Objective: Developing the scientific underpinnings of social welfare requires effective and efficient methods of retrieving relevant items from the increasing volume of research. Method: We compared seven databases by running the nearest equivalent search on each. The search topic was chosen for relevance to social work practice with older people. Results: Highest sensitivity was achieved by Medline (52%), Social Sciences Citation Index (46%) and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (30%). Highest precision was achieved by AgeInfo (76%), PsycInfo (51%) and Social Services Abstracts (41%). Each database retrieved unique relevant articles. Conclusions: Comprehensive searching requires the development of information management skills. The social work profession would benefit from having a dedicated international database with the capability and facilities of major databases such as Medline, CINAHL, and PsycInfo.
Adams, C.E., Power, A., Frederick, K., & Lefebvre, C. (1994). An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care . Psychological Medicine, 24, 741-748.
2.
Avenell, A., Handoll, H.H.G., & Grant, A.M. (2001). Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 7, 505-510.
3.
Booth, A., O'Rourke, A., & Ford, N. (2000). Structuring the pre-search reference interview: A useful technique for handling clinical questions. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88, 239-246.
4.
Brettle, A.J. (2001). Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89, 353-362.
5.
Chalmers, I. (1994). Foreword. In I. Chalmers & D. G. Altman (Eds.), Systematic Reviews. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
6.
Clarke, M., & Chalmers, I. (1998). Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: Islands in search of continents?Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 280-282.
7.
Cook, D.J., Mulrow, C.D., & Haynes, R.B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126, 376-380.
8.
Counsell, C. (1997). Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine , 127, 380-387.
9.
Dempster, M. (2003). Systematic reviews. In R. Miller & J. Brewer (Eds.), The A to Z of Social Research. London: Sage.
10.
Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., & Lefebvre, C. (1994). Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews . British Medical Journal, 309, 1286-1291.
11.
Egger, M., Juni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F., & Sterne, J. (2003). How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study . Health Technology Assessment, 7(1), 1-76.
12.
Fisher, M., Qureshi, H., Hardyman, W., & Homewood, J. (2006). How knowledge works in social care report 9: Using qualitative research in systematic reviews: Older people's views of hospital discharge. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
13.
Gambrill, E. (2006). Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead . Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 338-357.
14.
Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research . Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
15.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. (1981). Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005, November 5). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources . British Medical Journal, 331(7524), 1064-1065.
17.
Hay, P.J., Adams, C.E., & Lefebvre, C. (1996). The efficiency of searches for randomized controlled trials in the International Journal of Eating Disorders: A comparison of handsearching, EMBASE and PsychLIT. Health Libraries Review, 13, 91-96.
18.
Haynes, B.R., McKibbon, A.K., Wilczynski, N.L., Walter, S.D., & Were, S.R. (2005). Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: Analytical survey. British Medical Journal, 330, 1179.
19.
Higgins, K., & Pinkerton, J. (1998). Literature reviewing: Towards a more rigorous approach. In D. Iwaniek & J. Pinkerton (Eds.), Making research work: Promoting child care policy and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20.
Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Lusher, A., Lefebvre, C. & Westby, M. (2002). A comparison of handsearching versus Medline searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials. Statistical Medicine, 21, 1625-1634.
21.
Hunt, M. (1997). The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
Light, R.J., & Smith, P.V. (1971). Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 429-471.
23.
Macdonald, G. (2001). Effective interventions for child abuse and neglect: An evidence-based approach to planning and evaluating interventions. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
24.
Matthews, E.J., Edwards, A.G.K., Barker, J., Bloor, M., Covey, J., Hood, K., et al. (1999). Efficient literature searching in diffuse topics: Lessons from a systematic review of research on communicating risk to patients in primary care. Health Libraries Review, 16, 112-1120.
25.
Meade, M.O., & Richardson, W.S. (1997). Selecting and appraising studies for a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine , 127, 531-537.
26.
Petrosino, A., Boruch, R.F., Rounding, C., McDonald, S. & Chalmers, I. (2000). The Campbell Collaboration: Social, Psychological, Educational, and Criminological Trials Registry (C2-SPECTR) to facilitate the preparation and maintenance of systematic reviews of social and educational interventions. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3&4), 206-219.
27.
Pollio, D.E. (2006). The art of evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(2), 224-232.
28.
Popay, J., & Roen, K. (2003). Using evidence from diverse research designs: SCIE Report 3, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
29.
Reid, W.J. (1997). Long-term trends in clinical social work. Social Service Review, 71, 200-213.
30.
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques . Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365-371.
31.
Schuerman, J., Soydan, H., Macdonald, G., Forslund, M., deMoya, D., Boruch, R. (2002). The Campbell Collaboration. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 309-317.
32.
Smith, M.L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education, 4, 22-24.
33.
Snowball, R. (1997). Using the clinical question to teach search strategy: Fostering transferable conceptual skills in user education by active learning . Health Library Review, 14(3), 167-172.
34.
Stevenson, O. (1971). Knowledge for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 1, 225-237.
35.
Stevinson, C., & Lawlor, D.A. (2004). Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: Added values or diminishing returns? Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 12, 228-232.
36.
Taylor, B.J. (2003). Literature searching. In R. Miller & J. Brewer (Eds.), The A to Z of social research. London: Sage.
37.
Taylor, B.J., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2003). Hidden gems: Systematically searching electronic databases for research publications for social work and social care. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 423-439.
38.
Taylor, B.J., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2007). Grading gems: Appraising the quality of research for social work and social care. British Journal of Social Work, 37(2), 335-354.
39.
Taylor, B.J., Wylie, E., Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2006). An Evaluation of the AgeInfo Database. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence. Available online at http://www.scie.org.uk/
40.
White, V.J., Glanville, J.M., Lefebvre, C., & Sheldon, T.A. (2001). A statistical approach to designing search filters to find systematic reviews: Objectivity enhances accuracy. Journal of Information Science, 27, 357-370.
