Objectives: The purpose of this study is to test whether increasing the exposure to coaching by adding an in-home component to clinic-delivered Parent—Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) will increase the speed of parenting skill acquisition and show greater improvements in children’s behaviors and parental stress. Methods: Seventy-three parent—child dyads participating in clinic-based PCIT are randomly assigned to an adjunct PCIT or Social Support treatment group. The sample of children is 58% male and ranges in age from 1.7 to 8.2 years. Results: Analyses show that participation in adjunct PCIT services is associated with greater use of positive verbalizations and leads to improvement on measures of parent functioning. Conclusions: The meaning of these findings with respect to change and the process of treatment is discussed.
Boggs, S., Eyberg, S., & Reynolds, L. ( 1990). Concurrent validity of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory . Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 75-78.
3.
Chaffin, M., Silovsky, J.F., Funderburk, B., Valle, L.A., Brestan, E.V., Balachova, T., et al. (2004). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with physically abusive parents: Efficacy for reducing future abuse report. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 500-510.
4.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
5.
Eyberg, S.M., Bessmer, J., Newcomb, K., Edwards, D., & Robinson, E. ( 1994). Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System-II: A manual (Social and behavioral sciences documents Ms. No. 2897). San Rafael, CA: Select Press.
6.
Eyberg, S., & Pincus, D. ( 1999). ECBI & SESBI-R: Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory- Revised, professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7.
Eyberg, S., & Robinson, E.A. (1982). Parent-Child Interaction Training: Effects on family functioning. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 130-137.
8.
Eyberg, S., & Robinson, E.A. (1983). Conduct problem behavior: Standardization of a behavioral rating scale with adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 347-354.
9.
Hood, K., & Eyberg, S. ( 2003). Outcomes of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Mothers’ reports of maintenance three to six years after treatment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 412-429.
10.
Leung, C., Tsang, S., Heung, K., & Yiu, I. (in press). Effectiveness of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy among Chinese families. Research on Social Work Practice.
11.
Matos, M., Torres, R., Santiago, R., Jurado, M., & Rodriguez, I. ( 2006). Adaptation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for Puerto Rican families: A preliminary study. Family Process, 45, 205-222.
12.
McCabe, K., Yeh, M., Garland, A., Lau, A., & Chavez, G. ( 2005). The GANA program: A tailoring approach to adapting Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for Mexican-Americans. Education & Treatment of Children, 28, 111-129.
13.
Robinson, E., Eyberg, S., & Ross, A. ( 1980). The standardization of an inventory of child problematic conduct behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 22-28.
14.
Timmer, S.G., Urquiza, A.J., Herschell, A., McGrath, J., Zebell, N., Porter, A., et al. (2004). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Application of an empirically supported treatment to maltreated children in foster care . Child Welfare, 85, 919-939.
15.
Timmer, S., Urquiza, A., McGrath, J., & Zebell, N. ( 2005). Parent- Child Interaction Therapy: Application to maltreating parent- child dyads. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 825-842.
16.
Timmer, S.G., Urquiza, A.J., & Zebell, N. ( 2006). Challenging foster caregiver-maltreated child relationships: The effectiveness of Parent Child Interaction Therapy. Child and Youth Services Review, 28, 1-19.
17.
Timmer, S., Ware, L., Urquiza, A., & Zebell, N. (in press). The effectiveness of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for victims of inter-parental violence. Violence & Victims.
