Objective: The Evaluation Self-Efficacy Scale (ESE) is being developed as an outcomes assessment instrument for social work courses focusing on evaluation. Method: This scale, based on social cognitive theory, was pretested, revised, and then used with a final sample of 85 master's-level students in the original study. Using a single-group, pretest-posttest retrospective design, the current study (N = 111) is a direct replication of the original ESE study. Results: In this replication, Cronbach's alphas for the ESE were .95 (pretest), .95 (posttest), and .96 (retrospective pretest). Evidence for the construct validity of the ESE is obtained. Conclusion: The results provide additional evidence supporting the psychometric properties of data obtained using the ESE, suggesting that it may be appropriate for use in educational outcomes assessment in general and accreditation-related research in particular.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
2.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
3.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
Bandura, A. (2004). Swimming against the mainstream: The early years from chilly tributary to transformative mainstream. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 613-630.
6.
Bandura, A. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion . Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 245-254.
7.
Bornstein, R.F. (1990). Publication politics, experimenter bias and the replication process in social science research. In J. W. Neulip (Ed.), Handbook of replication research in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 71-82). CorteMadera, CA: Select Press.
8.
Buchan, V., Rodenheiser, R., Hull, G., Smith, M., Rogers, J., Pike, C., et al. (2004). Evaluating an assessment tool for undergraduate social work education: Analysis of the Baccalaureate Educational Assessment Package. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(2), 239-253.
9.
Cliff, N. (1987). Analyzing multivariate data. New York: Harcourt Brace.
10.
Coates, H. (2007). Excellent measures precede measures of excellence . Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 87-94.
11.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Council on Social Work Education. (2002). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://www.cswe.org
13.
Cournoyer, B.R., & Adamek, M.E. (2001). The 2001 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards: The value of research revisited. Advances in Social Work, 2, 119-126.
14.
Cronbach, L. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers' College Record, 64, 672-683.
15.
Cuzzi, L.C., Holden, G., Chernack, P., Rutter, S., & Rosenberg, G. (1997). Evaluating social work field instruction: Rotations versus year-long placements. Research on Social Work Practice , 7, 402-414.
16.
Cuzzi, L.C., Holden, G., Rutter, S., Rosenberg, G., & Chernack, P. (1996). A pilot study of fieldwork rotations vs. year long placements for social work students in a public hospital. Social Work in Health Care, 24, 73-91.
17.
Frans, D.J. (1993). A scale for measuring social worker empowerment . Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 312-328.
18.
Holden, G., Anastas, J., & Meenaghan, T. (2003). Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 425-440.
19.
Holden, G., Anastas, J., & Meenaghan, T. (2005). EPAS objectives and foundation practice self-efficacy: A replication. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 559-570.
20.
Holden, G., Barker, K., Meenaghan, T., & Rosenberg, G. (1999). Research self-efficacy: A new possibility for educational outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education , 35, 463-476.
21.
Holden, G., Barker, K., Rosenberg, G., & Onghena, P. (2007). Assessing progress towards accreditation related objectives: Evidence regarding the use of self-efficacy as an outcome in the advanced concentration research curriculum. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 456-465.
22.
Holden, G., Cuzzi, L.C., Rutter, S., Chernack, P., & Rosenberg, G. (1997). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: A replication. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 490-499.
23.
Holden, G., Cuzzi, L.C., Rutter, S., Chernack, P., Spitzer, W., & Rosenberg, G. (1997). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: A partial replication and extension. Health &Social Work , 22, 256-263.
24.
Holden, G., Cuzzi, L.C., Rutter, S., Rosenberg, G., & Chernack, P. (1996). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: Initial development. Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 353-365.
25.
Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., Anastas, J., & Metrey, G. (2002). Outcomes of social work education: The case for social work self-efficacy. Journal of Social Work Education , 38, 115-133.
26.
Howard, G.S., & Dailey, P.R. (1979). Response shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 144-150.
27.
Howard, G.S., Daily, P.R., & Gulanick, N.A. (1979). The feasibility of informed pretests in attenuating response-shift bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 481-494.
28.
Howard, G.S., Ralph, K.M., Gulanick, N.A., Maxwell, S.E., Nance, D.W., & Gerber, S.K. (1979). Internal invalidity in pretest—posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 1-23.
29.
Parducci, A. (2000). An historical introduction to response shift. In C. E. Schwartz & M. A. G. Sprangers (Eds.), Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality-of-life research (pp. 3-7). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
30.
Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-60). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Robinson, E.A.R., & Doueck, H.J. (1994). Implications of the pre/post/then design for evaluating social group work. Research on Social Work Practice, 4, 224-239.
32.
Rosenthal, R. (1990). Replication in behavioral research. In J. W. Neulip (Ed.), Handbook of Replication Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences (pp. 1-30). Corte Madera, CA: Select Press [a special issue of the Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5 (1990)].
33.
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (Eds.). (2000a). Adapting to changing health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
Schwartz, C.E., & Sprangers, M.A.G. (2000b). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. In C. E. Schwartz & M. A. G. Sprangers (Eds.), Adapting to changing health (pp. 81-107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Sprangers, M.A.G., & Schwartz, C.E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality-of-life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1507-1515.
37.
Van Voorhis, R.M., & Hostetter, C. (2006). The impact of MSW education on social worker empowerment and commitment to client empowerment through social justice advocacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 105-121.
