The emerging discourse on science in social work (SW) has generated much-needed analysis of the profession’s status as a scientific enterprise. Brekke raised critical issues that must be addressed for SW to become a science. This response examines the contextual factors that led to the call for SW science. It also relies on a comparative analysis of attempts by other professions and disciplines to become scientific to discuss critical challenges and opportunities for SW to evolve to science status in the highly contentious scientific environment of the 21st century.
AlmondG. A. (1966). Political theory and political science. American Political Science Review, 60, 869–879. doi:10.2307/1953762
3.
AndrulisD. P.SiddiquiN. J.PurtleJ. P.DuchonL. (2010). Patient protection and affordable care act of 2010: Advancing health equity for racially and ethnically diverse populations. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
4.
BrekkeJ. S. (1986). Scientific imperatives in social work research: Pluralism is not skepticism. Social Service Review, 60, 538–554.
5.
BrekkeJ. S. (2012). Shaping science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 455–464. doi:10.1177/1049731512441263
6.
BrekkeJ. S. (2014). A science of social work, and social work as an integrative scientific discipline: Have we gone too far, or not far enough?Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 517–523.
7.
BrekkeJ. S.EllK.PalinkasL. A. (2007). Translational science at the National Institute of Mental Health: Can social work take its rightful place?Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 123–133. doi:10.1177/1049731506293693
8.
Brunswick HeinemanM. (1981). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research. Social Service Review, 55, 371–397.
GulickL. (1965). Management is a science. Academy of Management Journal, 8, 7–13. doi:10.2307/255127
11.
Guski-LeinwandS. (2009). Becoming a science: The loss of the scientific approach of Völkerpsychologie. Journal of Psychology, 217, 79–84. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.2.79
12.
HudsonW. W. (1982). Scientific imperatives in social work research and practice. Social Service Review, 56, 246–258.
13.
KuhnT. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
MarshJ. C. (2012). Response: From fish and bicycles to a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 465–467.
15.
MaynardB. R.VaughnM. G.SarteschiC. M. (2012). The empirical status of social work dissertation research: Characteristics, trends, and implications for the field. British Journal of Social Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/bjsw/BCS123
16.
MaynardB. R.VaughnM. G.SarteschiC. M.BerglundA. H. (2012). Social work dissertation research: Contributing to scholarly discourse or the file drawer?British Journal of Social Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs172
17.
MunsonR. (1981). Why medicine cannot be a science. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 6, 183–208. doi:10.1093/jmp/6.2.183
RousseauD. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”?Academy of Management Review, 31, 256–269. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.20208679
24.
SommerfeldP. (2014). Social work as an “action science” (Handlungswissenschaft): A perspective from Europe. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 586–600.
Wilson-StronksA.LeeK. K.CorderoC. L.KoppA. L.GalvezE. (2008). One size does not fit all: Meeting the health care needs of diverse populations. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission.
