Objectives: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (C-IRI) for the assessment of empathy in Chinese people were examined. Method: The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) was translated to Chinese, and an expert panel reviewed its content validity and cultural relevance. The translated instrument (C-IRI) was administered to 189 junior high school students and 391 university students. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a stable hierarchical three-factor structure that was consistent with structure of the English IRI, but the cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy were combined to form a new factor. The subscales of the C-IRI demonstrated acceptable to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Some evidence for the construct validity of the measure was also found. Conclusions: The C-IRI possessed acceptable psychometric properties in Chinese adolescent samples. The present findings suggest that the cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy are not differentiated in Chinese adolescents.
Bennett, C. J., Legon, J., & Zilberfein, F. (1989). The significance of empathy in current hospital based practice. Social Work in Health Care, 14, 27-41.
2.
Berger, K. S., & Thompson, R. A. (2000). The developing person through childhood and adolescence. New York: Worth.
3.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Chau, I. Y. F., & Landreth, G. L. (1997). Filial therapy with Chinese parents: Effects on parental empathic interactions, parental acceptance of child and parental stress. International Journal of Play Therapy, 6, 75-92.
6.
Cheung, C. K., Lee, J. J., & Chan, C. M. (1994). Explicating filial piety in relation to family cohesion. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 565-580.
7.
Cliffordson, C. (2002). The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 49-59.
8.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multi-dimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
9.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 44, 113-126.
10.
Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
11.
Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 70-87.
12.
Duan, C., & Hill, C. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 261-274.
13.
Dyche, L., & Zayas, L. H. (2001). Cross-cultural empathy and training the contemporary psychotherapist. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29, 245-258.
14.
Egan, G. (1998). The skilled helper. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
15.
Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 27, 849-857.
16.
Eisenberg, N., Shea, C. L., Carlo, G.,& Knight, G. P. (1991). Empathy-related responding and cognition: A “chicken and the egg” dilemma. In W. M. Gewirtz & J. L. Kurtines (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development - Volume 2: Research (pp. 63-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Epp, L. R. (2000). Self-understanding: The path to empathy. In P. R. Breggin, G. Breggin, & F. Bemak (Eds.), Dimensions of empathic therapy (pp. 154-161). New York: Springer.
18.
Erera, P. I. (1997). Empathy training for helping professionals: Model and evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 245-260.
19.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 712-722.
21.
Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognitions, and empathy (pp. 103-131). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Kohut, H. (1978). The search for the self: Selected writing of Heinz Kohut: 1950-1978. New York: International Universities Press.
23.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
Nerdrum, P., & Lundquist, K. (1995). Does participation in communication skills training increase student levels of communicated empathy? A controlled outcome study. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 11, 139-157.
26.
Raines, J. C. (1990). Empathy in clinical social work. Clinical Social Work Journal, 18, 57-72.
27.
Romer, D., Gruder, C. L., & Lizzadro, T. (1986). A person-situation approach to altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1001-1012.
28.
Shek, D. T. L. (1988). Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 10, 303-317.
29.
Shek, D. T. L. (1991). The factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: A confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 985-997.
30.
Shek, D. T. L. (1998). The Chinese version of the Self-Report Family Inventory: Does culture make a difference?Research on Social Work Practice, 8, 315-329.
31.
Shek, D. T. L. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Self-Report Family Inventory: Findings based on a longitudinal study. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 485-502.
32.
Shek, D. T. L. (Ed.). (2002). Special issue on “Research on social work practice in Chinese communities”. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 485-581.
33.
Springer, D. W., Abell, N.,& Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 408-439.
34.
Strayer, J. (1987). Affective and cognitive perspectives on empathy. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Empathy and its development (pp. 218-244). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (PRS Report no. 984). Educational Testing Service.
36.
Vinton, L., & Harrington, P. (1994). An evaluation of the use of videotape in teaching empathy. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 9, 71-84.
37.
Wong, D. F. K., Yan, P., Lo, E., & Hung, M. (2003). Mental health and social competence of Mainland Chinese immigrant and local youth in Hong Kong: A comparison. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 12, 85-110.
38.
Wong, K. K. (1998). A re-construction of studies on morality in Taiwan. Indigenous Psychological Research, 9, 121-175. (in Chinese)
39.
Yang, K. S. (1981). The formation and change of Chinese personality: A cultural-ecological perspective. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 39-56.
40.
Yeung, K. C., Chan, K. L., Cheung, M. S., Au, K. L., & Yuen, Y. T. (1999). Training manual for enhancing parent-child communication: The parallel group approach. Hong Kong, People’s Republic ofChina: Hong Kong University Press.
41.
Yuen, T., Landreth, G., & Baggerly, J. (2002). Filial therapy with immigrant Chinese families. International Journal of Play Therapy, 11, 63-90.
