Objectives: Characteristics of the child victim, perpetrator, and maltreatment incident were used to examine predictors of court involvement in cases of serious child maltreatment. Method: Cases were drawn from those reported to: child protective services (n = 225), sheriff's office ( n = 225), prosecutor's office ( n = 60), and dependency court ( n = 65). Logistic regression was used to calculate predicted probabilities of criminal court involvement and dependency court involvement Results: Cases involving female victims were more likely to be filed in criminal court, and sexual abuse had the highest likelihood of prosecution. Cases involving male perpetrators, older perpetrators, and multiple victims were more likely to be filed for prosecution. Physical neglect was the most common type of maltreatment to result in dependency court filings. Perpetrator gender had opposite effects in the two systems. Conclusion: Tracking cases even in the same jurisdiction is confounded by the lack of common identifiers across the agencies involved.
Administration on Children Youth and Families. (2003). Child maltreatment 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
2.
Bishop, S. J., Murphy, J. M., Hicks, R., Quinn, D., Lewis, P. J., Grace, M., et al. (2000). What progress has been made in meeting the needs of seriously maltreated children? The course of 200 cases through the Boston Juvenile Court. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 599-610.
3.
Bishop, S. J., Murphy, J. M., Jellinek, M. S., Quinn, D., & Poitrast, F. G. (1992). Protecting seriously maltreated children: Time delays in a court sample. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 465-474.
4.
Bradshaw, T. L., & Markes, A. E. (1990). Beyond a reasonable doubt: Factors that influence the legal disposition of child sexual abuses cases. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 276-285.
5.
Brewer, K. D., Rowe, D. M.,& Brewer, D. D. (1997). Factors related to prosecution of child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 91-111.
6.
Chapman, J. R.,& Smith, B. E. (1987) Child sexual abuse: An analysis of case processing. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
7.
Cheit, R. E., & Goldschmidt, E. (1997). Child molesters in the criminal justice system: A comprehensive case-flow analysis of the Rhode Island docket (1985-1993). New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 23, 267-301.
8.
Cross, T. P., Martell, D., McDonald, E., & Ahl, M. (1999). The criminal justice system and child placement in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 4, 32-44.
9.
Cross, T. P., Vos, E. D., & Whitcomb, D. (1994). Prosecution of child sexual abuse: Which cases are accepted?Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, 663-677.
10.
Cross, T. P., Whitcomb, D., & Vos, E. D. (1995). Criminal justice outcomes of prosecution of child sexual abuse: A case flow analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19 (2), 1431-1442.
11.
Cullen, B. J., Smith, P. H., Funk, J. B., & Haaf, R. A. (2000). A matched cohort comparison of a criminal justice system's response to child sexual abuse: A profile of perpetrators. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 569-577.
12.
Davidson, H. A. (1997). Courts and child maltreatment. In M. E. Helfer, R. S. Kempe, & R. D. Krugman (Eds.), The battered child (5th ed., pp. 482-499). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Davis, N. S., & Wells, S. J. (1996). Justice system processing of child abuse and neglect cases (Final report). Washington DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.
14.
Faller, K. C., & Henry, J. (2000). Child sexual abuse: A case study in community collaboration. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1215-1225.
15.
Glyn, C. (1988). Precious time: Working with the courts to get children safely home. Miami, FL: Dade County League of Women Voters.
16.
Gray, E. (1993). Unequal justice: The prosecution of child sexual abuse. New York: Free Press.
17.
Grippando, T. (1990). Children case adrift: The failure of the juvenile justice system. Chicago Bar Association Record, 17, 17-27.
18.
Knepper, P.,& Barton, S. M. (1996). Informal sources of delay in child maltreatment proceedings: Evidence from the Kentucky Court Improvement Project. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 47, 23-37.
19.
Martin, S. E., & Besharov, D. J. (1991). Police and child abuse: New policies for expanded responsibilities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
20.
McEwen, J. T. (1995). National assessment program: 1994 survey results. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
McEwen, J. T., & Nugent, E. (1990). National assessment program: Survey results for prosecutors. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
22.
Sedlak, A. J., & Broadhurst, D. D. (1996). Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.
23.
Stroud, D. D., Martens, S.,& Barker, J. (2000). Criminal investigation of child sexual abuse: A comparison of cases referred to the prosecutor to those not referred. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 689-700.
24.
Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (1992). Predictors of legal intervention in child maltreatment cases. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 807-821.
25.
Whitcomb, D. (1992). When the victim is a child: Second edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
26.
Whitcomb, D.,& Hardin, M. (1996). Coordinating criminal and juvenile court proceedings in child maltreatment cases. National Institute of Justice research preview (NCJ 161835 Grant No.92-IJCXK034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
27.
Whitcomb, D., Shapiro, E. R., &, Stellwagen, L. (1985). When the victim is a child: Issues for judges and prosecutors. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
