This article examines the benefits and challenges of engaging children in environmental citizen science, defined as science conducted by nonspecialists under the direction of professional scientists, to promote social good. Citizen science addresses two central elements of the social good model—environmental justice and inclusion with particular attention to diversity in age, gender, race/ethnicity, and social class in addressing environmental injustice that is more prevalent in underrepresented communities. This article evaluates how participation in citizen science projects focused on the environment (eco-citizen science) benefits the child’s development, contributes to science, and leads to commitment to environmental stewardship and justice as adults. Our work offers a novel contribution to the discourse on social good and social justice through explicitly calling for children to be included in environmental citizen science projects. We examine the benefits and challenges of involving children in scientific projects and discuss implications for policy, practice, and future research.
AdgerN.QuinnT.LorenzoniI.MurphyC.SweeneyJ. (2013). Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3, 112–117. doi:10.1038/nclimate1666
2.
AgyemanJ.BullardR. D.EvansB. (2002). Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space and Polity, 6, 77–90. doi:10.1080/13562570220137907
3.
AgyemanJ.EvansB. (2004). ‘Just sustainability’: The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain?The Geographical Journal, 170, 155–164. doi:10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00117.x
4.
BäckstrandK. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts. Global Environmental Politics, 3, 24–41.
5.
BasiagoA. (1995). Methods of defining ‘sustainability.’Sustainable Development, 3, 109–119. doi:10.1002/sd.3460030302
6.
BertoR. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4, 394–409. doi:10.3390/bs4040394
7.
BirdW. (2007). Natural thinking. A report for the RSPB: Investigating the links between the natural environment, biodiversity and mental health (1st ed., pp. 46–74). Cheltenham, England: RSPD.
8.
BolteG.TamburliniG.KohlhuberM. (2010). Environmental inequalities among children in Europe—evaluation of scientific evidence and policy implications. European Journal of Public Health, 20, 14–20.
9.
BonneyR.PhillipsT.BallardH.EnckJ. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?Public Understanding of Science, 25, 2–16.
Braun-FahrländerC.RiedlerJ.HerzU.EderW.WaserM.GrizeL.von MutiusE. (2002). Environmental exposure to endotoxin and its relation to asthma in school-age children. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 869–877. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020057
13.
BravemanP.GruskinS. (2003). Defining equity in health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57, 254–258.
ButlerL.ScammellM.BensonE. B. (2016). The Flint, Michigan water crisis: A case study in regulatory failure and environmental injustice. Environmental Justice, 9, 93–97. doi:10.1089/env.2016.0014
17.
BuytaertW.ZulkafliZ.GraingerS.AcostaLAlemieT. C.BastiaensenJ.…ZhumanovaM. (2014). Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: Opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Frontiers in Earth Science, 1–21. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2014.00026
18.
CaldarellaP.MerrellK. W. (1997). Common dimensions of social skills of children and adolescents: A taxonomy of positive behaviors. School Psychology Review, 26, 264–278.
19.
CapraF. (2015). The systems view of life: A unifying conception of mind, matter, and life. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 11, 242–249.
20.
CarsonR. (1965). The sense of wonder. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
ChavisD. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81.
23.
ChawlaL. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 6–23.
24.
ChengJ. C. H.MonroeM. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44, 31–49.
25.
ClappM.AuroraN.HerreraL.BhatiaM.WilenE.WakefieldS. (2017). Gut microbiota’s effect on mental health: The gut-brain axis. Clinics and Practice, 7, 987. doi:10.4081/cp.2017.987
26.
CobbE. (1977). The ecology of the imagination in childhood (pp. 1–39). Dallas, TX: Spring.
27.
CorburnJ. (2005). Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
DaviesL.FraderaR.RieschH.Lakeman-FraserP. (2016). Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme. BMC Ecology, 16, 17.
30.
Den BroederL.LemmensL.UysalS.KauwK.WeekenborgJ.SchönenbergerM.…WagemakersA. (2017). Public health citizen science; perceived impacts on citizen scientists: A case study in a low-income neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2, 1–17. doi:10.5334/cstp.89
31.
DickinsonJ. L.ShirkJ.BonterD.BonneyR.CrainR. L.MartinJ.…PurcellK. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 291–297.
32.
DierkingL.FalkJ. H. (2016). 2020 Vision: Envisioning a new generation of STEM learning research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 1–10.
33.
DillonJ.RickinsonM.TeameyK.MorrisM.ChoiM. Y.SandersD.Pauline BenefieldP. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87, 107–111.
34.
DresnerM.GillM. (1994). Environmental education at summer nature camp. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 35–41.
35.
DukeC.PorterJ. (2013). The ethics of data sharing and reuse in biology. BioScience, 63, 483–489.
36.
EinfeldA.CollinsD. (2008). The relationships between service-learning, social justice, multicultural competence, and civic engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 95–109. doi:10.1353/csd.2008.0017
EvansG. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59, 77.
40.
EylerA. A.Matson-KoffmanD.VestJ. R.EvensonK. R.SandersonB.ThompsonJ. L.…YoungD. R. (2002). Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in a diverse sample of women: The women’s cardiovascular health network project—Summary and discussion. Women and Health, 36, 123–134.
41.
Faber TaylorA.KuoF. E. (2006). Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence. In SpencerC.BladesM. (Eds.), Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces (pp. 124–140). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Faber TaylorA.KuoF. E. (2009). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal Attention Disorders, 12, 402–409. doi:10.1177/1087054708323000
43.
Faber TaylorA.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play setting. Environment and Behavior, 33, 54–77.
44.
Faber TaylorA.WileyA.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 30, 3–27.
45.
FlouriE.MidouhasE.JoshiH. (2014). The role of urban neighbourhood green space in children’s emotional and behavioural resilience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 179–186.
46.
FreitagA.PfefferM. J. (2013). Process, not product: Investigating recommendations for improving citizen science “success”. PloS one, 8, e64079.
47.
GilbertR.StevensonD.GirardetH.StrenR. (1996). Making cities work: The role of local authorities in the urban environment. London, England: Earthscan.
48.
Gillett-SwanJ.SargeantJ. (2015). Empowering the disempowered through voice-inclusive practice: Children’s views on adult-centric educational provision. European Educational Research Journal, 14, 177–191. doi:10.1177/1474904115571800
49.
GrahnP.MartenssonF.LindbladB.NilssonP.EkmanA. (1997). UTE pa DAGIS, Stad & Land nr. 93/1991. Alnarp, Sweden: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.
50.
Hansen-KetchumP. A.MarckP.ReutterL.HalpennyE. (2011). Strengthening access to restorative places: Findings from a participatory study on engaging with nature in the promotion of health. Health Place, 17, 558–571. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.014
51.
HartR. A. (1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London, England: Earthscan.
52.
Hidalgo-RuzV.ThielM. (2013). Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE pacific (Chile): A study supported by a citizen science project. Marine Environmental Research, 87-88, 12–18.
53.
HillmanC. H.EricksonK. I.KramerA. F. (2008). Be smart, exercise your heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature Review Neuroscience, 9, 58–65.
54.
HincksonE.SchneiderM.WinterS. J.StoneE.PuhanM.StathiA.…KingA. C. (2013). Citizen science applied to building healthier community environments: Advancing the field through shared construct and measurement development. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14, 1–13. doi:10.1186/s12966-017-05886
55.
HobanA. E.StillingR. M.MoloneyG.MoloneyR.ShanahanF.DinanT. G.…ClarkeG. (2017). Microbial regulation of microRNA expression in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Microbiome, 5, 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0321-3
IntemannK. (2009). Why diversity matters: Understanding and applying the diversity component of the National Science Foundation’s broader impacts criterion. Social Epistemology, 23, 249–266. doi:10.1080/02691720903364134
58.
JenkinsL. L. (2011). Using citizen science beyond teaching science content: A strategy for making science relevant to students’ lives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 501–508.
JonesD.GreenbergM.CrowleyM. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2283–2290.
61.
JonesM.RiddellK.MorrowA. (2013, November). The impact of citizen science activities on participant behaviour and attitude: Project report 2013 (pp. 2–49). Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA).
62.
KellertS. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development. In KahnP. H.KellertS. R. (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
KernA. LRoehrigG. H.BhattacharyaD.WangJ. Y.FinleyF. A.ReynoldsB. J.NamY. (2015). Drawing on place and culture for climate change education in native communities. In MuellerM.TippinsD. (Eds.), Ecojustice, citizen science and youth activism. Environmental discourses in science education (Vol. 1, pp. 131–138). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
65.
KernsT. (2013). Ten practical advantages of a human rights approach to environmental advocacy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3, 416–420. doi:10.1007/s13412-013-0143-y
66.
KimuraA. H.KinchyA. (2016). Citizen science: Probing the virtues and contexts of participatory research. Engaging Science Technology, and Society, 2, 331–361.
67.
KingA. C.WinterS. J.SheatsJ. L.RosasL. G.BumanM. P.SalvoD.…DommarcoJ. R. (2016). Leveraging citizen science and information technology for population physical activity promotion. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 1, 30–44.
68.
KuoF. E.Faber TaylorA. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1580–1586.
69.
Lakeman-FraserP.GoslingL.MoffatA. J.WestS. E.FraderaR.DaviesL.van der WalR. (2016). To have your citizen science cake and eat it? Delivering research and outreach through open air laboratories (OPAL). BMC Ecology, 16, 16. doi:10.1186/s12898-016-0065-0
LiebenbergL.SteventonJ.BrahmanN.BenadieK.MinyeJ.LangwaneH.QuasheX. (2017). Smartphone icon user interface design for non-literate trackers and its implications for an inclusive citizen science. Biological Conservation, 208, 155–168. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.033
74.
LiebermanG. A.HoodyL. L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. Poway, CA: SEER.
75.
LittledykeM. (2004). Primary children’s views on science and environmental issues: examples of environmental cognitive and moral development. Environmental Education Research, 10, 217–235.
76.
LouvR. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
MakuchK. E.AczelM. (2018). Citizen science and children. In HeckerS.HaklayM.BowserA.MakuchZ.VogelJ.BonnA. (Eds.), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy (pp. 391–409). London, England: UCL Press.
79.
MallerC.TownsendM.PryorA.BrownP.St LegerL. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people: ‘Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21, 45–54.
80.
MaloneK. (2006). United Nations: Key player in a global movement for child-friendly cities. In GleesonB.SnipeN. (Eds.), Creating child-friendly cities: Reinstating kids in the city (pp. 13–32). London, England: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
81.
MaryN. L. (2008). Social work in a sustainable world (pp. 82–86). Chicago, IL: Lyceum.
82.
MasonJ.HoodS. (2011). Exploring issues of children as actors in social research. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 490–495.
McCurdyL.WinterbottomK.MehtaS.RobertsJ. (2010). Using nature and outdoor activity to improve children’s health. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 40, 102–117.
85.
McKinleyD. C.Miller-RushingA. J.BallardH. L.BonneyR.BrownH.EvansD. M.…SoukupM. A. (2015). Investing in citizen science can improve natural resource management and environmental protection. Issues in Ecology, 19. Retrieved fromhttps://www.esa.org/esa/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Issue19.pdf
86.
MiczajkaV. L.KleinA.-M.PufalG. (2015). Elementary school children contribute to environmental research as citizen scientists. PLoS One, 10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143229
87.
MillerJ. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience TRENDS. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 430–434.
88.
MitchellN.TriskaM.LiberatoreA.AshcroftL.WeatherillR.LongneckerN. (2017). Benefits and challenges of incorporating citizen science into university education. PLoS One, 1. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186285
89.
Mor BarakM. E. (2000). Beyond affirmative action: Toward a model of diversity and organizational inclusion. Administration in Social Work, 23, 47–68.
90.
Mor BarakM. E. (2017). Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91.
Mor BarakM. E. (2018). The practice and science of social good: Emerging paths to positive social impact. Research on Social Work Practice, 762. doi:10.1177/1049731517745600
92.
MoranL.RauH. (2016). Mapping divergent concepts of sustainability: Lay knowledge, local practices and environmental governance. Local Environment, 21, 344–360.
93.
OkadaH.KuhnC.FeilletH.BachJ. F. (2010). The ‘hygiene hypothesis’ for autoimmune and allergic diseases: An update. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 160, 1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04139.x
94.
OlszakT.AnD.ZeissigS.VeraM. P.RichterJ.FrankeA.…BlumbergR. S. (2012). Microbial exposure during early life has persistent effects on natural killer T cell function. Science, 336, 489–493.
95.
PalmerJ. (2009). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. London, England: Routledge.
PolidoroB.ClementC. (2018). Beyond citizen science: Multigenerational education and mentoring in environmental monitoring—A case study. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 14, 521–522. doi:10.1002/ieam.4043
99.
PrettyJ.PeacockJ.HineR.SellensM.SouthN.GriffinM. (2006). Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 211–231.
100.
PrettyJ.PeacockJ.SellensM.GriffinM. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15, 319–337. doi:10.1080/09603120500155963
101.
PurcellK.GaribayC.DickinsonJ. L. (2012). A gateway to science for all: Celebrate urban birds. In DickinsonJ. L.LouvR.BonneyR. (Eds.), Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research (pp. 191–200). Ithaca, NY: Comstock Pub. Associates.
102.
RaychaudhuriM.SanyalD. (2012). Childhood obesity: Determinants, evaluation, and prevention. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 16, S192–S194. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.104037
103.
ResnikD. (2019). Citizen scientists as human subjects: Ethical issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4. doi:10.5334/cstp.150
104.
RidderD.Pahl-WostlC. (2005). Participatory integrated assessment in local level planning. Regional Environmental Change, 5, 188–196. doi:10.1007/s10113-004-0089-4
105.
RieschH.PotterC. (2014). Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 107–120.
SargeantJ. (2017). Towards voice-inclusive practice: Finding the sustainability of participation in realising the child’s rights in education. Children and Society, 32, 314–324. doi:10.1111/chso.12247
108.
SchutteA.TorquatiJ.BeattieH. (2015). Impact of urban nature on executive functioning in early and middle childhood. Environment and Behavior, 49, 3–30.
109.
SebbaR. (1991). The landscapes of childhood: The reflection of childhood’s environment in adult memories and in children’s attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 23, 395–422.
SoleriD.LongJ. W.Ramirez-AndreottaM. D.EitemillerR.PandyaR. (2016). Finding pathways to more equitable and meaningful public-scientist partnerships. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1, 9. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.46
115.
SorannoP.CheruvelilK.ElliottK.MontgomeryG. (2015). It’s good to share: Why environmental scientists’ ethics are out of date. BioScience, 65, 69–73. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu169
116.
StedmanR. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 671–685. doi:10.1080/08941920309189
117.
SternP. C.DietzT. (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
118.
StevensF. G.PlautV. C.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 116–133. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308314460
StrifeS.DowneyL. (2009). Childhood development and access to nature: A new direction for environmental inequality research. Organization and Environment, 22, 99–122. doi:10.1177/1086026609333340
121.
SunshineJ.TylerT. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–548. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1555077
122.
TengbergA.FredholmS.EliassonI.KnezI.SaltzmanK.WetterbergO. (2012). Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2, 14–26. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006
123.
TorquatiJ. (2010). Environmental education: A natural way to nurture children’s development and learning. YC Young Children, 65, 98–104.
124.
UK Youth Climate Coalition. (n.d.). UK Youth climate coalition. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ukycc.com
125.
United Nations. (1972). Principle 19, Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm. Retrieved fromhttp://www.un-documents.net/unchedec.htm
126.
UriarteM.EwingH.EvinerV.WeathersK. (2007). Constructing a broader and more inclusive value system in science. BioScience, 57, 71–78. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1641/B570111
127.
von BenzonN.MakuchK. EMakuchZ. (2008). The right for disabled children to access the natural environment: A law and policy critique. Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 16, 76–105.
128.
WaiteS.PassyR.GilchristM.HuntA.BlackwellI. (2016). Natural connections demonstration project, 2012–2016: Final report. Natural England Commissioned Reports (Number 215). Plymouth, England: Natural England.
129.
WeissS. M. (2002). Eat dirt—The hygiene hypothesis and allergic diseases. New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 930–931.
130.
WellsN. M.LekiesK. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16, 1–24.
131.
WellsN. M.MyersB. M.ToddL. E.BaraleK.GaolachB.FerenzG.FalkE. (2015). The effects of school gardens on children’s science knowledge: A randomized controlled trial of low-income elementary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 2858–2878.
132.
WhitakerR. C.WrightJ. A.PepeM. S.SeidelK. D.DietzW. H. (1997). Predicting obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. New England Journal Medicine, 337, 869–873. doi:10.1056/NEJM199709253371301
133.
WuT.PetrielloM. A. (2011). Culture and biodiversity losses linked. Letters to Science, 331, 30.
134.
Youth Environment Council South Australia. (n.d.). Youth Environment Council of South Australia. Retrieved fromhttp://www.yecsa.net.au/home.html
135.
ZoellickB.NelsonS. JSchaufflerM. (2012). Participatory science and education: Bringing both views into focus. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 310–313.
