Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: To test the original factor structure of the Theoretical Evaluation Self Test (TEST) and to assess alternate factor structures. TEST includes the major psychotherapy theories (cognitive-behavioral, family, humanistic, and psychodynamic), ecosystemic and pragmatic approaches, and a cultural competency orientation. Method: Composing the replication sample are 146 MSW students and 32 practicing clinicians. Some analyses also include a previously collected sample (n = 130). Results: Five of the six original subscales are replicated by exploratory factor analysis and by assessing factor congruence. A four-factor solution is a better fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Conclusions: The six-factor solution, with its traditional theoretical divisions, is recommended for use as a self-scoring educational tool. However, the statistically stronger four-factor solution is preferable for research applications.

Keywords

theoretical orientation psychotherapy measurement factor analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken, L.A. (1996). Rating scales and checklists: Evaluating behavior, personality and attitudes. New York: John Wiley .

Arbuckle, J. , & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user's guide Chicago : Small Waters Corp .

Bohart, A.C. (2000). Paradigm clash: Empirically supported treatments versus empirically supported psychotherapy practice . Psychotherapy Research, 10, 488-493 .

Chambless, D.L. , & Ollendick, T.H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685-716 .

Coleman, D. (2002). Personal therapy: A catalyst to relational awareness . Irish Journal of Psychology, 23, 73-85 .

Coleman, D. (2003). Learning about therapy theories: An empirical test of an experiential technique . Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(3/4), 73-89 .

Coleman, D. (2004). The theoretical evaluation self test (TEST): A preliminary validation study . Social Work Research, 28, 117-128 .

Guadagnoli, E. , & Velicer, W.F. (1988). Relation to sample size to the stability of component patterns . Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275 .

Heppner, P.P. , Kivlighan, D.M. , Jr., & Wampold, B.E. (1999). Research design in counseling . Belmont CA: Wadsworth .

10.

Hu, L. , & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55 .

11.

Jensen, J.P. , Bergin, A.E. , & Greaves, D.W. (1990). The meaning of eclecticism: New survey and analysis of components . Professional Psychology: Research & Practice , 21, 124-130 .

12.

Larson, D. (1980). Therapeutic schools, styles and schoolism: A national survey . Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 20, 3-21 .

13.

McCrae, R.R. , Zonderman, A.B. , Costa, P.T. , Bond, M.H. , & Paunonen, S. (1996). Evaluating replication of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566 .

14.

Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill .

15.

National Association of Social Workers. (2002 ). Demographics PRN 1,2,2000. Retrieved August 23, 2006, from http://www.socialworkers.org/naswprn/surveyone/demogr.pdf

16.

Norcross, J. (1985). In defense of theoretical orientations for clinicians . The Clinical Psychologist, 38, 13-17 .

17.

Poznanski, J.J. , & McLennan, J. (1995). Conceptualizing and measuring counselors' theoretical orientation . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 411-422 .

18.

Russell, D.W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629-1646 .

19.

Tabachnick, B. , & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .

20.

van de Vijver, F. , & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

21.

Velicer, W.F. , & Fava, J.L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery . Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251 .

22.

West, S.G. , Finch, J.F. , & Curran, P.J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables . In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

23.

Worthington, R.L. , & Dillon, F.R. (2003). The Theoretical Orientation Profile Scale-Revised: A validation study . Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 36(2), 95-105 .

Further Factorial Validity of a Scale of Therapist Theoretical Orientation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References