Objective/Method: The Sexual Abuse of Males Perceptions Scale (SAMPS) is a measure designed to assess an individual’s personal and projected social perceptions of myths about the sexual abuse of boys and men. Myths are rigid, stereotypical beliefs that invalidate the experiences and minimize the profound effects of sexual abuse on boys and men. This study establishes the initial psychometric properties for the SAMPS, based on a sample of 333 students enrolled in diverse courses (i.e., business, psychology, social work, urban and regional planning, and education) at a large, southern university. Results/Conclusions: The SAMPS was developed as a three-factor instrument. Preliminary findings confirm this structure and indicate the SAMPS shows promise for future uses relating to training, research, and clinical practice.
Briere, J. (1997). Professional manual for the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
2.
Briere, J.,& Runtz, M. (1989). The Trauma Symptom Checklist (TSC-33): Early data on a new scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 151-163.
3.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
4.
Chandy, J. M., Blum, R. W., & Resnick, M. D. (1996). Gender-specific outcomes for sexually abused adolescents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 1219-1231.
5.
Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (1998). Interventions for sexually abused children: Initial treatment outcome findings. Child Maltreatment: Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, 3, 17-26.
6.
Collings, S. J. (1997). Development, reliability and validity of the Child Sexual Abuse Myth Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 665-674.
7.
Coutois, C. A. (1988). Healing the incest wound: Adult survivors in therapy. New York: Norton.
8.
Davies, M., & McCartney, S. (2003). Effects of gender and sexuality on judgments of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 391-398.
9.
Dersch, C. A., & Munsch, J. (1999). Male victims of sexual abuse: An analysis of substantiation of child protective services reports. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 8, 27-48.
10.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Douglas, A., Coghill, D., & Will, D. (1996). A survey of the first five years’ work of a child sexual abuse team. Child Abuse Review, 5, 227-238.
12.
Fabelo-Alcover, H. E., & Sowers, K. M. (2003). Cognitions and Behaviors Scale: Development and initial performance of a scale for use with adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 43-64.
13.
Finkelhor, D., & Berliner, L. (1995). Research on the treatment of sexually abused children: A review and recommendations. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1408-1423.
14.
Finkelhor, D., & Browne, A. (1985). The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: A conceptualization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, 530-541.
15.
Garnefski, N., & Arends, E. (1998). Sexual abuse and adolescent maladjustment: Differences between male and female victims. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 99-107.
16.
Gartner, R. B. (1999). Betrayed as boys: Psychodynamic treatment of sexually abused men. New York: Guilford.
17.
Holmes, G. R., Offen, L., & Waller, G. (1997). See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Why do relatively few male victims of childhood sexual abuse receive help for abuse-related issues in adulthood?Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 69-88.
18.
Holmes, W. C., & Slap, G. B. (1998). Sexual abuse of boys: Definition, prevalence, correlates, sequel, and management. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1855-1862.
19.
Hunter, M. (1990). The sexually abused male: Prevalence, impact, and treatment (Vol. 1). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
20.
SPSS. (2000). SPSS for Windows (Version 10.07). Chicago: Author.
21.
Kendall Tackett, K. A., & Watson, M. W. (1991). Factors that influence professionals’ perceptions of behavioral indicators of child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 385-395.
22.
Kerr Melanson, P. S. (1999). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories (homosexuality). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 59(10-B), 5620.
23.
King, N. J., Tonge, B. J., Mullen, P., Myerson, N., Heyne, D., Rollings, S., et al. (2000). Treating sexually abused children with posttraumatic stress symptoms: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 1347-1355.
24.
Lambie, I., Seymour, F., Lee, A., & Adams, P. (2002). Resiliency in the victim-offender cycle of male sexual abuse. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 31-48.
25.
Lisak, D. (1995). Integrating a critique of gender in the treatment of male survivors of childhood abuse. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 32, 258-269.
26.
Little, L., & Hamby, S. L. (1999). Gender differences in sexual abuse outcomes and recovery experiences: A survey of therapist-survivors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 378-385.
27.
Mannarino, A. P., Cohen, J. A., & Berman, S. R. (1994). The Children’s Attributions and Perceptions Scale: A new measure of sexual abuse-related factors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 204-211.
28.
Nalavany, B. A. (2002). The sexual abuse of young males: Neglected in outcome studies? Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University Tallahassee.
29.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Paulson, M., & Kurkjian, S. (2002, April 16). Pope orders U.S. cardinals to Vatican. Tampa Tribune, pp. 1, 4.
31.
Randall, W., Parrila, R., & Sobsey, D. (2000). Gender, disability status and risk for sexual abuse in children. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7, 1-15.
32.
Richey-Suttles, S., & Remer, R. (1997). Psychologists’ attitudes toward adult male survivors of sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 43-61.
33.
Ross, L. D. (2001). Getting down to fundamentals: Lay dispositionism and the attributions of psychologists. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 37-40.
34.
Rothman, J., Damron-Rodriquez, J., & Shenassa, E. (1994). Systematic research synthesis: Conceptual integration methods of metaanalysis. In J. Rothman & E. J. Thomas (Eds.), Intervention research: Design and development for human service (pp. 133-160). New York: Haworth.
35.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, J. N., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Spencer, T. D., & Tan, J. C. H. (1999). Undergraduate students’ reactions to analogue male disclosure of sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 8, 73-90.
37.
Spiegel, J. (2003). SAM: Sexual abuse of males: A model of theory and practice. New York: Brunner-Rutledge.
38.
Springer, D., Abell, N., & Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 408-439.
39.
Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Nugent, W. R. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 2. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 805-832.
40.
Struve, J. (1990). Dancing with the patriarchy: The politics of sexual abuse. In M. Hunter (Ed.), The sexually abused male: Prevalance, impact and treatment (Vol. 1, pp. 3-45). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
41.
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.
