Objective: This project tested the effectiveness of extended aftercare in an intensive family preservation program for African American families. Method: Service providers collected pretest and posttest data for 49 families who received intensive services only and 69 who received aftercare in addition to intensive services. Results: In the year following termination, nonrelative placements for the entire sample were reduced to 20.3% from 41.5% in the year prior to receiving services ( p < .01). Families receiving aftercare had a postservice placement rate of 13.0% (p < .05). Services were less effective with caregivers with criminal involvement or mental health issues. Discussion: Significant reductions in re-referrals for neglect (p < .01) and improvement in factors contributing to child well-being (p < .01) indicate that child safety was not compromised by providing in-home services as an alternative to placement.
Albert, V.N., & Barth, R.P. (1996). Predicting growth in child abuse and neglect reports in urban, suburban, and rural counties. Social Service Review , 70, 58-82.
2.
Berry, M. (1992). An evaluation of family preservation services: Fitting agency services to family needs. Social Work, 37, 314-321.
3.
Ciliberti, P., Nelson, K., Briggs, H., & Baker, V. (1996). Strengthening African-American families in a community-based context: An innovative program. In E. Walton , R. E. Davis, & P. Sandau-Beckler (Eds), Empowering families: Papers from the Ninth Annual Conference on Family-Based Services (pp. 131-148). Riverdale, IL: National Association for Family-Based Service.
4.
Close, M. (1983). Child welfare and people of color. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 19(4), 13-20.
5.
Coohey, C. (1996). Child maltreatment: Testing the social isolation hypothesis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 241-254.
6.
Courtney, M.E., Barth, R.P., Duerr Berrick, J., Brooks, D., Needell, B., & Park, L. (1996). Race and child welfare services: Past research and future directions. Child Welfare, 75, 99-137.
7.
Dunn, M.G., Mezzich, A., Janiszewski, S., Kirisci, L., & Tartar, R.E. (2001). Transmission of neglect in substance abuse families: The role of child dysregulation and parental SUD. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 10, 123-132.
8.
Dunst, C., Trivette, C., & Deal, A. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
9.
Everett, J.E., Chipungu, S.S., & Leashore, B.R. (1991). Child welfare: An Africentric perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
Fraser, M.W., Nelson, K.E., & Rivard, J.C. (1997). Effectiveness of family preservation services . Social Work Research, 21, 138-153.
11.
Gaudin, J.A., Polansky, N.A., Kilpatrick, A.C., & Shilton, P. (1993). Loneliness, depression, stress, and social supports in neglectful families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , 63, 597-605.
12.
Harrington, D., Dubowitz, H., Black, M.M., & Binder, A. (1995). Maternal substance use and neglectful parenting: Relations with children's development. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24, 258-263.
13.
Kinney, J.M., Haapala, D., & Booth, C. (1991). Keeping families together: The Homebuilders model . Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
14.
Leary, J. (1993). The philosophical foundations of the relationship model of educational intervention. Portland, OR: Self-Enhancement, Inc.
15.
Magura, S., & Moses, B.S. (1986). Outcome measures for child welfare services: Theory and applications. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
16.
Morton, T.D. (1999). The increasing colorization of America's child welfare system: The over-representation of African-American children. Policy and Practice, 57(4), 23-30.
17.
Nelson, K.E. (2003). Indicators and outcomes of chronic neglect in a family preservation program for African-American families. Portland, OR: Child Welfare Partnership, School of Social Work, Portland State University.
18.
Nelson, K.E., & Hunter, R.W. (1994). Empowering families through home-based services . In L. Gutierrez & P. Nurius (Eds.), Education and research for empowerment practice (pp. 249-259). Seattle: Center for Policy and Practice Research, School of Social Work, University of Washington.
19.
Nelson, K.E., & Landsman, M.J. (1992). Alternative models of family preservation: Family-based services in context. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
20.
Nelson, K.E., Landsman, M.J., Cross. T., & Tyler, M. (1994). Family functioning in neglectful families: Final report. Iowa City, IA: National Resource Center on Family Based Services.
21.
Nelson, K.E., Saunders, E.J., & Landsman, M.J. (1993). Chronic child neglect in perspective. Social Work, 38, 661-671.
22.
Sedlak, A.J., & Broadhurst, D.D. (1996). Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: Final report (NIS-3). Washington, DC: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
23.
Stehno, S.M. (1982). Differential treatment of minority children in services systems. Social Work, 27, 39-46.
24.
Webb, M.B., Courtney, M., Harden, B.J., & Jones, B. (2003, April). Children of Color Project. Presented at the 14th National Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect , St. Louis, MO.
25.
Yuan, Y.T., & Struckman-Johnson, D.L. (1991). Placement outcomes for neglected children with prior placements in family preservation programs . In K. Wells & D. E. Biegel (Eds.), Family preservation services: Research and evaluation (pp. 92-120). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
