Objectives: Services to children and adolescents with a severe emotional disturbance (SED) have long been inadequate. The wraparound approach has emerged as a promising practice that could address the needs of children with SED and their families through a strength-based, individualized, family-focused team process that emphasizes flexible service planning. This study compares the outcomes of youth receiving the wraparound approach with youth receiving traditional child welfare case management. Method: Child behavior and community integration outcomes were measured at intake and at 6 months in services. Results: Results indicated that youth receiving the wraparound approach showed significant improvement on the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) when compared with youth receiving traditional child welfare services. Results also showed that youth receiving traditional child welfare services experienced significantly fewer placements. However, neither group showed significant differences on other clinical or functional outcomes. Conclusions: Results are discussed, as well as applications to social work practice, study limitations, and recommendations for additional research on wraparound.
Achenbach, T.M. ( 1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSMIV-TR. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Bickman, L., Smith, C.M., Lambert, E.W., & Andrade, A.R. ( 2003). Evaluation of a congressionally mandated wraparound demonstration . Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 135-156.
4.
Bruns, E.J., Burchard, J.D., Suter, J.C., & Force, M.D. ( 2005). Measuring fidelity within community treatments for children and families. In M. Epstein, A. Duchnowski, & K. Kutash (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families (Vol. 2, pp. 175-197). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
5.
Bruns, E.J., Burchard, J.D., & Yoe, J.T. ( 1995). Evaluating the Vermont system of care: Outcomes associated with community-based wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4, 321-339.
6.
Bruns, E.J., Walker, J.S., Miles, P., Osher, T.W., Rast, J., VanDenBerg, J.D., & National Wraparound Initiative Advisory Group (2004). Ten principles of the wraparound process . Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University.
7.
Burchard, J.D., Burchard, S.N., Sewell, R., & VanDenBerg, J. (1993). One kid at a time: Evaluative case studies and description of the Alaska Youth Initiative Demonstration Project. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Child Development Center.
8.
Burns, B.J., & Goldman, S.K. ( 1999). Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. Systems of care: Promising practices in children’s mental health, 1998 series (Vol. 4). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institute for Research.
9.
Clark, H.B., & Clarke, R.T. ( 1996). Research on the wraparound process and individualized services for children with multisystem needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 1-5.
10.
Clark, H.B., Lee, B., Prange, M.E., & McDonald, B.A. (1996). Children lost within the foster care system: Can wraparound service strategies improve placement outcomes . Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 39-53.
11.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Eber, L., Osuch, R., & Redditt, C. ( 1996). School-based applications of the wraparound process: Early results on service provision and student outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 83-99.
13.
Eber, L., Osuch, R., & Rolf, K. ( 1996). School-based wraparound: How implementation and evaluation can lead to system change. In C. J. Liberton , K. Kutash, & R. M. Friedman (Eds.), The 8th annual research conference proceedings, a system of care for children’s mental health: Expanding the research base (pp. 143-147). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.
14.
Evans, M.E., Armstrong, M.I., & Kuppinger, A.D. (1996). Family-centered intensive case management: A step toward understanding individualized care. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 55-65.
15.
Hawkins, R.P., Almeida, M.C., Fabry, B., & Reitz, A.L. ( 1992). A scale to measure restrictiveness of living environments for troubled children and youths. Hospital and Community Psychiatry , 43, 54-58.
16.
Hernandez, M., & Hodges, S. ( 2003). Building upon the theory of change for systems of care . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 19-24.
17.
Hodges, K. ( 1999). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (pp. 631-664). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers .
18.
Hyde, K.L., Burchard, J.D., & Woodworth, K. ( 1996). Wrapping services in an urban setting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 67-82.
19.
Illback, R.J., Nelson, C.M., & Sanders, D. ( 1998). Community-based services in Kentucky: Description and 5-year evaluation of Kentucky IMPACT. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & J. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 141-172). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
20.
Myaard, M.J. ( 2000). Applying behavior analysis within the wraparound process: A multiple baseline study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 216-231.
21.
National Institute of Mental Health. (2001 ). Blueprint for change: Research on child and adolescent mental health. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
Rast, J., VanDenBerg, J., & Dalder, G. ( 2004). Coaching and supervision tools for wraparound. Englewood, CO: Vroon VanDenBerg.
23.
Russell, L.A., Rotto, K.I., & Matthews, B. ( 1999). Preliminary findings from Indiana’s DAWN project . In J. Willis, C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), The 11th annual research conference proceedings, a system of care for children’s mental health: Expanding the research base (pp. 55-58). Tampa: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.
24.
Stroul, B.E., & Friedman, R.M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.
25.
Suter, J.C. ( 2007, June). A critical review of the evidence base for wraparound . Poster presented at the Building on Family Strengths: Research and Services in Support of Children and their Families Conference , Portland, OR.
26.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Retrieved June 27, 2007, from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/home.html Retrieved 12/11/08
27.
VanDenBerg, J.E. ( 1993). Integration of individualized mental health services into the system of care for children and adolescents. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 20, 247-257.
28.
Yoe, J.T., Santarcangelo, S., Atkins, M., & Burchard, J.D. (1996). Wraparound care in Vermont: Program development, implementation, and evaluation of a statewide system of individualized services. Journal of Child and Family Studies , 5, 23-37.
