To construct a needs assessment instrument for older people using a standardized terminology (International classification of functioning, disability, and health [ICF]) and assess its psychometrical properties.
Method:
An instrument was developed comprising questions to older people regarding their perceived care needs. The instrument’s reliability, validity, and utility were tested. Forty-one social workers and 251 older people participated.
Results:
The questions were sufficiently unambiguous (inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation = .60–.80); measured a person’s care and service needs to a satisfactory extent (criteria validity, agreement between social workers’ and older people’s assessments = 72–94%); both social workers and older people considered the questions useful; and the needs of older people were documented in social records to a greater extent when the instrument was used.
Conclusion:
The psychometric properties of the instrument support its use by social workers to gain relevant information on elder care needs.
CherneskyR.GutheilI. (2008). Rethinking needs assessment in planning for services for older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 51, 109–125.
2.
DonnerA.EliasziwM. (1987). Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 441–448.
3.
DunérA.NordströmM. (2006). The discretion and power of streetlevel bureaucrats: An example from Swedish municipal elder care. European Journal of Social Work, 9, 425–444.
4.
FleissJ. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
FolsteinM.FolsteinS.McHughP. (1975). “Minimal-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
6.
GardnerM.AltmanD. (1989). Statistics with confidence-confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. Belfast, Ireland: British Medical Journal.
7.
HawesC.MorrisJ.PhillipsC.FriesB.MurphyK.MorV. (1997). Development of the nursing home Resident Assessment Instrument in the USA. Age & Ageing, 26, 19–25.
8.
HedströmM.LidströmB.Hulter ÅsbergK. (2009). Phase-20: Ett nytt instrument för skattning av möjliga läkemedelsrelaterade symtom hos äldre i äldreboende. [Phase-20: a new instrument for assessment of drug related symptoms among elderly in nursing homes]. Vård i Norden, 29, 9–14.
9.
HilleråsP.JormA.HerlizA.WinbladB. (2001). Life satisfaction among the very old: A survey on a cognitively intact sample aged 90 years or above. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 71–90.
10.
JanlövA. (2006). Participation in needs assessment of older people prior to public home help. (PhD Thesis), Lunds universitet.
11.
JylhäM. (2002). Self-rated health revisited: Exploring survey interview episodes with elderly respondents. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 983–990.
12.
KarlssonS. (2008). Older people's public health care and social services. Functional ability, health complaints, agreement in needs assessment and care satisfaction. (PhD Thesis), Lunds universitet.
13.
KatzS.FordA.MoskowitzR.JacksonB.JaffeM. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914–919.
14.
KaufmanS. (1994). The social construction of frailty: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 45–58.
15.
LindelöfM.RönnbäckE. (2004). Att fördela bistånd. Om handläggningsprocessen inom äldreomsorgen[To distibute care. About the investigation process in elder care]. (PhD Thesis), Umeå universitet, Umeå.
16.
LissP. (1990). Health care need. Meaning and measurement. (PhD Thesis), Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, Sweden.
17.
OlaisonA. (2009). Negotiating needs. Processing older persons as home care recipients in gerontological social work practices. (PhD Thesis), Linköpings Universitet.
18.
OlaisonA. (2010). Creating images of old people as home care receivers. Categorizations of needs in social work. Qualitative Social Work, 9, 500–518.
19.
Socialstyrelsen. (2002). Instrument för utredning inom kommunens äldreomsorg - En översikt - Anhörig 300[Instrument in municipal elder care - a review]. Stockholm, Sweden: Socialstyrelsen.
20.
Socialstyrelsen. (2010). Internationell klassifikation av funktionstillstånd, funktionshinder och hälsa[International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health]. Stockholm, Sweden: Socialstyrelsen och WHO.
21.
Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. (2010). Kommungruppsindelning 2011. Revidering av Sveriges kommuner och landstings kommungruppsindelning[Division of municipalities 2011, revision by Swedish Association of local authorities and regions]. Stockholm, Sweden.
22.
ThorslundM.LarssonK. (2002). Äldres behov. En kunskapsöversikt och diskussion om framtiden[Older persons need. A review and future discussion]. Jönköping, Sweden: Stiftelsen Stockholms läns Äldrecentrum.
23.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
24.
YesavageJ.BrinkT. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37–49.
