Objective: A synthesis was conducted to assess outcome findings and methodological characteristics of controlled evaluations of adolescent substance abuse treatments. Method: Extensive computerized and manual bibliographic searches were employed to identify controlled evaluations of adolescent substance abuse treatment. Meta-analytic techniques were utilized to gauge effect sizes across studies to determine which interventions are most effective. An index of methodological quality was computed for each study using ratings of 13 study design factors. Interventions were classified by a combination of their design strength, achievement of desired effect, and other evidence factors. Results: Findings indicate that multidimensional family therapy and cognitive-behavioral group treatment received the highest level of evidentiary support. Seven other interventions showed evidence of effectiveness as well. Conclusions: Several interventions are effective for treating adolescent substance abuse. These treatments are psycho-social in nature, exist within a structured framework, and should be appealing to social work practitioners.
Apodaca, T. R., & Miller, W. R. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bibliotherapy for alcohol problems. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 289-304.
2.
*Azrin, N. H., Donohue, B., Besalel, V. A., Kogan, E. S.,& Acierno, R. (1994). Youth drug abuse treatment: A controlled outcome study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3, 1-17.
3.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wach (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span (pp. 3-28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Deas, D., & Thomas, S. E. (2001). An overview of controlled studies of adolescent substance abuse treatment. American Journal on Addictions, 10, 178-189.
6.
Drug Abuse Warning Network. (2001). Emergency department drug mentions for selected drug groups, total drug mentions, and total drug episodes: 1978 to 2001. 2001 DAWN ED Report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
7.
*Friedman, A. S. (1989). Family therapy vs. parent groups: Effects on adolescent drug abusers. American Journal of Family Therapy, 17, 335-347.
8.
*Friedman, A. S., Terras, A., & Glassman, K. (2002). Multimodel substance use intervention program for male delinquents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 11, 43-65.
9.
*Henggeler, S. W., Borduin, C. M., Melton, G. B., Mann, B. J., Smith, L. A., Hall, J. A., et al. (1991). Effects of multisystemic therapy on drug use and abuse in serious juvenile offenders: A progress report from two outcome studies. Family Dynamics Addiction Quarterly, 1, 40-51.
10.
*Henggeler, S. W., Clingempeel, G. W., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2002). Four-year follow-up of multisystemic therapy with substance-abusing and substance-dependent juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 868-874.
11.
*Henggeler, S. W., Pickrel, S. G., & Brondino, M. J. (1999). Multisystemic treatment of substance-abusing and dependent delinquents: Outcomes, treatment fidelity, and transportability. Mental Health Services Research, 1, 171-184.
12.
*Joanning, H., Quinn, W., Thomas, F., & Mullen, R. (1992). Treating adolescent drug abuse: A comparison of family systems therapy, group therapy, and family drug education. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 345-356.
13.
Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2002). Monitoring the future. National results on adolescent drug use; Overview of key findings, 2001. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
14.
*Kaminer, Y., & Burleson, J. A. (1999). Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers: 15-month follow-up of a pilot study. American Journal on Addictions, 8, 114-119.
15.
*Kaminer, Y., Burleson, J. A., Blitz, C., Sussman, J., & Rounsaville, B. J. (1998). Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers: A pilot study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186, 684-690.
16.
*Kaminer, Y., Burleson, J. A., & Goldberger, R. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral coping skills and psychoeducation therapies for adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 737-745.
17.
*Lewis, R. A., Piercy, F. P., Sprenkle, D. H., & Trepper, T. S. (1990). Family-based interventions for helping drug-abusing adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 82-95.
18.
*Liddle, H. A., Dakof, G. A., Parker, K., Diamond, S.Barrett, K., & Tejeda, M. (2001). Multidimensional family therapy for adolescent drug abuse: Results of a randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 651-688.
19.
*McGillicuddy, N. B., Rychtarik, R. G., Duquette, J. A., & Morsheimer, E. T. (2001). Development of a skill training program for parents of substance-abusing adolescents. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20, 59-68.
20.
Miller, W. R., Andrews, N. R., Wilbourne, P., & Bennett, M. E. (1998). A wealth of alternatives: Effective treatments for alcohol problems. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change (2nd ed., pp. 203-216). New York: Plenum.
21.
Miller, W. R., Brown, J. M., Simpson, T. L., Handmaker, N. S., Bien, T. H., Luckie, L. H., et al. (1995). What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In R. K. Hester & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives (2nd ed., pp. 12-44). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
Miller, W. R., & Wilbourne, P. L. (2002). Mesa grande: A methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatment for alcohol use disorders. Addiction, 97, 265-277.
23.
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. (2002). Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume I. Summary of national findings. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
24.
Newcomb, M. D. (1995). Identifying high risk youth: Prevalence and patterns of adolescent drug abuse. In E. Rahdert & D. Czerkowicz (Eds.), Adolescent drug abuse: Clinical assessment and therapeutic interventions (NIDA Research Monograph 156). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
25.
Perkonigg, A., Lieb, R., Hofler, M., Schuster, P., Sonntag, H., & Wittchen, H. U. (1999). Patterns of cannabis use, abuse and dependence over time: Incidence, progression and stability in a sample of 1,228 adolescents. Addiction, 94, 1663-1678.
26.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
*Santisteban, D. A., Coatsworth, J. D., Perez-Vidal, A., Kurtines, W. M., Schwartz, S. J., LaPierriere, A., et al. (2003). Efficacy of brief strategic family therapy in modifying Hispanic adolescent behavior problems and substance use. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 121-133.
29.
*Sealock, M. D., Gottfredson, D. C., & Gallagher, C. A. (1997). Drug treatment for juvenile offenders: Some good and bad news. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 210-236.
30.
Vaughn, M. G., & Howard, M. O. (2004). Integrated psychosocial and opioid antagonist treatment for alcohol dependence: A systematic review of controlled evaluations. Social Work Research, 28, 41-53.
31.
Volpicelli, J. R., Pettinati, H. M., McLellan, A. T., & O’Brien, C. P. (2001). Combining medication and psychosocial treatments for addictions: The BRENDA approach. New York: Guilford.
32.
Waldron, H. B. (1997). Adolescent substance abuse and family therapy outcome. Advances in Clinical Child Psychiatry, 19, 199-234.
33.
*Waldron, H. B., Slesnick, N., Brody, J. L., Turner, C. W., & Peterson, T. R. (2001). Treatment outcomes for adolescent substance abuse at 4- and 7- month assessments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 802-813.
34.
Weinberg, N. Z., Rahdert, E., Colliver, J. D., & Glantz, M. D. (1998). Adolescent substance abuse: A review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37(3), 252-261.
35.
Williams, R. J., & Chang, S. Y. (2000). A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 138-166.
36.
Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., Orland, E., Weller, C., & Latimer, W. W. (2000). The effectiveness of the Minnesota model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction, 95, 601-612.
37.
Young, S. E., Corley, R. P., Stallings, M. C., Rhee, S. H., Crowley, T. J., & Hewitt, J. K. (2002). Substance use, abuse and dependence in adolescence: Prevalence, symptom profiles, and correlates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 309-322.
