Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the nature of individual attitudes toward sex offenders. Because the term “sex offender” tends to evoke strong emotions, and given that open-ended self reports tend to be highly subjective, particularly in the context of such pointed terminology, this study sought to develop an attitude assessment tool that addresses specific domains found in the literature. Methods: Through a number of iterations, the Community Attitudes Toward Sex Offenders Scale was developed. Results: Exploratory and subsequent confirmatory factor analyses found a four-factor, 18-item version to best represent the domains of interest. Factor and item characteristics are reported. Conclusions: Replication and extension to other populations appears warranted.
ABC News. (2007). Outrage after teen gets 10 years for oral sex with girl. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from ABC News website: http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/LegalCenter/story?id=1693362&page=1
2.
Becker, J.V., & Murphy, W.D. (1998). What we know and do not know about assessing and treating sex offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 4, 116-137.
3.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin , 88, 588-606.
4.
Brown, S. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders . Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 239-252.
5.
Byrne, B.M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analysis models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
Church, W.T., Baldwin, J., Brannen, D.N., & Clements, C.B. (2007). An exploratory study of social work student's attitudes toward mentally ill offenders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
Clements, C.B., Brannen, D.N., Kirkley, S.M., Gordon, T., & Church, W.T. (2006). The measurement of concern about victims: Empathy, victim advocacy, and the Victim Concern Scale (VCS). Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 283-295.
8.
Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 10, 1-9.
9.
Fedoroff, J.P., & Moran, B. (1997). Myths and misconceptions about sex offenders. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 263-276.
10.
Ferguson, K., & Ireland, C.A. (2006). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the influence of offence type: A comparison of staff working in a forensic setting and students . The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 8, 10-19.
11.
Griffin, M.P., & West, D.A. (2006). The lowest of the low? Addressing the disparity between community view, public policy, and treatment effectiveness for sex offenders. Law & Psychology Review, 30, 143-169.
Harnett, P.H. (1997). The attitudes of female and male residential care-workers to the perpetrators of sexual and physical assault. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 861-868.
14.
Hogue, T.E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders . Issues in Criminal & Legal Psychology, 19, 23-32.
15.
Lea, S., Auburn, T., & Kibblewhite, K. (1999). Working with sex offenders: The perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 43, 103-119.
16.
Melvin, K.B., Gramling, L.K., & Gardner, W.M. (1985). A scale to measure attitudes toward prisoners . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 241-253.
17.
Nelson, M., Herlihy, B., & Oescher, J. (2002). A survey of counselor attitudes towards sex offenders . Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 24, 51-67.
18.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Paulhus, D.L. (1988). Assessing self deception and impression management in self-reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Manual available from the author at the Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 1Y7.
20.
Paulhus, D.L. (1998). The Paulhus Deception Scales: BIDR Version 7. Toronto/Buffalo: Multi-Health Systems.
21.
Preacher, K.J., & MacCallum, R.C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics , 2, 13-43.
22.
Quinn, J.F., Forsyth, C.J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25, 215-232.
23.
Sedensky, M. (2007, June 28). Miami sex offenders living under a bridge . Retrieved June 25, 2007, from USA Today website: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-06-miami-sex-offenders_N.htm
24.
Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
26.
Valliant, P.M., Furac, C.J., & Antonowicz, D.H. (1994). Attitudes toward sex offenders by female undergraduate university students enrolled in a psychology program . Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 105-110.
27.
Weekes, J.R., Pelletier, G., & Beaudette, D. (1995). Correctional officers: How do they perceive sex offenders?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 55-61.
28.
Wnuk, D., Chapman, J.E., & Jeglic, E.L. (2006). Development and refinement of a measure of attitudes toward sex offender treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation , 43, 35-47.
