

(2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

23.

Ioannidis

J. P.

(2008). Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology, 19(5), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7

24.

Israel

B. A.

Eng

Schulz

A. J.

Parker

E. A.

(Eds.). (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass.

25.

Janiaud

Agarwal

Tzoulaki

Theodoratou

Tsilidis

K. K.

Evangelou

Ioannidis

J. P.

(2021). Validity of observational evidence on putative risk and protective factors: appraisal of 3744 meta-analyses on 57 topics. BMC Medicine, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02020-6

26.

Jawetz

Mishraky-Javier

Hand

(2021). Our identities, ourselves: An anti-racist review on collecting accurate data on race and ethnicity. Center for the Study of Social Policy. https://cssp.org/resource/our-identities-ourselves/

27.

Merritt

D. H.

(2020). How do families experience and interact with CPS? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220979520

28.

Merritt

D. H.

(2021). Lived experiences of racism among child welfare-involved parents. Race and Social Problems, 13(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-021-09316-5

29.

Mirra

Garcia

Morrell

(2015). Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. Routledge.

30.

Padgett

D. K.

(2016). Qualitative methods in social work research. Sage.

31.

Putnam-Hornstein

Ahn

Prindle

Magruder

Webster

Wildeman

(2021). Cumulative rates of child protection involvement and terminations of parental rights in a California birth cohort, 1999–2017. American Journal of Public Health, 111(6), 1157-1163. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306214.

32.

Shaw

(2012). The positive contributions of quantitative methodology to social work research: A view from the sidelines. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511420171

33.

Slack

K. S.

Berger

L. M.

(2020). Who is and is not served by child protective services systems? Implications for a prevention infrastructure to reduce child maltreatment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220980691

34.

Smith

J. K.

(1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X012003006

35.

Thyer

B. A.

(2012). The scientific value of qualitative research for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 11(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011433928

36.

Tseng

Easton

J. Q.

Supplee

L. H.

(2017). Research‐practice partnerships: Building two‐way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2017.tb00089.x

37.

Useem

Brennan

LaValley

Vickery

Ameli

Reinen

Gill

C. J.

(2015). Systematic differences between Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses on the same topic: A matched pair analysis. Plos One, 10(12), e0144980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144980

38.

Wells

S. J.

Merritt

L. M.

Briggs

H. E.

(2009). Bias, racism and evidence-based practice: The case for more focused development of the child welfare evidence base. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(11), 1160–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.09.002

39.

Widom

C. S.

Czaja

S. J.

DuMont

K. A.

(2015). Intergenerational transmission of child abuse and neglect: Real or detection bias? Science, 347(6229), 1480–1485. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259917

40.

Zuberi

Bonilla-Silva

(2008). White logic, white methods. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Ensuring Authentic Representation and Collaboration Along with Research to Re-Design Child Welfare

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References