There are two purposes to this article. The first is to update the science of social work framework. The second is to use recent discussions on the nature of realist science and on social work science to propose a definition of social work as an integrative scientific discipline that complements its definition as a profession.
AhearnL. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
2.
BarkerR. (1995). The social work dictionary (3rd ed.). Washington DC: NASW Press.
3.
BarwaisF. (2011). Definitions of wellbeing, quality of life and wellness. Brisbane, Queensland: National Wellness Institute of Australia, Inc.
4.
BircherJ. (2005). Towards a dynamic definition of health and disease. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 8, 335–341.
5.
Brekke, J. (2011). It’s not about fish and bicycles—We need a science of social work!Aaron Rosen Lecture, Society for Social Work and Research, Tampa, FL, January 14, 2011.
6.
BrekkeJ.S. (2012). Shaping a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 455–464.
7.
BrekkeJ. S.MarshJ. C. (2013). Special session: The science of social work. Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference, January 16–20, San Diego, CA.
8.
BungeM. (1985). Treatise on basic philosophy: Volume 7: Part II: Life science, social science and technology. New York, NY: Springer.
9.
BungeM. (1988). The nature of applied science and technology. In MahnerM. (Ed.), (2001). Scientific realism: Selected essays of Mario Bunge (pp. 345–351). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press.
10.
BungeM. (2009a). Philosophy of science: From problem to theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
11.
BungeM. (2009b). Philosophy of science: From explanation to justification. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
12.
CallahanD. (1973). The concept of health. The Hastings Center Studies, 1, 77–87.
13.
CorbinC. B.PangraziR. P. (2001). Toward a uniform definition of wellness: A commentary. Research Digest President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, 3, 1–8.
14.
CumminsR. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.
15.
Dall’AlbaG. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41, 34–45.
16.
DodgeR.DalyA.HuytonJ.SandersL. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 222–235.
17.
FergusonR.GeverM.Minh-haT. T.WestC. (1999). Out there: Marginalization and contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
FongR. (2012). Framing education for a science of social work: Missions, curriculum, and doctoral training. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 529–536.
19.
FraserM. W.RichmanJ. M.GalinskyM. J.DayS. H. (2009). Intervention research: Developing social programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
GibelmanM. (1999). The search for identity: Defining social work—past, present, future. Social Work, 44, 298–310.
21.
GreenM. F.LeeJ. (2012). Neural bases of emotional experience versus perception in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 71, 96–97.
22.
HillsJ.LeGrandJ.PiachaudD. (2002). Understanding social exclusion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
Hirsch HadornG.Hoffmann-RiemH.Biber-KlemmS.Grossenbacher-MansuyW.JoyeD.PohlC.…ZempE. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. New York, NY: Springer.
24.
HoV. M.LeeJ. A.MartinK. C. (2011). The cell biology of synaptic plasticity. Science, 334, 623–628.
25.
JayawickremeE.FrogeardM. J. C.SeligmanM. E. P. (2012). The engine of well-being. Review of General Psychology16, 327–342.
26.
KajikawaY. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science3, 215–239.
27.
KrishnanA. (2009). What are academic disciplines? (Working Paper Series). Southampton, England: University of Southampton National Centre for Research Methods.
28.
MurphyC. N. (2005). Global institutions, marginalization and development. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
National Association of Social Work. (2008). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
30.
NuriusP. S.KempS. P. (2012). Social work, science, social impact: Crafting an integrative conversation. Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 548–552.
31.
NussbaumM. C.SenA. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
32.
NussbaumM. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Research on Social Work Practice. (2010). Special Section on Intervention Science, 20(4).
34.
Research on Social Work Practice. (2009). Special Section on Implementation Science, 19(4).
35.
RosenfeldP. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science and Medicine, 35, 1343–1357.
36.
SaracciR. (1997). The World Health Organization needs to reconsider its definition of Health. British Medical Journal, 314, 1409–1410.
37.
SenA. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny(Social Development Papers No. 1). Office of Environment and Social Development: Asian Development Bank.
38.
SenA. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6, 151–166.
39.
SommerfeldP. (2014). Social Work as an “Action Science“—A perspective from Europe. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 586–600.
40.
TheofilouP. (2013). Quality of life: Definition and measurement. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 9, 150–162.
41.
World Health Organization. (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, June 19–22, 1946, and entered into force on April 7, 1948, p. 1.
