The main purpose is to empirically investigate the outcomes of a Western-style Master of Social Work program that was designed by School of Social Work, University of Southern California and contextually implemented in School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University.
Method:
A three-wave panel study was used and a focus group discussion was conducted to evaluate the program.
Results:
Students reported a significant improvement in professional competence and satisfaction and a moderate decline in professional commitment after classroom training. However, after field training, there was almost no significant difference in professional competence and satisfaction, but there was a decline in professional commitment.
Conclusions:
The results come down to gaps between organizational development and students’ personal development, between education and practice, and between students’ expectation and reality. This study highlights the importance to fill in the gaps and sheds light on the way to indigenize social work education in China.
Bar-OnA. (1999). Social work and the missionary zeal to whip the heathen along the path of righteousness. British Journal of Social Work, 29, 5–26.
2.
BogoM. (2010). Achieving competence in social work through field education. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
3.
CaiY.BoA.HsiaoS. C. (2018). Emerging social work field education trends in China. Journal of Social Work Education, 54, 324–336.
4.
CampfenH. (1988). Forces shaping the new social work in Latin America. Canadian Social Work Review, 5, 9–27.
5.
Commission on Curricular Education and Innovation (COCEI). (2007). Rationale and guiding principles used to draft EPAS. Alexandria, VI: Council on Social Work Education.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
8.
DeCoutisT. A.SummersT. P. (1987). A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 40, 445–470.
9.
GiffordsE. D. (2003). An examination of organizational and professional commitment among public, not-for-profit, and proprietary social service employees. Administration in Social Work, 27, 5–23.
10.
GrayM. (2005). Dilemmas of international social work: Paradoxical processes in indigenisation, universalism and imperialism. International Journal of Social Welfare, 14, 231–238.
11.
GrayM.CoatesJ.BirdM. Y. (2008). Introduction. In GrayM.CoatesJ.BirdM. Y. (Eds.), Indigenous social work around the world: Towards culturally relevant education and practice (pp. 1–12). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
12.
GrayM.FookJ. (2004). The quest for a universal social work: Some issues and implications. Social Work Education, 23, 625–644.
13.
FortuneA.CavazosA.LeeM. (2005). Achievement motivation and outcome in social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 115–129.
14.
HochwarterW. A.PerreweP. L.FerrisG. R.BrymerR. A. (1999). Job satisfaction and performance: The moderating effects of value attainment and affective disposition. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 296–313.
15.
HomonoffE. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27, 135–169.
16.
IfeJ. (2000). Local and global practice: Relocating social work as a human rights profession in the new global order. European Journal of Social Work, 4, 5–15.
17.
LawA. K.GuJ. X. (2008). Social work education in mainland China: Development and issues. Asian Social Work & Policy Review, 2, 1–12.
18.
LeungJ. C. B. (2007). An international definition of social work for China. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 391–397.
19.
LiY.HanW.HuangC. (2012). Development of social work education in China: Background, current status, and prospects. Journal of Social Work Education, 48, 635–653.
20.
LiebermanA. A.HornbyH.RussellM. (1988). Analyzing the educational backgrounds and work experiences of child welfare personnel: A national study. Social Work, 33, 485–489.
21.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
LiuW. (2017). Investigation and reflection on professional identity of Masters of Social Work—Taking S school as an example. Beijing Education: Higher Education Edition, 9, 96–99.
23.
LiuM. R.SunF.AndersonS. G. (2013). Challenges in social work field education in China: Lessons from the Western experience. Social Work Education, 32, 179–196.
24.
LodahlT. M.KejnerM. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.
25.
McNeese SmithD. K.CrookM. (2003). Nursing values and a changing nurse workforce: Values, age, and job stages. Journal of Nursing Administration, 33, 260–270.
26.
Mor BarakM. E.NisslyJ. A.LevinA. (2001). Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 75, 625–662.
27.
MupedziswaR. (1997). Training social workers in an environment of economic reforms: The “mother” of all challenges?Social Work—Stellenbosch, 33, 233–243.
28.
ParkerJ. (2007). Developing effective practice learning for tomorrow’s social workers. Social Work Education, 26, 763–779.
29.
RaskinM. S.WayneJ.BogoM. (2008). Revisiting field education standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 73–188.
30.
RedmondB.GuerinS.DevittC. (2008). Attitudes, perceptions and concerns of student social workers: First two years of a longitudinal study. Social Work Education, 27, 868–882.
31.
ShiB. (2004). The new century: Choices that Chinese social work education faces. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition), 20, 30–35.
32.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 1–41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
TsangA. K. T.YanM. C. (2001). Chinese corpus, Western application: The Chinese strategy of engagement with Western social work discourse. International Social Work, 44, 433–454.
34.
WangS. (1997). The position of social work in China 's transitional period. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 34, 59–65. (In Chinese).
35.
WangS. (2004). China social work education development under non-coordinated reforming background. Journal of University of Science and Technology of Beijing—Social Sciences Version, 20, 24–29.
36.
WangY.ChuiE. (2017). Development and validation of the perceived social work competence scale in China. Research on Social Work Practice, 27, 91–102.
37.
WayneJ.BogoM.RaskinM. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 327–339.
38.
WarnerR. M. (2013). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
39.
WeickK. E.McDanielR. R. (1989). How professional organizations work: Implications for school organization and management. In SergiovanniT. J.MooreJ. H. (Eds.), Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reforms to issues that count (pp. 331–354). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
40.
WilsonG.KellyB. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of social work education: Preparing students for practice learning. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2431–2449.
41.
XiongY.WangS. B. (2007). Development of social work education in China in the context of new policy initiatives: Issues and challenges. Social Work Education, 53, 560–572.
42.
XueY. J. (1996). The development of social work education in the 1990s. In Development, exploration and indigenization: Proceedings of the Conference on the Development of Social Work Education in Chinese Communities (pp. 45–48). Beijing, China: Chinese Peace Press. (In Chinese)
43.
YanM.TsangA. K. T. (2005). A snapshot on the development of social work education in China: A Delphi study. Social Work Education, 24, 883–901.
44.
YipK. (2007). Tensions and dilemmas of social work education in china. International Social Work, 50, 93–105.
45.
Yuen-TsangA. W. K. (1996). Social work education in China: Constraints, opportunities, and challenges. In LoT. W.ChengJ. S. C. (Eds.) Social welfare development in China, constraints and challenges (pp. 85–100). Chicago, IL: Imprint.
46.
Yuen-TsangA. W. K.WangS. B. (2002). Tensions confronting the development of social work education in China: Challenges and opportunities. International Social Work, 45, 375–388.
47.
YunongH.XiongZ. (2008). A Reflection on the indigenization discourse in social work. International Social Work, 51, 611–622.
48.
ZeiraA.SchiffM. (2014). Field education: A comparison of students’ and novice social workers’ perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1950–1966.
