A Large Sample Evaluation of a Court-Mandated Batterer Intervention Program: Investigating Differential Program Effect for African American and Caucasian Men
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2006
A Large Sample Evaluation of a Court-Mandated Batterer Intervention Program: Investigating Differential Program Effect for African American and Caucasian Men
Objective: The purpose of the present study was to (a) evaluate a 26-week batterer intervention program by investigating changes in psychological variables related to abuse (i.e., truthfulness, violence, lethality, control, alcohol use, drug use, and stress coping abilities) between pretreatment and posttreatment assessments in a large sample of men involuntarily placed in treatment and (b) investigate the differential effectiveness of this same batterer intervention program for African American and Caucasian batterers. Method: The study employed a secondary analysis of 850 treatment completers. Results: The findings of this study suggest that the court-ordered batterers comprising this sample demonstrate significant changes in the desired direction on psychological variables related to domestic violence, as a result of participation in a court-mandated treatment program, with no significant difference in terms of magnitude of change on these same psychological variables between African American and Caucasian batterers. Conclusion: Implications of the findings for social workers were explored and discussed.
Almeida, R., Woods, R., Messineo, T., & Font, R. (1998). Cultural context model. In M. McGoldrick (Ed.), Re-visioning family therapy: Race, culture and gender in clinical practice (pp. 404-432). New York: Guilford.
2.
Armitage, P., & Berry, G. (1994). Statistical methods in medical research (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.
3.
Babcock, J., Green, C., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
4.
Buttell, F., & Carney, M. (2005). Do batterer intervention programs serve African-American and Caucasian batterers equally well? An investigation of a 26-week program. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 19-28.
5.
Buttell, F., & Pike, C. (2003). Investigating the differential effectiveness of a batterer treatment program on outcomes for African-American and Caucasian batterers. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 675-692.
6.
Davis, R., & Taylor, B. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women and Criminal Justice, 10, 69-93.
7.
Davis, R., Taylor, B., & Maxwell, C. (1998). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. National Institute of Justice Final Report No. 94-IJ-CX-0047). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
8.
Dunford, F. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468-476.
9.
Dutton, D. (1995). A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 203-221.
10.
Dutton, D., Landholt, M., Starzomski, A., & Bodnarchuk, M. (2001). Validation of the Propensity for Abusiveness Scale in diverse male populations. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 59-75.
11.
Eisikovits, Z., & Edleson, J. (1989). Intervening with men who batter: A critical review of the literature. Social Service Review, 37, 385-414.
12.
Feder, L., & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19, 343-375.
13.
Follingstad, D. R., Bradley, R. G., Laughlin, J. E., & Burke, L. (1999). Risk factors and correlates of dating violence: The relevance of examining frequency and severity levels in a college sample. Violence and Victims, 14, 365-380.
14.
Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L., McNeill-Harkins, K., & Polek, D. (1988). Factors related to physical violence in dating relationships. Victimology International Journal, 3, 169-182.
15.
Geffner, R., & Rosenbaum, A. (2002). Domestic violence offenders: Treatment and intervention standards. Special issue: Domestic violence offenders: Current interventions, research, and implications for policies and standards. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5, 1-9.
16.
Gelles, R. (2002). Standards for programs for men who batter? Not yet. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5, 11-20.
17.
Gondolf, E. (1997). Batterer programs: What we know and need to know. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 83-98.
18.
Gondolf, E. (2001). Limitations of experimental evaluations of batterers programs. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 2, 79-88.
19.
Gondolf, E., & Williams, O. (2001). Culturally focused batterer counseling for African-American men. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 2, 283-295.
20.
Hinkle, D., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. (1994). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2001). Standards for batterer treatment programs: How can research inform our decisions?Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5, 165-180.
22.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Bates, L., Smultzer, N., & Sandin, E. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 65-99.
23.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe & Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000-1019.
24.
Human Rights Watch. (2003, April). Incarcerated America. Retrieved October 29, 2004, from http://hrw.org/backgrounder/usa/incarceration/
25.
Kroner, D. G., & Weeks, J. R. (1996). Balanced inventory of desirable responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity with an offender sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 323-333.
26.
Levesque, D.(1999). Violence desistance among battering men: Existing interventions and the application of the Transtheoretical Model of Change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston.d.
27.
Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. (1983). Early predictors of delinquency: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68-99.
28.
Maiuro, R., Hagar, T., Lin, H., & Olson, N. (2001). Are current state standards for domestic violence perpetrator treatment adequately informed by research? A question of questions. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5, 21-44.
29.
Morrison, S., & Nesius, A. (2003, September). Findings from an evidenced-based review of batterer prevention and intervention programs. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Family Violence, San Diego, CA.
30.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
O’Leary, K. D., & Curley, A. D. (1986). Assertion and family violence: Correlates of spouse abuse. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 281-289.
32.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two component models of social desirability responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
33.
Rosenbaum, A., & Leisring, P. (2002). A group intervention program for batterers. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5, 57-71.
34.
Rosenbaum, A., & O’Leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 63-71.
35.
Rosenfeld, B. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 205-226.
36.
Tolman, R., & Bennett, L. (1990). A review of quantitative research on men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 87-118.
